• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Cont: Musk buys Twitter II

There's a Mexican place in my town called La Taqueria that serves pretty authentic Mexican food. They even have an all-you-can-eat buffet where you can order as much food as you want. If I wasn't short on money I'd celebrate there. Maybe when TACO finally croaks.
 
Yeah, even if people outside of stoner circles get that the numbers "420" refer to recreational marijuana usage, it's pretty likely that they don't know "why" or it's origins. You're not out of the norm by any means.


I'm so ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ sick of "May the 4th be with you" and "Revenge of the 5th", I'm about to lose my ◊◊◊◊. The 5th of May is Cinco de ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ Mayo and everything else can eat an enormous sack of dicks. Now, have I ever watched Star Wars? No. Do I want to? No, but I would put this on the same level as 420 in that I know it's popular based on a movie, but I don't know the story of those ◊◊◊◊ ass movies.


I feel like to be "in the know" you would have to know more than numbers = weed. Perhaps I'm the odd one out, but I bet you could go up to 50 people outside of a bank and ask, "Do you recognize 420?"

They'd say, "Yes."

"Do you know how it originated and the relevance?" and I would bet a large amount of money the answer would be "no".

It's a pune or, a play on words.
 

elizabeth warren raises concerns against x money

Warren is giving Musk until April 21st to answer more than a dozen questions about X Money, including whether Cross River Bank will act as its partner, whether it plans to issue a stablecoin, and what controls the service will have to prevent scams, fraud, and illicit finance. Warren is also pressing Musk on whether X Money will “surveil and monetize consumer transaction data.”
 
Last edited:
That story is more than a year old. Did social security survive? (That's not a rhetorical question.)
Social Security is still around. The current financial state seems to be worsening, yes, but that's a slightly different matter.

With that said, Musk's attacks on SS were nothing truly new. The longstanding Republican Two Santas strategy has long been a mainstay of Republican politics, after all, and one of the main goals of that is the elimination of Social Security and similar programs. What Musk did was entirely in line with that strategy.
 
Last edited:
Arthwollipot said:
Elon Musk’s X fined $650,000 after failing to comply with Australian child safety notice [The Guardian]
Elon Musk’s social media network X has been fined A$650,000 (US$463,063) after admitting it failed to provide information about how it was tackling online child abuse material.
  1. Musk will root around in his chesterfield cushions for change to pay the fine with.
  2. Please not not bare URLs into the forum. There's no guarantee they can be read by everyone in the world, now or in the future.
  3. Ask yourself, “If I didn't include the URL, would my post make sense?” (In this case, decidedly no!) If you wish, I can catalogue all the reasons for you—it's a 700 word essay.
  4. In this message I demonstrate a future-proof way to do it.
 
Last edited:
  1. Please not not bare URLs into the forum. There's no guarantee they can be read by everyone in the world, now or in the future.
  2. Ask yourself, “If I didn't include the URL, would my post make sense?” (In this case, decidedly no!) If you wish, I can catalogue all the reasons for you—it's a 700 word essay.
  3. In this message I demonstrate a future-proof way to do it.
Anybody who is using the forum the way it is designed can see a full preview with the website clearly identified. Xenforo has functions to counter exactly the kinds of issues you bring up. And you know for a fact that I'm on board with your Clean Link campaign. The forum cleans links automatically.
 
I disagree. Embedded urls can't be checked on phones and mobile devices. Not everyone uses a mouse.

Anybody who is using the forum the way it is designed can see a full preview with the website clearly identified. Xenforo has functions to counter exactly the kinds of issues you bring up. And you know for a fact that I'm on board with your Clean Link campaign. The forum cleans links automatically.
That’s not what is meant by a bare URL. The poster was talking about posting a URL without any accompanying text. On that point, I agree with him.
 
That’s not what is meant by a bare URL. The poster was talking about posting a URL without any accompanying text. On that point, I agree with him.
There is accompanying text in the preview. If you're not seeing the preview, then you're not using the forum properly.
 
Anybody who is using the forum the way it is designed can see a full preview with the website clearly identified. Xenforo has functions to counter exactly the kinds of issues you bring up/
That's good when the preview actually works; it doesn't on all sites. The CBC and the New York Times are notable exceptions.

The forum software remembers the preview text (but not necessarily the image.) That's good, because if the link disappears from the web the preview text is still visible. But anyone clicking through to won't see the full text. Ergo, if what you really wanted to say was within the link itself, that could be lost. Hence why I recommend reposting the relevant bits yourself.

And you know for a fact that I'm on board with your Clean Link campaign.
Thanks!

The forum cleans links automatically.
Not all the time. Some sites actively push back on the attempt to generate a preview.

My initial post was based on the idea of digital preservation: so long as this forum works and is accessible, so should the user generated content. There is no guarantee the preview text and the linked content will remain available.

My points need to be re-worked in light of the facts previews often are sufficient and are preserved even if the URL disappears.
 
Last edited:
That's good when the preview actually works; it doesn't on all sites. The CBC and the New York Times are notable exceptions.
In those cases I add more context. I've been doing this for a while, you know. I can use the Preview button. I know when the site is going to preview and when it isn't. In this case, it was The Guardian, which I know previews correctly, because I've posted links to it many times before.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom