Moonbat alert: Chomksy condemns Bin Laden kill.

I note this hilighted word. You didn't use it before. So why now? What does this "moral" fighting consist of? How does it relate to the actual fighting that's going on? Is the actual fighting moral? And do you support the actual fighting?

Did you also note the rest of the sentence, clearly punctuated to indicate that the 'moral' refers to bikerdruid's support? That is, he distinguishes it from the financial support he offers to the three groups he mentioned by making it clear that his support for the rights of palestinians is moral (but not financial).

My apologies if that clarification spoils your fighting fun.
 
For some members of Hamas I'd agree. But I dont think that applies to all in the organization. As illustrated on a previous page, Hamas is a collection of factions some of whom are more "hardcore" than others. Others are pragmatic and less inclined towards violence.
.

The ones that are low on munitions?
 
Indeed! And once we ascertain from their words that we can apply the word "support" to them, we can then understand that they support absolutely everything the object of their support does.

After all, in for an inch you're in for a mile!

You're so right- this is criminal slander!

Now, all we need is for you to identify the posts where these sob's wrote that if you support a group you then support everything that group does.
 
your reading comprehension seems faulty today....:confused:

And you still haven't answered my question. You said,

i do support the struggle of the palestinian people against the oppressive and murderous israeli government.

What do you think this struggle consists of? How can I read this statement as anything other than a support for terrorism? Why would you side with people who want to kill you?

You're like Saberhagen's "goodlife".
 
And you still haven't answered my question. You said,



What do you think this struggle consists of? How can I read this statement as anything other than a support for terrorism? Why would you side with people who want to kill you?

You're like Saberhagen's "goodlife".

i view the israeli army as a terrorist organization, in its treatment of palestinians.
it's just a matter of perspective.
i absolutely support the right of the palestinain people to fight for their freedom from the oppression and murderous tendencies of the israeli government.
 
Last edited:
i view the israeli army as a terrorist organization, in its treatment of palestinians.
it's just a matter of perspective.
i absolutely support the right of the palestinain people to fight for their freedom from the oppression and murderous tendencies of the israeli government.

Thank you for confirming that you side with Islamic terrorists, goodlife.
 
nazis and the kkk are not fighting for the freedom of their families.
the nazis took war to other nations, trying to conquer them.
the palestinians are fighting for their own lives and freedoms.
the analogy fails.

missing the point for 100, Alex.
 
i absolutely support the right of the palestinain people to fight for their freedom from the oppression and murderous tendencies of the israeli government.

And what about the right of the Israeli to defend themselves against terrorist attacks?
 
For some members of Hamas I'd agree. But I dont think that applies to all in the organization. As illustrated on a previous page, Hamas is a collection of factions some of whom are more "hardcore" than others. Others are pragmatic and less inclined towards violence.

You could say the same about the Nazis, some of them had to govern, build roads, take care of business, they weren't all bent on murder, right? The organisation couldn't have worked if all its members had been murderers and thugs. Some of them had to do specific jobs that hadn't anything to do with violence or repression. Does that mean it was OK for someone to support the Nazis because some of them weren't violent? They all adhered to the same philosophy, the same goals.
 
Last edited:
All that being said, to indulge these questions is to indulge a rather silly methodology: I do not think that answering questions with the object of discussion being replaced by "Nazi" or "KKK" is all that worthwhile an approach, and rather moreso the mark of the intellectually lazy.

What I find morally lazy is people who pretend there isn't an analogy to be made between these different hate groups.

Are you comfy between the hammer and the hard place? You seem to enjoy playing the devil's advocate. Are you trying to pretend there isn't a problem with Hamas and their ideology?
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom