This is an add- on to post#
90
@ 1:23 into the video we see firefighters gathered around an apparent light source. I'm confused as to what purpose it serves in advancing your thesis. If the 'steel' is hot enough to be molten, the radiant heat from it wouldn't make it safe for firefighters to simply gather around in one spot right on top of that, at least assuming they didn't want to get cooked in the process.
There is also no date given for that image, as far as we know the light source could very well be totally different than what it is intended to insinuate. Remember that intensive rescue efforts were underway for at least a couple of weeks, is there anything to indicate that the image is not of spot lights or other similar light sources that would have almost certainly been used in the rescue operations?
Bolded portion: Indeed it seems that the picture I referenced here (1 minute and 23 seconds into the video) is
not in any way, shape or form, molten metal. It is an altered picture of the rescue efforts that were under way at the time. In which they used spot lights, flash lights... etc. Here is the original picture:
And it seems I over looked this before... I apologize, allow me to answer what I can:
grizzly i am noticing more frequently your failure to address the point i am making.
And I've noticed your ongoing habit of using unreliable sources of information in your efforts to support your evidence...
the WTC Dust had a unique signature. the question is how the molybdenum was created in the first place. does it always require extreme temperatures as alleged by truthers or can sphericules be formed in lower temperatures?
Some of it was already there... be it from the time of the buildings' construction when the steel was at the mills or otherwise.
why do answer a question with a question? i asked how did the rubble pile generate high temperatures so hot and so soon?
You said:
Morerover rubble piles following conventional demolitions have never produced temperatures sufficient to melt steel. So how did the rubble pile generate these temperatures so hot and so soon?
I was primarily responding to what I bolded in your quote. Your question is an oxymoron... you're trying to establish the premise that the WTC were brought down with therm?te which in turn should account for the hot spots, but you're working without any precedence.
I'm honestly not sure how to word myself to this question of yours... No conventional demolition is ever undertaken whilst a structure is burning, and as of yet you've not pointed out a single example where thermite was used to assist in a full-scale demolition. How exactly do you
expect there to even be hot spots under conventional circumstances? The comparison you are trying to establish just doesn't work...
we know thermite does generate temperatures sufficient to melt steel does it follows if thermite were used in a contolled demolition one would expect to find melted steel.
Which is why i asked you if you could find any kind of precedent of a CD that used it, to which you answered:
and i answered none to my knowledge. so what? why is this point significant?
You stated:
"...it follows if thermite were used in a contolled demolition one would expect to find melted steel"
6 weeks later? 2 days after? you're extrapolating without any prior case that would tell us what one could expect. As you are not able to find precedents, how do
you know what one should expect from a CD done with thermite?
in the end this claim needs to be proven. personally i would like to see a small 4 storey house planted with thermite and watch if it collapses like we saw on 911. i would like to see if molten steel is produced etc.
Better yet, try a steel framed building of any size that iss slated for demolition... the problem of course with your claim thus far is that there is no such example and you're suggesting results which are at this point non-existent in precedence.
Maybe if such an experiment is ever done they can leave the rubble pile there for a few months and see how whether or not thermite can really leave molten metal after a few weeks, although I highly doubt to be possible...
Were any of the buildings in controlled demolitions ever on fire before they sat off their explosive charges? (This might be telling you something)
what is it telling me? spell it out.
See my response... the 5th quote above this.
