Most Important Technology for Allies in WW2

That wasn't the question: It was "(something that either "won" the war for us, or at least gave us an edge to win the war sooner.)"./
No, it was a better question.
The Germans had better technology in essentially every category. It was how people used what they had, and kept up, that won the war, not any single technology.
Nuclear weapons?
Radar?
Sonar?
Computers?
Piston fighter aircraft?
Landing craft?
Carriers?
Battleships?

Sorry.
 
To this and the other responses to me; The Germans had jet fighters.

That would fit into the superior high speed aerodynamics field. Nonetheless, the Allies had vastly superior engines that didn't burn out after 10 hours, making the Meteor at least equal as an actual weapons system. And the P-80 which didn't quite make it to combat and the British Vampire shortly after were the first to have engines in the fuselage and thus have greatly superior roll and turn rate, and also where greatly superior Allied engines overpowered German aerodynamics even in straight flight.

they had night fighters guided by radar

And German nightfighters were both greatly inferior in performance (compared with say, the Mosquito), and had greatly inferior radar, requiring big aerials that degraded performance further.

they had better tanks

They had heavier tanks, that were grossly underpowered, fuel hogs, and unreliable. Not to mention too expensive to mass produce leading Panzer Divisions to continue relying on the medium Pz IV during the entire war. The Pz IV which was notably inferior to either the Sherman or the T-34.

they had the best conventional air fighters

Flat out false, as Allied fighters generally had equal performance but vastly greater range and reliability.

they had cruise missiles, ballistic missiles

Both practically worthless...

they had optically guided bombs

Yes, primitive and easily jammed MCLOS weapons, compared to the Allies, who were able to mass produce TV-guided bombs, and the BAT radar guided glide bomb.

they had very good infantry weapons

The army that had to rely on the ancient K98 as its primary rifle compared with the Americans who issued everyone and their mother a semi-auto Garand or the superb M1 carbine?

they were working on fission weapons

And getting nowhere due to getting the basic math wrong. Compared to the Allies who actually produced fission weapons....

They lost because they were out numbered and out smarted strategically.

They lost because they picked a fight with enemies who had more of everything. Everything including scientists, engineers, companies specializing in electronics, chemistry, etc.

Look at the NACA laminar flow wing for instance. German scientists could never have done the calculations since there weren't enough of them with good enough equipment. Had they done the calculations, they still would have found it impossible to mass produce without American production tech and mass resources. So the Americans were able to put high efficiency wings on the P-51 allowing it to escort bombers all the way to Berlin, while the Germans could not because the Americans had more of everything.
 
To this and the other responses to me; The Germans had jet fighters, they had night fighters guided by radar, they had better tanks, they had the best conventional air fighters, they had cruise missiles, ballistic missiles; they had optically guided bombs, they had very good infantry weapons, they were working on fission weapons; and they had stupid leaders who didn't know how to make the most of their science.

They lost because they were out numbered and out smarted strategically.

OK, I will give one technology, probably already mentioned, and that was code breaking, but I wouldn't say that by itself won the war.

What won the war was the resources of the USA.
The German ballistic and cruise missiles were basically unguided and had negligable military effect. They killed a few people, but that's pretty easy.
German small arms were basically equal to the other combatants, better in some areas, worse in others.
German jet fighters were faster than Allied aircraft but had little endurance, required long runways and were introduced too late to be a winning weapon. Better reconaissance jets might have had more impact on the course of the war.
As for your claim that Germany had "the best conventional air fighters", I'd like to see some evidence.
Guided bombs were also used by the United States, to more effect than German weapons.
Germany's nuclear weapons programme was a joke; poor leadership, politicised science and fundamental mistakes would not have developed a nuclear bomb. I refer you to the 'Farm Hall' transcripts. German chemical weapons were more advanced than the Allies, however these were not used.
Oh, don't forget the Soviet Union; it produced a lot of material too.
 
Hedy Lamarr invented the idea of frequency hopping which directly lead to the spread spectrum communication system we use today.

She came up with the idea to prevent the germans from jamming RF controlled torpedos.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr

She was one smart cookie with looks to match!
Once, when I worked for a certain like IT multinational, I stuck up a picture of her in the lab area. Not one of the networks people had heard of her ideas, despite their relevence to 802.11 and cellular communications.:(
 
Once, when I worked for a certain like IT multinational, I stuck up a picture of her in the lab area. Not one of the networks people had heard of her ideas, despite their relevence to 802.11 and cellular communications.:(

Do you think they'd recognize Grace Hopper? (Due credit to Heddy, but Adm. Hopper was the real wizard of the two.)
 
Hedy Lamarr invented the idea of frequency hopping which directly lead to the spread spectrum communication system we use today.
She came up with the idea to prevent the germans from jamming RF controlled torpedos.
She was one smart cookie with looks to match!

Yeah but wasn't she involved in the plot to take over the town of Rock Ridge?
 
www.radarpages.co.uk covers RAF Radar from WW2 till today.

German Radar was equal in some ways to British sets at the start of the war but they fell behind very quickly. Britain developed the Cavity Magnetron which it shared with the USA. This allowed for centimetric and microwave radar. British Night Fighters were faster and better equipped than German adversaries as their sets and antenna were smaller and had a higher definition. Bombers were fitted with tail warning sets that could pick up incoming Night Fighters and alert the gunners. Ships had effective gunnery radar that could lay the guns onto target and direct AA fire. On land AA Batteries had radar sets that also directed the guns onto target. Fighters and bombers were fitted with IFF that identified them to friendly Radar. In addition to Radar, at sea Escort and AS ships had High Frequency Direction Finders (Huffduff) that gave an automatic bearing to a radio signal displayed on Radar Style display allowing escort ships to home in on any U-Boat that transmitted within seconds. VHF Radio Telephones were fitted to ships so that their Captains and their Ops rooms could directly talk to each other and co-ordinate attacks. (something we now take for granted but it was a secret weapon at the time)
 
What ever the Allies did regarding radar, was due to the diligence of Maxwell, Hertz, Marconi, Huelsmeyer and Tesla.
 
To this and the other responses to me; The Germans had jet fighters...


Yes, but they were not without disadvantages: they were slow to accelerate, they were relatively short-ranged, and the engines suffered from some reliability problems. While certainly their great speed made them difficult to catch in the air, the Allies soon found tactics to counter the jets: identify the bases from which they operated, prowl around the area looking for jet fighters returning, then shoot them down with ease as they were on their landing approaches and highly vulnerable.


...they had night fighters guided by radar...


So did the Allies. Indeed, the Allies had the first purpose-built night-fighter in the world: the P-61 Black Widow, which was an outstanding design. (It was powered by a pair of Pratt & Whitney R-2800 engines.)


...they had the best conventional air fighters...


Highly debatable. It depends entirely on what models of which aircraft you are comparing. There were some outstanding designs on both the Allied and Axis sides. Personally, I'd easily take an F4U Corsair over the Me 109 or Fw 190.
 
And German nightfighters were both greatly inferior in performance (compared with say, the Mosquito), and had greatly inferior radar, requiring big aerials that degraded performance further.


In fairness, the He 219 was an excellent night-fighter design. There just weren't enough of them.

The one thing was that decidely superior in the German night-fighter force was the Schräge Musik cannon installation, which was used to deadly effect, exploiting the blind spot on RAF bombers. Bomber Command didn't suspect of the existence of such upward-firing guns for a long time.
 
Do you think they'd recognize Grace Hopper? (Due credit to Heddy, but Adm. Hopper was the real wizard of the two.)

I remember Admrial Hopper very well. I really liked her method of explaining to less tech oriented military leaders and senators why there were time lag delays in satellite communication.
She used to hand out short lengths of wire and explain that that that was the length an RF wave traveled in one nanosecond.

One VERY smart cookie.
 
Due credit to Grace, but I think they'd much rather have a picture of Heddy.

On any given day.
goodmorning.gif
 
Do you think they'd recognize Grace Hopper? (Due credit to Heddy, but Adm. Hopper was the real wizard of the two.)

No disrespect to Adm. Hopper but her parents must have been having a giggle when they filled out the paperwork to register her birth.



 

Back
Top Bottom