Moleculer Side of Homeopathy?

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

I tried to check Subject topic i.e Molecular Side. Since posters here also also odd for it( say odd for everything in homeopathy), there is no logic of any further discussions. Homeopaths will still base their sub-molecular side. It is also in their interest. Hence, I may now go on checking this side, instead.

Bye & thanks.

There's plenty of logic to be had in further discussion but you won't follow logic and accept the conclusions. You have still not explained how merely a 1 in 10 dilution step causes chemicals to reverse their normal chemical action. You have provided no evidence and no rational argument in support of your position.

 

[halleyscomet]

Sorry, You are not capable to judge it.

By whose authority are you making that claim? Your own? That would be like me telling Stephen Hawking he had no grounds for evaluating conflicting ideas about sting theory.

You don't know enough about homeopathy to tell ANYONE if they do or do not have a basis for discussing it. You're a homepathy fangirl at best.

Actually, I recant that. Calling you a homeopathy fangirl is a disservice to fangirls. ACTUAL fangirls know a LOT more about their fandom than you do about homeopathy.

 

[ComfySlippers]

Sorry, You are not capable to judge it.

"Shake some water."

Even an infant can judge that.

 

[Kumar]

There's plenty of logic to be had in further discussion but you won't follow logic and accept the conclusions. You have still not explained how merely a 1 in 10 dilution step causes chemicals to reverse their normal chemical action. You have provided no evidence and no rational argument in support of your position.

No side is A&F. One side show more apparent effects alongwith more side effects. Other side show lesser apparent effects alongwith least direct side effects. Valid Studies are can't be opted due to ethical issues. Live evidences in homeopathic clinics can easily be available. Treatments are given by giving due consideration to limitations, pros & cons. Public at mass, Regulating and government agencies didn't banned it. Hence nothing is odd except perception. We may have to wait & watch till either it die in itself if fake in A&F or science become A&F.

Nothing more than that.

 

[Kumar]

By whose authority are you making that claim? Your own? That would be like me telling Stephen Hawking he had no grounds for evaluating conflicting ideas about sting theory.

You don't know enough about homeopathy to tell ANYONE if they do or do not have a basis for discussing it. You're a homepathy fangirl at best.

Actually, I recant that. Calling you a homeopathy fangirl is a disservice to fangirls. ACTUAL fangirls know a LOT more about their fandom than you do about homeopathy.

Regulating, government agencies and general public at mass are there and they are only the authorites to take relevant decision. We are simply wasting our time. No side had shown A&F outcome either on negative or on positive side. No more waste of time here and on homeopathy since one side look bit odd to me on it.

 

[Kumar]

"Shake some water."

Even an infant can judge that.

Yes infants are judging it.

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

No side is A&F. One side show more apparent effects alongwith more side effects. Other side show lesser apparent effects alongwith least direct side effects. Valid Studies are can't be opted due to ethical issues. Live evidences in homeopathic clinics can easily be available. Treatments are given by giving due consideration to limitations, pros & cons. Public at mass, Regulating and government agencies didn't banned it. Hence nothing is odd except perception. We may have to wait & watch till either it die in itself if fake in A&F or science become A&F.

Nothing more than that.

And still you have not explained how a 1 in 10'dilution of a chemical reverses its normal chemical action. The claims of homeopaths are flatly contradicted by the daily practice of chemical and biological labs. That is A&F, but instead of dealing with it honestly you retreat again behind a wall of deliberately mangled English. I'm sorry, Kumar, but you behave increasingly like a fake.

 

[Mojo]

I tried to check Subject topic i.e Molecular Side. Since posters here also also odd for it( say odd for everything in homeopathy), there is no logic of any further discussions.

You have failed to provide any good evidence that it works. Until you do that there is little to discuss beyond the reasons that people fall into the error of seeing patterns where there are none.

 

[Mojo]

That is A&F, but instead of dealing with it honestly you retreat again behind a wall of deliberately mangled English. I'm sorry, Kumar, but you behave increasingly like a fake.

Superficially and from a distance it looks like English, and Kumar hopes that if he can just get the form right then his ideas will be accepted.

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

Superficially and from a distance it looks like English, and Kumar hopes that if he can just get the form right then his ideas will be accepted.

Are you saying it is almost, but not quite, entirely unlike English?

 

[Mojo]

Cargo cult English, to go with the cargo cult science. The aim is not to communicate but to make it look as if communication is happening.

 

[Carnby]

I'm pretty sure homeopathy does not work at all, or at least it works randomly at a lower level than placebos. The only functioning "alternative medicines" are phytotherapy (though not a "alternative medicine" proper) and acupuncture (only as a painkiller and without accepting traditional Chinese "meridian" schemes).

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

Cargo cult English, to go with the cargo cult science. The aim is not to communicate but to make it look as if communication is happening.

Or 'Kumar' is simply another product brought to us by the good people of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation.

Share and enjoy.

 

[Mojo]

Share and enjoy.

I can only see the upper half of that.

 

[Norman Alexander]

Or 'Kumar' is simply another product brought to us by the good people of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation.

Share and enjoy.

They of the pan-galactic gargle-blaster?

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

I can only see the upper half of that.

That is unfortunate. I will warn the local pig farmers that your inevitable misreading of the Corporation's inspiring slogan may have unfortunate consequences for their livestock.

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

They of the pan-galactic gargle-blaster?

Certainly of that Universe, though that noble beverage is actually the invention of the Galaxy's fugitive president.

However, it may be that many of the SCC's automated products were designed and built by operatives enjoying the consciousness-expanding, though physically debilitating, properties of the aforementioned cocktail. Much is thereby explicable that would otherwise present an incomprehensible mystery.

S&E

 

[Kumar]

There's plenty of logic to be had in further discussion but you won't follow logic and accept the conclusions. You have still not explained how merely a 1 in 10 dilution step causes chemicals to reverse their normal chemical action. You have provided no evidence and no rational argument in support of your position.

Already told. I can not add further, when dark side of the day is preferred. Although it is also a part of a day.

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

Already told. I can not add further, when dark side of the day is preferred. Although it is also a part of a day.

Bollocks.

You still have not made any reasonable attempt to answer the question. Hiding behind rhetorical trickery does not obscure that fact.

There is no reasonable answer to my question because your position is in error and I think you damn well know it or you wouldn't play the same tedious tricks with language that politicians use and which make interviews with them tiresome exercises in futility when they simply will not admit a self-evident fact because to do so would be in conflict with their asserted beliefs

 

[Badly Shaved Monkey]

I also note that as I increase the complexity of my syntax you are able to follow my meaning perfectly well, but refuse to respond in clear English. That just lends weight to the argument that you are a deliberate troller. I have to congratulate you on the length of the game you play, but the nature of that game is transparent.