Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm going to exit this echo chamber. May your hopes and dreams about the Mueller time come true. Alhough, I sincerely think many will be surprised with how this all ends.

Echo chamber? Because we analyze your theory critically? Echo chambers don't act that way. And if you think I'm just one-minded with these other clowns, you haven't been paying attention.

Nice hissy fit though.
 
Haven't we heard rumors that Manafort was negotiating a plea deal before? Its not out of the realm of possibility that he is, just that it seems like we've been been down this road before.

There was a delay at the end of the previous trial (I'm tempted to say between the end of the trial and sentencing, but I wouldn't like to sign my name to that off the top of my head) which some speculated might have been due to an attempt at a plea bargain. There was also this report a couple of weeks ago of plea bargain talks which did not go well for Manafort.

If this latest report is accurate, then that would suggest that Manafort thinks he has something more valuable to Mueller than he was previously prepared to offer.
 
I would find it surprising if propaganda seen by tens of millions of voters didn't have an impact. What do you think?



8.2%.


Approximately 130 million people voted in 2016

4.4 million saw those ads before the election, or 3.4 %.

So you're saying that 8.2% of voters changed their opinions due to 3.4% seeing the ads? OK...

But my theories are off.
 
Echo chamber? Because we analyze your theory critically? Echo chambers don't act that way. And if you think I'm just one-minded with these other clowns, you haven't been paying attention.

Nice hissy fit though.

Yes, wishing people good luck in their hopes and dreams is a hissy fit. Peace out.
 
Approximately 130 million people voted in 2016

4.4 million saw those ads before the election, or 3.4 %.

So you're saying that 8.2% of voters changed their opinions due to 3.4% seeing the ads? OK...

But my theories are off.
The ads were just one aspect of the Russian meddling. The hacked email drip-drip-drip was far more significant.
 
Approximately 130 million people voted in 2016

4.4 million saw those ads before the election, or 3.4 %.

So you're saying that 8.2% of voters changed their opinions due to 3.4% seeing the ads? OK...

But my theories are off.

First of all, that was a joke. Maybe I should've added a few decimal paces just to drive the point home.

Second, it isn't 4.4 million. It's 126 million people. How many of those are in the US, I don't know.
 
Trump Tweets

"“The President has absolutely demonstrated no wrongdoing whatsoever & that the Special Counsel has no evidence of any wrongdoing. In other words, it’s time to end this Witch Hunt.” @LouDobbs Russian “collusion” was just an excuse by the Democrats for having lost the Election!"

"“I can say, as it relates to the Senate Intelligence Committee Investigation, that we have NO hard evidence of Collusion.” Richard Burr (R-NC) Senate Intelligence Committee, Chairman"
 
Again, your behavior here is not at all different from the posters who discover 9/11 truth and wander into that subforum with long debunked theories, along with similar insults and bluster.


And those who enter the JFK forums, thinking they have just discovered new "evidence" and "theories" only to find that its old hat, long and repeatedly debunked bollocks.
 
4.4 million saw those ads before the election, or 3.4 %.

And the election was decided by a difference of around 70,000 votes in 3 key states, so yeah, I'd like to know what makes you so confident the ads didn't have an effect.

But, yeah, feel free to ignore that question, too. I've noticed you tend to avoid the hard ones. LOL
 
This presidency is such a cool series. I just have to watch each episode.

Every night is another cliff hanger. It's like Breaking Bad, you are always wondering "how are they ever going to make their way our of this barrel of molasses?" Yet they always manage to only to get themselves in yet another bind. I just can't wait for the season finale, It's going to be epic!
 
I saw this series before, when it was called "Watergate".
It's like a lot of series that get rebooted, yeah production values are high, obviously more money spent but they overhype everything, so we end up with a character like Trump who is totally unbelievable, no one like him would ever have been elected POTUS, so it breaks the suspension of belief. I'm expecting the big twist ending will be Clinton waking up in bed in the Whitehouse and turning to her husband saying "I've just had the most terrible nightmare!"

And there is no way it will get renewed for a second season*

*Mind you I've been wrong before now, never thought Friends would get a second season.
 
Trump's closest adviser says he will fire Mueller after the hurricane.

Fox News and talk radio show host Sean Hannity is a known ally and supporter of President Donald Trump, often using his various media platforms to offer praise or even policy advice for the president.

When talking to a listener who called into his radio show Tuesday afternoon, Hannity said he expects the president to fire special counsel Robert Mueller and end the investigation into Russian election interference “sooner rather than later,” potentially after Hurricane Florence passes. Given Hannity and Trump reportedly talk so regularly that some White House staffers, according to The Washington Post, have dubbed the conservative media personality the president's unofficial chief of staff, it remains to be seen whether Hannity is offering the president his personal advice or if he’s simply expressing wishful thinking.

Linky.
 

Bull- ****. Mueller had a hung jury because one member was a former jilted spouse. He can weed those out during voir dire and then gouge out one of Manfort's eye's and **** start the brain hole. Mueller isn't looking for a deal. He's looking to skull **** Manafort. Manafort might be looking for a deal where Mueller might introduce lubricant into the equation though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom