bikerdruid
Philosopher
no.Do you believe that Saddam Hussein was a freedom fighter?
no.Do you believe that Saddam Hussein was a freedom fighter?
you're kidding, right?
not remotely.
your post implied that you had absolutely misunderstood my meaning.
i think you should go back and reread it, and the post to which i was replying.
i was stating that the nazis and the kkk were bad guys.
As are Hamas... so why are Hamas "freedom fighters" while the Nazis weren't?
And Hamas are not "bad guys"?i was stating that the nazis and the kkk were bad guys.
They only kill Jews. No big deal.Or, rather, they do kill Christians and gays and women and political opponents, but since they also kill Jews, and killing Jews is good, they're the good guys.
you really need to get a new anthem.
this thread is not about religion.
this thread is not about religion.
The cult of Chomsky has everything to do with religion. It certainly is not based on facts.
wow.
you're just making this stuff up, eh?
By the way. I notice you haven't been able to support your claim of Israel purposefully targeting children or Hamas being defined as "freedom fighters."
All these words, and yet the most important question hasn't been asked, let alone answered: Does Chomsky break open a boiled egg at the big end or the little end?
All these words, and yet the most important question hasn't been asked, let alone answered: Does Chomsky break open a boiled egg at the big end or the little end?
True. That's probably as meaningful as anything else Chomsky thinks, says, and does.
... blather, rinse, repeat. What do you hope to gain by repeating accusations that have been deconstructed and debunked over and over? Cheers from the choir, I suppose, and self-assurance.Well, at least Chomsky did teach us all that the killing fields were just a figament of the colonial fantasy and...
... blather, rinse, repeat. What do you hope to gain by repeating accusations that have been deconstructed and debunked over and over? Cheers from the choir, I suppose, and self-assurance.
True. That's probably as meaningful as anything else Chomsky thinks, says, and does.