Wow, the "Moon Hoax"...
Well, for what it's worth, let me chime in with my own account of "Moon Hoax" belief and skepticism.
Years ago, I obtained a copy of Bill Kaysing's book about the "Moon Hoax". This was years before the popularity of the World Wide Web, so fringe notions were still confined to books, magazines, and 'zines. I liked the book mostly on the grounds that it was fringe and esoteric. I was a big Loompanics fan in those years too... I thought Kaysing's notions were not really supportable, and his thinking didn't make much of an impact on me.
In 2000 or 2001 I read an issue of Fortean Times which had a good article, complete with color photographs, about the "Moon Hoax". This time around, I found myself damn near convinced... At least insofar as I was willing to entertain the notion that NASA had faked certain photographs to "pad" the PR element of the moon landing. I never really doubted that we went to the moon, only that maybe NASA might have faked some photographs. The whole "perspective" and "shadow" arguments really had me going there for a while...
Eventually I found one of the early skeptical rebuttal websites that explained the true nature of the photographs in detail. With a rather large degree of chagrin, I will publicly admit that I bought into elements of the "moon hoax" for a while there.
What do I take away from this little episode?
1. Photographs, on the surface, can have a strong and immediate appeal, especially if a particular interpretation is included with them. Obviously, the authors of the Fortean Times article didn't include any explanations about irregular terrain, or proper perspective.
2. Skepticism almost always lags behind specific claims. If I remember my history from 6 or 7 years ago, it took a bit of time before some of the skeptical websites were created.
3. It's rather intellectually dangerous to only listen to one side of a controversial debate.
4. Eventually, when the "Moon Hoax" claims are shown repeatedly and definitively to be bogus, you begin to wonder how anyone could have taken this stuff seriously in the first place. This is why I describe my former belief system with the term "chagrin".
5. With the Internet and effective search engines, one can cut to the chase rather quickly. You don't have to wait years before stumbling across an effective rebuttal in a book or magazine to some of these far-fetched claims.
Before it goes too far down the memory hole, I'd like to remind people of how quickly the distributed intellegence of various Internet bloggers debunked the bogus documents that Dan Rather and CBS news claimed were real some time back. That could simply not have taken place prior to the World Wide Web.
6. I'm very glad to see Internet based organized skepticism, like that of this JREF board, refuse to allow cranks and crackpots to go unchallenged.
7. I really liked Space Food Sticks, and was very sorry to see them go...