• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Mr Lyte, will you please answer this..

Undesired Walrus said:
Here we go Lyte. http://www.vaed.uscourts.gov/notablecases/moussaoui/exhibits/prosecution/P200045.html

You are saying these people never died in the pentagon, that they didn't endure a horrific death by having a hijacker crash their bodies into a building. That is what you are saying Lyte. And why? Becuase you believe it? No. You want to believe it, so you go get a bit of recognition just like Avery. But guess what? Being Avery is one thing, wanting to be like Avery is the bottom, bottom of the ladder...

Real people died Lyte. Real people. You are saying those photo's are fake and not someone's relatives.

The fact you have not seen them before shows your displacement from the real world.

What's the bets you dont come back to this thread?
Click to expand...

None of those pictures are of passengers.

They were Pentagon employees.

None of those pictures are of airline seats and no proof of such a thing exists.

Williams was either mistaken about this just like you, innocently embellishing, or lying.
 
Pardalis said:
You can't prove a negative. You prove that it was, that's how it works.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

He is the one suggesting that I claimed such a thing definitively when I did not.

Therefore it is his responsibility to prove that I made the claim or revise his inaccurate statement.
 
Lyte Trip said:
No one planted debris. Do you have proof it wasn't blown from the construction storage trailer near the two cars?
Click to expand...

Ahhh, I see how this game works!

Do you have proof it wasn't placed by little green leprechauns wearing pink bow-ties?

Do you have proof it didn't fall from the sky during an invisible meteor shower with meteors which were made out of aircraft parts?

Do you have proof that you're not Elvis?
 
Lyte Trip said:
Wrong.

He is the one suggesting that I claimed such a thing definitively when I did not.

Therefore it is his responsibility to prove that I made the claim or revise his inaccurate statement.
Click to expand...

Wrong.

If he misrepresented your claims, then that is a strawman (something you seem to have trouble grasping).

You did not ask him to prove you made the claim, you asked him to prove the debris was not ejected from a trailer during an explosion.

So, Mr. Lyte, how do you explain the debris? With evidence, please.
 
Lyte Trip said:
None of those pictures are of passengers.

They were Pentagon employees.

None of those pictures are of airline seats and no proof of such a thing exists.

Williams was either mistaken about this just like you, innocently embellishing, or lying.
Click to expand...
How do you know this? What makes you qualified to make these statements?
Give me the identity of the people in the pictures. Do you know? If not, then you are in no position to make any definitive statements. Period. If you do, you are lying, plain and simple.
 
I have proof the plane was on the north side of the gas station.

This proves the plane did not cause the physical damage.

Feel free to hypothesize about how the debris got there all you want but don't put words in my mouth and demand me to explain them.
 
Lyte Trip said:
I have proof the plane was on the north side of the gas station.
Click to expand...

No, you dont!

This proves the plane did not cause the physical damage.
Click to expand...

It does no such thing

Feel free to hypothesize about how the debris got there all you want but don't put words in my mouth and demand me to explain them.
Click to expand...

Umm....

No one planted debris. Do you have proof it wasn't blown from the construction storage trailer near the two cars?
Click to expand...
 
JimBenArm said:
How do you know this? What makes you qualified to make these statements?
Give me the identity of the people in the pictures. Do you know? If not, then you are in no position to make any definitive statements. Period. If you do, you are lying, plain and simple.
Click to expand...

Well all people connected to the government are liars. Duh!

Those damn firefighters, soldiers, and policemen. Scum of the earth I tell you. You can't trust anything they say. /end sarc
 
JamesB said:
Well all people connected to the government are liars. Duh!

Those damn firefighters, soldiers, and policemen. Scum of the earth I tell you. You can't trust anything they say. /end sarc
Click to expand...
Boy, do I feel dumb! I knew that!
 
Lyte Trip said:
I have proof the plane was on the north side of the gas station.
Click to expand...
Wow circular reasoning, I never saw that coming. :rolleyes:

Q. What happened: A. The plane flew north of the Citgo.
Q. What proof do you have: A: The physical evidence proves it
Q: What proof do you have of your physical evidence claims: A: The plane flew north of the Citgo.
 
Lyte Trip said:
I have proof the plane was on the north side of the gas station.
Click to expand...
er...um...
No.
Lyte Trip said:
This proves the plane did not cause the physical damage..
Click to expand...
er...um...
No.
see above
Lyte Trip said:
Feel free to hypothesize about how the debris got there all you want but don't put words in my mouth and demand me to explain them.
Click to expand...
Originally Posted by Lyte Trip
No one planted debris. Do you have proof it wasn't blown from the construction storage trailer near the two cars?
Click to expand...
 
Just going over Sgt. Legasse's statement found here: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2472903&postcount=255. I noticed this quote:

I have an explosive detection canine with me so, we were kind of busy searching luggage that people, when they were running out of the building just dropped their bags and things like that. We'd get to search all of them before we could declare an area safe.
Click to expand...

Lyte contends that explosives caused the destruction of the Pentagon. Yet, his star witness, Sgt. Legasse had an explosive detecting canine and reported nothing. What is your explanation Lyte?
 
Lyte, in order to convince the fence-sitters you might want to state your expertise in the following areas:


Forensic science, fire science, crime scene investigation, forensic psychology, DNA recovery and analysis, and aeronautical engineering.


I'm sure degrees earned, years of professional experience and articles in academic journals will suffice the doubters.
 
Last edited:
Lyte Trip said:
I have proof the plane was on the north side of the gas station.

This proves the plane did not cause the physical damage.

Feel free to hypothesize about how the debris got there all you want but don't put words in my mouth and demand me to explain them.
Click to expand...

I have proof the plane flew over Llyod England's taxi, given by the man himself and countless, countless other witnesses.

This proves the plane did cause the physical damage of the lamposts and his car.

Feel free to hypothesize about how this idiocy got into your brain all you want but don't say words that hurt real people, and real people's horrific experiences.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom