Cont: Mueller Investigation pt3

Status
Not open for further replies.
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
You could just cite your sources and debate honestly.
Click to expand...

I did cite my sources.
I linked to my sources.
I asked whether you were able to add them.
I then took the figures from the cite and the link.
I asked what 3.5 plus 4.2 was (7.7)

I am certain that the deliberate obtuse act ain’t working for you.
 
The Big Dog said:
Weird, you totally cut out the part where I asked YOU for a citation.

Pro tip: if one is going to link to lies with zero comment, one is adopting those lies and Seth’s lies become one’s own lies.

Addition, 7.7 plus 9 plus million as of March 2018.

Thanks The Big Dog
Click to expand...

Golly where is The Big Dog getting those figures from, so baffling!

Dream thread
 
acbytesla said:
Warren can't win ANYTHING trying to prove with a DNA test that she has some native American blood in her. By even dignifying such a suggestion is playing into their game.

******* NOBODY is deciding on Warren's suitability to hold office on this so who gives a flying ****!

If someone even brought it up to me. I'd say go away until they want to discuss something that matters.
Click to expand...

Doesn't "I won't dignify that with a response" almost always mean "I have something to hide"?
 
I haven't bothered to follow the links yet - it was simply the assertion that they were as accurate as your legal knowledge that raised a red flag to me.

What I haven't seen is where the additional $9 million came from in your link.
 
BrooklynBaby said:
Doesn't "I won't dignify that with a response" almost always mean "I have something to hide"?
Click to expand...
For those who've already determined their conclusion, I suppose.

Beyond that, we have bigger problems in this country than convening a tribunal to determine the veracity of some rather inconsequential trivia of family lore from several generations past.
 
The Big Dog said:
Golly where is The Big Dog getting those figures from, so baffling!

Dream thread
Click to expand...

Neither of the figures of 3.546 or 5.476 are in the documents you've linked. This is why I've asked you to cite where you're getting them from and/or quote the relevant parts.

Instead you'd prefer to dance around like a jester, for reasons best know to yourself.
 
jimbob said:
I haven't bothered to follow the links yet - it was simply the assertion that they were as accurate as your legal knowledge that raised a red flag to me.

What I haven't seen is where the additional $9 million came from in your link.
Click to expand...

Great, you were able to calculate the $7.7 million figure. It was trivially easy wasn't it?

The $9 million plus figure is derived from the DOJ Component Expenses end notes.

Bit ridiculous that our posters claim that they can't figure it out right?
 
Squeegee Beckenheim said:
Neither of the figures of 3.546 or 5.476 are in the documents you've linked. This is why I've asked you to cite where you're getting them from and/or quote the relevant parts.

Instead you'd prefer to dance around like a jester, for reasons best know to yourself.
Click to expand...

Golly, can't figure that out either?

Hee hee!
 
Babbylonian said:
It's not counter-productive to have nobody willing to lie to the FBI.
Click to expand...

This is naive. If you misremember something, then you can get in trouble. If the FBI concludes that the truth is something other than you think it is, you can get in trouble. If the FBI is wrong about what the truth is, you can get in trouble. Just telling the truth doesn't actually suffice to protect you. Only not talking does.
 
autumn1971 said:
I can only assume that you and Zig are indignant and horrified by Clinton’s impeachment and have said so on this forum.

Oh, wait, it’s only if it’s a Republican.

Reading these posts I can feel what hypocrisy tastes like. I don’t like it, apparently y’all do.
Click to expand...

Clinton's impeachment happened before I joined this forum, so it's never been that much of a topic of discussion. But setting aside your hyperbole, you're wrong. I think impeaching Clinton was a mistake.

Reading your posts, I can feel what naked partisanship tastes like. I don't like it, apparently you do.
 
The Big Dog said:
The $9 million plus figure is derived from the DOJ Component Expenses end notes.
Click to expand...

There we go! Christ, that was like getting blood out of a stone. Well done. You have finally contributed something useful to the discussion.

So, rather than Trump's golf trips costing ten times as much as the Mueller probe, they've only cost four and a half times as much. Good to know.

It's amazing how conversations can actually be facilitated when you simply provide sources honestly, isn't it? You might want to try it without capering around like a fool, next time.
 
Short Seth Abramson thread on Papadopoulos

Perhaps most relevant to a couple of recent posts:

7/ Anyone who says Papadopoulos got 14 days because he wasn't central to the Trump-Russia case is WRONG. Anyone who says that making false statements is all Papadopoulos ever did wrong is WRONG. He helped the government—but he was pissy about it—so he got 14 days instead of none.
Click to expand...

More details in the thread itself.
 
BrooklynBaby said:
Doesn't "I won't dignify that with a response" almost always mean "I have something to hide"?
Click to expand...

Only to a moron. But I never said to use that line only not to do it.

Maybe she is hiding that she was a Russian hooker who put on a golden shower show for Trump?

Not every question made up by Republican nutjobs deserves an answer.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom