BigAl
Philosopher
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 5,397
Every argument about Molten steel by the debunkers is based in denial of witness accounts and the FACT that the evidence was destroyed.
Second hand and unconfirmable eyewitnesses, some possibly using degrees of hyperbole, simile and metaphor can be dismissed when there is no physical evidence and no hypothesis in physics or chemistry for temperatures necessary for molten steel that is consistent with all the evidence and all the eyewitnesses for the collapse and cleanup.
