More Truther Legaltainment!

I think we're all agreed on the fact that what he's accused of is sickening.

I don't see anyone laughing about the alleged crime itself in this thread.

The reason no-one else is under the concern bridge over this truther goat's "crime" is that he hasn't been convicted yet.
 
Zeuzzz said:
Define thier 'logic and decision making' traits, and link them to child molestation.
Click to expand...


Extremely poor.

Zeuzzz said:
I find what he did sickening. The fact he's in jail is what criminals like this deserve. I concur, the fact hes been locked up is brilliant.
Click to expand...


Now, now... He hasn't even had his trial yet and here you are deciding that he's guilty. Hell, he's not even in jail; he's under house arrest. Perhaps the thing you should actually be concerning yourself with is your apparent inability to pay attention.
 
Last edited:
So he hasn't even been convicted yet and still has deserved an entire thread here on jref about him and his links to truthers. I thought this forum was supposed to be about 9/11 conspiracy theories, not a place to post information on potential child molestors. Again, this thread is just plain bizzarre in my view, and judging from a lot of peoples input here it really makes me wonder if people are really looking for the truth or just taking pleasure out of bashing truthers ad hominem style via stereotype and every logical fallacy possible.
 
Last edited:
Good point, Zeuzz. What is this thread doing here?

BTW, I didn't realize this entire thread was about one person. :eye-poppi Pathetic.

Where are the threads on Lucky Larry's ongoing, never-ending WTC litigation?
 
ergo said:
Good point, Zeuzz. What is this thread doing here?

BTW, I didn't realize this entire thread was about one person. :eye-poppi Pathetic.

Where are the threads on Lucky Larry's ongoing, never-ending WTC litigation?
Click to expand...

Start one if you want one. Maybe a thread about him making out like a bandit.
 
Zeuzzz said:
So he hasn't even been convicted yet and still has deserved an entire thread here on jref about him and his links to truthers. I thought this forum was supposed to be about 9/11 conspiracy theories, not a place to post information on potential child molestors. Again, this thread is just plain bizzarre in my view, and judging from a lot of peoples input here it really makes me wonder if people are really looking for the truth or just taking pleasure out of bashing truthers ad hominem style via stereotype and every logical fallacy possible.
Click to expand...

You say that like that's a bad thing.

:j2:
 
Zeuzzz said:
So he hasn't even been convicted yet and still has deserved an entire thread here on jref about him and his links to truthers.
Click to expand...

Yep a whole entire thread, 1 out of 180 904 at last count.


I thought this forum was supposed to be about 9/11 conspiracy theories, not a place to post information on potential child molestors.
Click to expand...

When a visible 9/11 conspiracy theorist engages in deplorable behavior, I think
it's worth noting. If one claims to be seeking the truth, questions about their character are more than valid. Do you not care that a person speaking for the truth movement molests children?


Again, this thread is just plain bizzarre in my view, and judging from a lot of peoples input here it really makes me wonder if people are really looking for the truth or just taking pleasure out of bashing truthers ad hominem style via stereotype and every logical fallacy possible.
Click to expand...

We've all known the truth for quite some time, there is no need to 'look' for it any longer.


The bolded part is untrue and shows you're not very good at critical thinking.
 
Zeuzzz said:
It is a bad thing, for you. If you have to resort to fallacies and Ad Homs it means your side of the argument is loosing.
Click to expand...

No argument is being made in this thread so I don't see how there's any win/lose to be had here.
 
ergo said:
Good point, Zeuzz. What is this thread doing here?

BTW, I didn't realize this entire thread was about one person. :eye-poppi Pathetic.

Where are the threads on Lucky Larry's ongoing, never-ending WTC litigation?
Click to expand...

So you don't care that a visable member of the truth movement molests children?

Doesn't surprise me really.
 
ergo said:
Good point, Zeuzz. What is this thread doing here?

BTW, I didn't realize this entire thread was about one person. :eye-poppi Pathetic.

Where are the threads on Lucky Larry's ongoing, never-ending WTC litigation?
Click to expand...

Of course you agree with Zeuzz. Of course.
 
Zeuzzz said:
I find what he did sickening. The fact he's in jail is what criminals like this deserve. I concur, the fact hes been locked up is brilliant.
Click to expand...

Zeuzzz said:
So he hasn't even been convicted yet and still has deserved an entire thread here on jref about him and his links to truthers. I thought this forum was supposed to be about 9/11 conspiracy theories, not a place to post information on potential child molestors. Again, this thread is just plain bizzarre in my view, and judging from a lot of peoples input here it really makes me wonder if people are really looking for the truth or just taking pleasure out of bashing truthers ad hominem style via stereotype and every logical fallacy possible.
Click to expand...

So, you find out Manny hasn't been convicted and the first thing you do is whine about debunkers, not apologise to him for what you said earlier. Interesting.

Firstly, this shows you haven't even read the thread you're complaining about. If you had read it, you would know the case isn't over.

Secondly, it shows you're the only one who's assumed he's guilty but you choose to sweep that under the rug and start another argument.

Thirdly, it shows you care more about protesting against debunkers than you do about a truther hero. You should have apologised to Manny straight away. Bad form.
 
ergo said:
Good point, Zeuzz. What is this thread doing here?

BTW, I didn't realize this entire thread was about one person. :eye-poppi Pathetic.

Where are the threads on Lucky Larry's ongoing, never-ending WTC litigation?
Click to expand...

There is a thread still going for you to display your inadequate ability to prove unlucky larry has been at fault for anything.

Once again, if you guys don't like it, then don't visit it. For stupid, you make time at multiple points in your day to come here and complain that a thread is going that you don't agree with. Then post in another thread, don't come here, no one is forcing you to post here.

If you think it's "pathetic" or a "waste of time" then just...straight...up...ignore it. How hard is that? Whining about it isn't going to delete the thread, and if you're that worried about this guys image, than help him. Post things to the contrary. Find out more about him, find out the details, email him for his side of the story, do research.

Let's be honest here, there was an accusation on Dr. Jim Millette (the individual doing the testing on the dust) and all the "debunkers" went and researched it to make sure it wasn't justified. I didn't hear any truther or debunker complain about how pathetic it was that the claims were being made.

What it boils down to is this guy has made it a point to join the truther movement. He also has gone out of his way to help represent the truther movement by being vocal. He then gets accused of having some form of relations with children. This speaks directly to his character. Plain and simple.
 
Last edited:
Larry reminds me of my grandad. We took out fire insurance on his farm a month before a forest fire burnt half his stables to the ground. Insurance agencies interrogated him so hard you'd think he had committed a crime himself by merely getting the insurance he needed.

I'm no expert on the Larry.S fiasco, but i'm sure he was interrogated just as thoroughly by the insurance companies as anyone else who gets high value insurance returns in a short time. Such investigations are extremely thorough, and fully publicly available on request (at least in the uk), unless it goes as far as court and into the legal system. I think this thread is going to get funnier and more revealing with every page of posts from now on.


Meanwhile, have we found out any more trends yet in this child molestation + truther implication yet?

I heard that one of my old primary teachers is now (rightly) behind bars for taking a substantial amount of indecent pictures of underage children, maybe we should advise the local police to check his house for thermitic precursors?
 
Zeuzzz said:
Meanwhile, have we found out any more trends yet in this child molestation + truther implication yet?
Click to expand...

strawman.png

(Again. :oldroll:)

Still no apology for Manny?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom