Mossad agent arrested in Hamas assassination case

[Thunder]

is bigjelampro still denying the great possibility that Israel did snuff this Hamas guy out?

wow.

 

[funk de fino]

is bigjelampro still denying the great possibility that Israel did snuff this Hamas guy out?

wow.

Its hard to tell when he flip flops between defending them and then saying they never did it.

 

[bigjelmapro]

OK, so you cant read.

So you can't use the word. Check.

Why answer in the first place?

You mean why deflect?

Fail again. In our own country. Big difference.

Not in uniform. All I had to establish. Can you see a trend?

You never gave Interpol evidence then?

Has Interpol classified this guy as a terrorist? Nope.

Yes, an innocent.

Pensioners are dangerous though. Gotta watch out for those.

You answered. Incorrectly as well.

Didn't bite on your deflection.

Usually they do not need any papers in your own country. Epic fail. Why have fake passports?

Why not? Entering an Arab country with Israeli passports is what you propose I take it. Hence why you cannot fathom the concept and standard practice of intelligence agencies.

Apples and oranges and you know it. This is not about killing in ANOTHER country.

So you missed the articles.

If it is not illegal then why are Interpol chasing them?

Probably an issue with passports more than a targetted killing. Otherwise you would have Interpol chasing US agents and those outsourced on a wanted list as well. Oh yes, but Interpol still lists this terrorist filth as a 'Hamas official', how quaint.

Lieberman is not happy at the PM and FS eh?

Another Gaza-wall sort of deflection deflection?

Arrogance noted.

Comical.

Yes, some real hawks in your govt.

As with yours, so what?

 

[bigjelmapro]

Its hard to tell when he flip flops between defending them and then saying they never did it.

Those are two different things. To defend if mossad or any other intelligence agency killed a known terrorist and actually connecting said intelligence agency to this incident.

Difficult to fathom?

 

[Thunder]

Bigjel- why do you still deny that Israel did it...when you seem to think it was such a wonderful thing to do?

 

[The Fool]

Its hard to tell when he flip flops between defending them and then saying they never did it.

stuck in the denial trap. He reflex denied it when it first happened Once he has denied it he is stuck with that forever no matter how much evidence comes out. Its quite amazing but I'm not even sure that an Israeli admission would move him

 

[funk de fino]

stuck in the denial trap. He reflex denied it when it first happened Once he has denied it he is stuck with that forever no matter how much evidence comes out. Its quite amazing but I'm not even sure that an Israeli admission would move him

I dont think an admission would either. It is rare to find a lack of logic as blatant outside the 911 section.

 

[bigjelmapro]

Classic. Two peas in a pod.

How's TF's backlogs argument going in the other thread eh?

Once the evidence is presented that goes beyond the circumstancial, by all means, there will be acceptance that this was a mossad job. Which at this point it simply hasn't been the case.

Funk already fell off his horse, so he's pretty irrelevant.

Love the denial skit though.

 

[DC]

Classic. Two peas in a pod.

How's TF's backlogs argument going in the other thread eh?

Once the evidence is presented that goes beyond the circumstancial, by all means, there will be acceptance that this was a mossad job. Which at this point it simply hasn't been the case.

Funk already fell off his horse, so he's pretty irrelevant.

Love the denial skit though.

lol your like a mafia boss that is proud the cops dont have evidence against him.

the acceptance is there already, its just a question if justified or not.

 

[bigjelmapro]

lol your like a mafia boss that is proud the cops dont have evidence against him.

Nice failed correlation.

Problem is, the 'cops' in this situation refused to acknowledge that this was a known terrorist, killed Israelis and presented him as a supposed government official.

Entertaining though.

the acceptance is there already, its just a question if justified or not.

Who is it accepted by? The only evidence presented was that passports were either photocopied in an Israeli embassy or airport.

If only you and the others would apply this circumstantial evidence against other threads, say, the MM thread, where there's copious amounts of solid evidence against the 'activists', but you refuse to aknowledge any sort of guilt on the 'activists' part.

But I see that you've abandoned that thread as well for obvious reasons....

 

[funk de fino]

Why not? Entering an Arab country with Israeli passports is what you propose I take it. Hence why you cannot fathom the concept and standard practice of intelligence agencies.

This is black hole style density. I propose nothing of the sort.

The UK forces were under cover in their own country. Not with fake passports. They do not need passports in their own country.

Your guys were in another country with fake passports. If you want to create havoc do it in your own backyard, do not do it illegally in other peoples countries. And that goes for Hamas too. Keep your sorry mess to yoursleves.

OK?

 

[DC]

Nice failed correlation.

Problem is, the 'cops' in this situation refused to acknowledge that this was a known terrorist, killed Israelis and presented him as a supposed government official.

Entertaining though.

So you think you have a right to go into other peoples countries and kill people you accuse of being terrorists?

Who is it accepted by? The only evidence presented was that passports were either photocopied in an Israeli embassy or airport.

If only you and the others would apply this circumstantial evidence against other threads, say, the MM thread, where there's copious amounts of solid evidence against the 'activists', but you refuse to aknowledge any sort of guilt on the 'activists' part.

But I see that you've abandoned that thread as well for obvious reasons....

nice try, but fail.

you should have picked the Iran nuclear program as i am not convinced they produce nukes.

but about the MM, i didn't even call them peace activists. (also not in this silly way you do, to discredit all peace activists)

Dont start with lies pls. I have not abandoned that thread. When you would reread it you would see that from my first post on i was not in favor of the activists violence.......

but nicely done, most people don't know, so now that makes me look so bad. grats. liar.

 

[Mycroft]

So you think you have a right to go into other peoples countries and kill people you accuse of being terrorists?

Let me ask you this;

If the United States found OBL hiding out somewhere in Qatar, and Qatar treating him as a diplomat rather than a criminal, would you object to a CIA team taking him out in a similar way?

 

[bigjelmapro]

This is black hole style density. I propose nothing of the sort.

That's the problem, you refuse to propose anything other than going on about the moral issue of killing someone and using fake passports, which is contradicted below...

The UK forces were under cover in their own country. Not with fake passports. They do not need passports in their own country.

First uniform, second innocent, since the previous failed, the own country skit. Avoiding the dangerous pensioner British agents killed.

The problem is that you refuse to acknowledge that this terrorist evaded arrest several times in addition to being taken out in our own 'backyard'.

Once you acknowledge that all the options were exhausted and this terrorist still posed a clear and present danger to Israel and its citizens, then we might be getting somewhere.

Your guys were in another country with fake passports. If you want to create havoc do it in your own backyard, do not do it illegally in other peoples countries. And that goes for Hamas too. Keep your sorry mess to yoursleves.

What havoc?

If this terrorist didn't make it to Dubai, then there wouldn't be a need to track him down and put him down like a dog.

 

[bigjelmapro]

So you think you have a right to go into other peoples countries and kill people you accuse of being terrorists?

If all other options were exhausted, yes. With the lack of collateral damage, double yes. And this terrorist admitted to killing Israelis, gloated about it and posed above the dead bodies of Israelis, so there's no 'you accuse'.

you should have picked the Iran nuclear program as i am not convinced they produce nukes.

Then take it up there in the thread, which you didn't respond to when presented with IAEA reports about the questionable nature of Iran's nuclear program and its past projects. Last thing I remember from that thread is that you played the 'its my opinion' angle.

but about the MM, i didn't even call them peace activists. (also not in this silly way you do, to discredit all peace activists)

Never said you did. The latter bit about discrediting, I didn't do either. Anything else you would like to add or you just going to act like TF now?

Dont start with lies pls. I have not abandoned that thread. When you would reread it you would see that from my first post on i was not in favor of the activists violence.......

You've deflected, you avoided answering questions when faced with evidence, hence my conclusion that you abandoned the OP of the thread. Not that difficult to follow.

Whinging about lies now as well when all of the unfounded accusations from above are a figment of your imagination.

but nicely done, most people don't know, so now that makes me look so bad. grats. liar.

To who? Parky, TF and Funk? Wow, I feel horrible.

 

[DC]

If all other options were exhausted, yes. With the lack of collateral damage, double yes. And this terrorist admitted to killing Israelis, gloated about it and posed above the dead bodies of Israelis, so there's no 'you accuse'.


Then take it up there in the thread, which you didn't respond to when presented with IAEA reports about the questionable nature of Iran's nuclear program and its past projects. Last thing I remember from that thread is that you played the 'its my opinion' angle.


Never said you did. The latter bit about discrediting, I didn't do either. Anything else you would like to add or you just going to act like TF now?


You've deflected, you avoided answering questions when faced with evidence, hence my conclusion that you abandoned the OP of the thread. Not that difficult to follow.

Whinging about lies now as well when all of the unfounded accusations from above are a figment of your imagination.


To who? Parky, TF and Funk? Wow, I feel horrible.

talking about imagination.........

show me what questions i avoided to answer.

ETA: And funny thing is, the IAEA did not conclude what you concluded from their reports, because they have no evidence, while you came to the conclusion without evidence.

 

[bigjelmapro]

talking about imagination.........

show me what questions i avoided to answer.

Go to said thread, see my post, see your lack of post and the 'its my opinion' skit. Rinse. Repeat.

ETA: And funny thing is, the IAEA did not conclude what you concluded from their reports, because they have no evidence, while you came to the conclusion without evidence.

Never made a conclusion, merely an assessment. You, however, disregard this outright without defending why you disagreed.

 

[DC]

Go to said thread, see my post, see your lack of post and the 'its my opinion' skit. Rinse. Repeat.


Never made a conclusion, merely an assessment. You, however, disregard this outright without defending why you disagreed.

ah you are confusing 2 different threads....

no wonder, that happens a lot to black and white thinkers.

 

[bigjelmapro]

ah you are confusing 2 different threads....

no wonder, that happens a lot to black and white thinkers.

Rinse. Repeat meant that you used the same tactics in the those threads.

And sorry, judging by your half-baked correlations/comparisons/etc. that are obviously not fully thought through, I would suggest you look at yourself before accusing someone else of being a 'black and white thinker.

 

[funk de fino]

That's the problem, you refuse to propose anything other than going on about the moral issue of killing someone and using fake passports, which is contradicted below...

This is a lie. I propose you do it in your own backyard. I have posted this any times.

First uniform, second innocent, since the previous failed, the own country skit. Avoiding the dangerous pensioner British agents killed.

Sorry, that is not English. Try again.

The problem is that you refuse to acknowledge that this terrorist evaded arrest several times in addition to being taken out in our own 'backyard'

It is not our fault if your side is incompetent.

Once you acknowledge that all the options were exhausted and this terrorist still posed a clear and present danger to Israel and its citizens, then we might be getting somewhere.

Not all options were exhausted, that sounds like another tall tale from you.

What havoc?

Nothing to see here eh? No international fracas?

If this terrorist didn't make it to Dubai, then there wouldn't be a need to track him down and put him down like a dog.

You are so tough.