Status
Not open for further replies.
...
My personal view is that Stone is one of the real top villains of the last few decades of American politics and he should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Do you think Mueller is holding some Stone charges involving Guccifer and Wikileaks back?

As for an unreliable witness, sure, but if an unreliable witness knows where the bodies are buried that's different.


As for Giuliani: Occam's Razor: He's a news distraction, and that's what Trump wants. He certainly can't be giving legal advice.
 
Do you think Mueller is holding some Stone charges involving Guccifer and Wikileaks back?

As for an unreliable witness, sure, but if an unreliable witness knows where the bodies are buried that's different.

Almost certainly. We're only seeing the charges he's "done" with. Everything that involves bigger fish waits until he leans on Stone for everything he can get before moving on.
 
My favorite line from the 2008 Toobin article:

“Roger is a stone-cold loser,” Trump told me. “He always tries taking credit for things he never did.”

Projecting much there, Donnie?
 
My personal view is that Stone is one of the real top villains of the last few decades of American politics and he should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Karl Rove is certainly a villain of the story, but I doubt there's anything illegal that could be pinned on him. Rove and Stone are from the same ratshagging stable, but horses of very different calibres.
 
From a better man than Nunes I'd call that chutzpah, but in Nunes's case it's just idiocy.
 

I particularly liked this tweeted reply:

https://twitter.com/DigsTheTruth/status/1089355859874873344

writes&shines


@DigsTheTruth
Follow Follow @DigsTheTruth
More
Replying to @tedlieu
A vich hunt.
- check out the embedded photo
 
He was publicising the leaks, and it was the publicity they had which caused Horowitz to decide that they needed to make a public announcement about the investigation. There are also indications he was the driving force behind the leaks

Mmm. Giuliani changed his story, by the way.


...The House investigation led by Nunes that pointedly refused to actually investigate potential collusion, anyways?

Something wrong with this list.

At least Gowdy, Rooney, and Ros-Lehtinen are no longer in the House.

ETA: neither are LoBiondo, and Westmoreland.

That... would remove 5, then. More utter incompetence on the Republican side?
 
...The House investigation led by Nunes that pointedly refused to actually investigate potential collusion, anyways?

I mean, if Nunes thought he was doing a good job, Mueller's embarrassed him by highlighting his spectacular failure. That's the most charitable explanation you can give the hack at this point and it doesn't really carry water given his previous actions.
 
1. I'm talking about the character of Roger Stone. Just indicted by Mueller. Hardly a diversion. Just more information.

2. I never said I wish that Stone got raped in prison. Only that he gets an ugly cell mate named Bubba who would make him his bitch. Given Stone's freaky history, I'm sure any activity between them would be consensual. Stone certainly has the appearance of a sub. And after all, it would hardly be different than his relationship with Donnie.

:eye-poppi

Wow
 
Last edited:
Which makes me wonder -- does attorney/client privilege still hold if the attorney volunteers all that information?

Not under oath, changes his story constantly: I think that negates any value.

And you could probably find Trump Tweets admitting to all the same things about the Tower meeting and the Cohen payouts anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom