More GOP obsession with rape (and incest)

For the conservative/GOP/Christian males out there, here's a handy-dandy flowchart to assist you.


206066_428603490514600_1850050214_n.jpg
 
Why we beat around the bush when it is obvious what they really want is to make women have their sin babies so as to better control sex in general is beyond me.
 
This is incorrect. Progressive Radio pundits talk about rape every single day and not only that, each one during the day does it show after show after show. The idea that the GOP is obcessed with it is wrong.
 
The GOP is obsessed with taking away women's rights. The Democrats are obsessed with preserving them.
 
magellan said:
I see your problem: you hear "family values" and you think that means "family values"
It's actually code for "male privilege". If you substitute "family values" for "male privilege" it suddenly, almost magically becomes internally consistent.
Click to expand...

I saw some yard signs on the way home tonight that said something like "Vote for Values"

And I started thinking, what are my values? And what came into my mind was the old song from catholic church days, "Whatsoever you do to the least of my brothers, that you do unto me" (I know it's a bible verse, but couldn't tell you which gospel it's in)

I thought about it in the context of the Mourdock/Donnally race for the Senate. What is Dick Mourdock's values? Cut medicare, cut social security, cut spending on everything but the military, cut taxes, but be sure to protect those babies that are the result of rape.

Meanwhile, the attack ads against Joe Donnally paint him as a scary liberal who (gasp) voted for ObamaCare and the massive stimulus package. So Donnally voted to expand our healthcare coverage, and to get money into the system to stimulate the economy. I suspect he also voted for the TARP bailout of automakers, which ultimately saved my hometown from ruin (it went through some really tough times). Oh, he's also anti-abortion, but at least makes exceptions for rape and incest (call him inconsistent if you wish, but it's less oppressive; not perfect, of course, but still better than Mourdock).

So given my values of trying to help others, then the choice is obvious - vote for Donnally.

Seriously, what kind of "values" do you have if they lead you to vote for Dick Mourdock? What do you really value? Is "I want to pay lower taxes" really a value? A lower deficit is REALLY something to value? Is "I got mine, screw you lazy losers" your values? If so, then go ahead, vote for him. But let's just suggest that my values and yours do not agree at all.

Yeah, I'll vote my values, which means I'm voting democrat.
 
I just got a phone call from a Democratic Party volunteer urging me to vote for the Democrats this election.

See was very very very obcessed with abortion, rape, incest and fear.

She stressed that if Republicans got into power, they would shut down Planned Parenthood.

When I told her, "you know, sex is not a right. It is not a fundamental right to have inconsequential sex", she shift gears and took the conversation in a different direction. She used fear. She stressed that the USA would become like Brazil with unwanted children in the streets if the Republicans had their way and abortion would be outlawed. She never explained how magically the Republicans could actually do that. She also was wrong about Brazil. The cause of the street children was not because of abortion laws in Brazil.

But her imagery was very good. She described "citizens walking up to children in Brazil and shooting them because they were not wanted".

She was referring to a historic event in Brazil but she got her facts twisted.

Anyway, I never got a phone call from a Republican volutneer who brouht up rape, abortion or sexual issues.
 
RandFan said:
The GOP is obsessed with taking away women's rights. The Democrats are obsessed with preserving them.
Click to expand...

You listen to too much Left Wing propaganda.

You remind me of the Muslims I chat online with who say the Quran is perfect because the Quran says it is perfect.

If you only listen to the propaganda from people who want to convince you to be on their side, you will never see the whole picture. And without the whole picture, you will not see the truth.

Let's cut to the chace. What "right" is the GOP trying to take away?
 
pgwenthold said:
I saw some yard signs on the way home tonight that said something like "Vote for Values"

And I started thinking, what are my values? And what came into my mind was the old song from catholic church days, "Whatsoever you do to the least of my brothers, that you do unto me" (I know it's a bible verse, but couldn't tell you which gospel it's in)

I thought about it in the context of the Mourdock/Donnally race for the Senate. What is Dick Mourdock's values? Cut medicare, cut social security, cut spending on everything but the military, cut taxes, but be sure to protect those babies that are the result of rape.

Meanwhile, the attack ads against Joe Donnally paint him as a scary liberal who (gasp) voted for ObamaCare and the massive stimulus package. So Donnally voted to expand our healthcare coverage, and to get money into the system to stimulate the economy. I suspect he also voted for the TARP bailout of automakers, which ultimately saved my hometown from ruin (it went through some really tough times). Oh, he's also anti-abortion, but at least makes exceptions for rape and incest (call him inconsistent if you wish, but it's less oppressive; not perfect, of course, but still better than Mourdock).

So given my values of trying to help others, then the choice is obvious - vote for Donnally.

Seriously, what kind of "values" do you have if they lead you to vote for Dick Mourdock? What do you really value? Is "I want to pay lower taxes" really a value? A lower deficit is REALLY something to value? Is "I got mine, screw you lazy losers" your values? If so, then go ahead, vote for him. But let's just suggest that my values and yours do not agree at all.

Yeah, I'll vote my values, which means I'm voting democrat.
Click to expand...


Good post!
 
Bill Thompson said:
If you only listen to the propaganda from people who want to convince you to be on their side, you will never see the whole picture. And without the whole picture, you will not see the truth.
Click to expand...


Wow.

FinalIronyMeter.gif




Bill Thompson said:
Let's cut to the chace. What "right" is the GOP trying to take away?
Click to expand...

How about the right for a woman to decide what she wants to do with her body regarding reproductive/childbearing decisions.
 
Bill Thompson said:
You listen to too much Left Wing propaganda.

You remind me of the Muslims I chat online with who say the Quran is perfect because the Quran says it is perfect.

If you only listen to the propaganda from people who want to convince you to be on their side, you will never see the whole picture. And without the whole picture, you will not see the truth.
Click to expand...
Bill, I grew up a conservative. I passionately argued for conservative principles in this forum for nearly a decade. No one on this forum can ever say they've seen both sides the way I can. And I still follow conservatives including Safire, Sullivan and Krauthammer among others so spare me your smarmy condescension. Go look in the mirror you are projecting.

Let's cut to the chace. What "right" is the GOP trying to take away?
Click to expand...
Reproductive rights. The right to choose. The right to decide what happens to their bodies.
 
Bill Thompson said:
When I told her, "you know, sex is not a right.
Click to expand...

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness --The Declaration of Independence

Americans don't have the right to engage in activities that bring them happiness (paraphrased) --Bill Thompson
 
Bill Thompson said:
I just got a phone call from a Democratic Party volunteer urging me to vote for the Democrats this election.

See was very very very obcessed with abortion, rape, incest and fear.

She stressed that if Republicans got into power, they would shut down Planned Parenthood.

When I told her, "you know, sex is not a right. It is not a fundamental right to have inconsequential sex", she shift gears and took the conversation in a different direction. She used fear. She stressed that the USA would become like Brazil with unwanted children in the streets if the Republicans had their way and abortion would be outlawed. She never explained how magically the Republicans could actually do that. She also was wrong about Brazil. The cause of the street children was not because of abortion laws in Brazil.

But her imagery was very good. She described "citizens walking up to children in Brazil and shooting them because they were not wanted".

She was referring to a historic event in Brazil but she got her facts twisted.

Anyway, I never got a phone call from a Republican volutneer who brouht up rape, abortion or sexual issues.
Click to expand...
Did she know how to spell obsessed? That would put her one up on you.

Daredelvis
 
pgwenthold said:
I saw some yard signs on the way home tonight that said something like "Vote for Values"
Click to expand...
In a political context, the Republicans have completely hijacked the word "values". To me, using the ordinary definition of "values" would mean that everyone votes their values. Under the Republican hijack, "values" means "traditional family values" which means, in turn, "god, guns and gays"
 
Bill Thompson said:
I just got a phone call from a Democratic Party volunteer urging me to vote for the Democrats this election.

See was very very very obcessed with abortion, rape, incest and fear.

She stressed that if Republicans got into power, they would shut down Planned Parenthood.

When I told her, "you know, sex is not a right. It is not a fundamental right to have inconsequential sex", she shift gears and took the conversation in a different direction. She used fear. She stressed that the USA would become like Brazil with unwanted children in the streets if the Republicans had their way and abortion would be outlawed. She never explained how magically the Republicans could actually do that. She also was wrong about Brazil. The cause of the street children was not because of abortion laws in Brazil.

But her imagery was very good. She described "citizens walking up to children in Brazil and shooting them because they were not wanted".

She was referring to a historic event in Brazil but she got her facts twisted.

Anyway, I never got a phone call from a Republican volutneer who brouht up rape, abortion or sexual issues.
Click to expand...
All we have to do is look at posts regarding the 19th amendment and know that her fears haven't gone nearly far enough should the retarded mentality displayed there prevail. It's them same exact avenue the Taliban travels to get to shooting 14 year old girls because they want to learn to read. You seem to fit in quit well there, well except the whole moosleem thing
 
Last edited:
RandFan said:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness --The Declaration of Independence

Americans don't have the right to engage in activities that bring them happiness (paraphrased) --Bill Thompson
Click to expand...

In BT's defense, the Declaration of Independence is not a legal document. It was basically just a 'Dear John' letter to Great Britain.
 
pgwenthold said:
I saw some yard signs on the way home tonight that said something like "Vote for Values"

And I started thinking, what are my values? And what came into my mind was the old song from catholic church days, "Whatsoever you do to the least of my brothers, that you do unto me" (I know it's a bible verse, but couldn't tell you which gospel it's in)
...
Click to expand...
.
I wonder about that one also.
It gets ignored all the time.
Almost as universally as the standard Golden Rule gets tossed aside when expedient.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom