Mueller Investigation pt5

Status
Not open for further replies.
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Not according to Mueller........
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure you're bright enough to understand the difference between not pursuing charges and declaring someone innocent.

Prosecutors don't generally don't deal in the latter.
 
Minoosh said:
At attempt at collusion so inept that no reasonable prosecutor would pursue charges.
Click to expand...

Let's just note that "collusion" doesn't really mean anything. But meeting with foreign officials for the purpose of breaking the law sure looks like conspiracy, and that's a crime in itself.
 
Last edited:
Craig4 said:
Even if the report says what the Trump whore Bar says it does, there will still be plenty of out of context quotes to mine that could damage Trump in a well organized social media smear campaign. Democrats need a Swiftboat Veterans for truth type organization to use the report to slander the president.
Click to expand...
Not sure this is such a great idea. I'm more in favor of letting facts about the summary/report percolate a while. Partly because an immediate smear campaign could backfire or at the very best just be a matter of preaching to the choir. A top-down approach to smearing Trump might not be as effective as allowing the general public a chance to arrive at their own conclusions. I do have some confidence that commoners have decent BS detectors.
 
Toontown said:
The country will become even more divided anyway. Another big election is coming, and Russia is gearing up again. Objective: divide and conquer. This time, I expect them to try to make it look like the election was stolen, in hopes of touching off a civil war. It could work. The frogs are almost boiled.
Click to expand...

Giz said:
Unbelievable. Talk about hysteria, misinformation and divisiveness.
Click to expand...

Says the supporter of the most hysterical, lying, and divisive president in U.S. history.

When I overstate, I'm just speaking Trump's language. I know you understand Trumpspeak. I'm not fooled by your feigned outrage. You love that hysterical disinformative divisiveness.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
He was charged with Russian collusion daily on every Liberal news channel and by multiple Democrats. Many of those Democrats even claimed there was evidence of Russian collusion. Where were you? You never saw any of that?

Chris B.
Click to expand...


Oh. You wrote "charges" when you meant to write "accusations by random people".

Trump has never been charged with anything relating to the Mueller investigation.

Maybe you just lost track of the topic of this thread, or meant to be posting in a different one.

That's cool. Could happen to anyone.
 
Minoosh said:
Not sure this is such a great idea. I'm more in favor of letting facts about the summary/report percolate a while. Partly because an immediate smear campaign could backfire or at the very best just be a matter of preaching to the choir. A top-down approach to smearing Trump might not be as effective as allowing the general public a chance to arrive at their own conclusions. I do have some confidence that commoners have decent BS detectors.
Click to expand...

Screw that. Uranium One justifies anything. After that, no rule of honesty, decency or fairness need be observed. The Dems have the means to do the same thing to Trump now. They should do it.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Already asked and answered in thread.
Click to expand...

That's Barr's summary. As stated before, this does not "clear" Trump as he was not accused of any crime by the government. It's Barr's interpretation.

This has been explained to you in thread.

So, to summarize, you can't support your claim, and don't know what you're talking about.
 
Cain said:
The intolerant Left and their derangement syndrome. Robert Mueller, the Democrats' spiritual leader, said there was reasonable doubt, but they'd probably want Trump removed if there were only a 40% chance the president was a Russian asset. Hell, the Gestapo Deep State would want him booted it were a measly 30%.
Click to expand...

Well, after all if we believe there's even a one percent chance that he is our enemy we have to take it as an absolute certainty!
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Popehat article on Barr's letter
Click to expand...


As usual, a "right on the money" analysis by The Big Dog's best mate... Ken White.


"When prosecutors say that an investigation “did not establish” something, that doesn’t mean that they concluded it didn’t happen, or even that they don’t believe it happened. It means that the investigation didn’t produce enough information to prove that it happened. Without seeing Mueller’s full report, we don’t know whether this is a firm conclusion about lack of coordination or a frank admission of insufficient evidence. The difference is meaningful, both as a matter of history and because it might determine how much further Democrats in Congress are willing to push committee investigations of the matter."​
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom