• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Moleculer Side of Homeopathy?

It is worth noting:

"This part of homeopathy(MT) is quite similar to other systems of Medicine in vogue"

Hence we can link this MT and lowest potency part with the above telling.

Except for one thing: There is no general curative principle (such as like cures like). So every single MT will need to be tested for efficacy.

Hans
 
Evaluation of safety profile of homoeopathic mother tinctures

http://www.ijrh.org/article.asp?iss...lume=8;issue=2;spage=81;epage=86;aulast=Singh



But still I feel some MT and lowest potencies can bring side effects and those may be considered as a crude/high dose not potentized/low dose.




From the acute toxicity results section of the cited paper:

Acute oral toxicity study

Oral LD 50 of mother tinctures in rats was found to be >4ml/kg body weight. Administration of mother tinctures at a dose of 4 ml/kg body weight showed survival of more than 50% of animals in tested groups. Ten percent mortality was found in four groups viz. Rauwolfia serpentina mother tincture, Curcuma longa control, Rauwolfia serpentina control and Ricinus communis mother tinctures [Figure 1]. Thus, results demonstrated that the mother tinctures at a dose of 4 ml/kg can be considered safe in rats.[/QUOTE}

They in no way determined the LD50. The idea that because less than 50% of 10 individuals died means you can conclude the LD50 is greater than the single dosage level of the study suggests the investigators are either incompetent or ignorant. This generously might be considered a toxicity screening study. But to go on and declare the MTs are safe when, for four of the tested substances 1 in 10 test animals died, is ridiculous. The paper says the acute toxicity groups were observed for 14 days after dosing; why is there no mention of when during this time mortality occurred? And no apparent investigation as to the causes of the deaths? Later in the paper there is speculation the deaths may have resulted from acute alcohol poisoning from the solvent used in the tinctures. The investigators show a distinct lack of curiosity about these aspects of their study. I doubt if they evaluated a study of conventional medicine toxicity they would be sanguine about any reported mortality.
 
Prepration of Mother Tincture

https://books.google.co.in/books?id...epage&q=toxicity from mother tincture&f=false

It is worth noting:

"This part of homeopathy(MT) is quite similar to other systems of Medicine in vogue"

Hence we can link this MT and lowest potency part with the above telling.

As MRC Hans said, NO, No you cannot. At least not with any honesty, integrity or desire to help your patient............

Oh possibly you meant MF rather than MT. That would, of course, be more likely!!!
 
Prepration of Mother Tincture

https://books.google.co.in/books?id...epage&q=toxicity from mother tincture&f=false

It is worth noting:

"This part of homeopathy(MT) is quite similar to other systems of Medicine in vogue"

Hence we can link this MT and lowest potency part with the above telling.

Yes, I feel, till sub-molecular effect from higher potencies are fully understood, molecular level should be checked for low-clinical doses. It is not necessary low-clinical doses in homeopathic quantity are always toxic to us.

Try taking a 1c does of Kali Cyanatum and get back to us.

(Hint: DON'T actually do this as it will kill you.)

You are making unfounded claims about homeopathic safety. There is a wide range of homeopathic remedies that will cause harm at low dilutions. Your grotesque ignorance on this very simple, remedial, point is further evidence of your need to learn the basics of homeopathy before you start babbling about it as if you knew what you were talking about.

How can you in good conscience advocate for homeopathy when you clearly know nothing about it?
 
With reference to the thread's title, how does one cule a mole?
How many homeopaths does it take to cule a mole?
 

While that was probably an accurate description of Kumar's knowledge level when she / he first came here, after YEARS of discussion it is inconceivable that she / he would be that totally unaware of just how little they actually know about homeopathy.

I cannot accept that Kumar would STILL be that clueless about their complete lack of understanding about homeopathy, hence my asking the direct question.

Kumar, how can you, in good conscience, continue to advocate for and discuss homeopathy when you clearly know nothing about it?
 
Oh, I thought it was "cull"

And the answer is to wait for it to get ill and then treat it homeopathically
 
So it has had an actual subject all that time :thumbsup: :D

I mean, seriously, check out this game.



:jaw-dropp Yeah, that was my reaction too.

It's all about programming and molecules and chemistry. It's funky fresh with more hardcore science than a homeopath's convention meeting in a Scientology owned conference center and sponsored by an alt-med mega-corp!

(admittedly, that's a low bar to set...)
 
While that was probably an accurate description of Kumar's knowledge level when she / he first came here, after YEARS of discussion it is inconceivable that she / he would be that totally unaware of just how little they actually know about homeopathy.

I cannot accept that Kumar would STILL be that clueless about their complete lack of understanding about homeopathy, hence my asking the direct question.

Kumar, how can you, in good conscience, continue to advocate for and discuss homeopathy when you clearly know nothing about it?

Sorry, You are not capable to judge it.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom