[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

So you believe it crashed into the Pentagon, but from the North side of the Citgo?

You believe the North side and the impact, is that correct?
I have all your witnesses saying your are wrong. In fact most said in 2001, over 5 years ago, they saw 77 hit the Pentagon, and hit the light posts. Done deal. Sorry you can try to tell lies, you can change what they said, but you are still just a liar.

The plane can only hit from south due to the heading the plane was on and confirmed by your witnesses, funny your witnesses make you the worst kind of person. One who twist the facts and makes up stuff. Sad stuff. The headings are correct on the FDR, and those heading and the witnesses prove you wrong, over and over forever. Forever wrong. Learn to live with reality, you are wrong, before you even started.
 
Last edited:
Oh, look, a troofer

I want to start a new name for you guys.

Drumroll please...

"Duhbunkers"

Did you spend a lot of time writing up that little skit? It's like what 1-2 in the morning there. Had a big Worlds of Warcraft night?
 
Given the thorough debunking all of your nonsense received in this thread, I'm quite surprised that you resurrected it Lyte. Or are you in denial?

Actually, it seems that he's just doing whatever he can to try to make his craziness appear as though it's worthy of discussion, and he knows that he couldn't do that by reference to his current posts, so he figured that by digging up some old, long debunked nonsense, he could make it appear to casual viewers that the old thread is current.

I think he hopes that by garnering our responses, nobody will notice after a couple of dozen posts that the thread is old and long debunked, and that it will instead appear as though it is a current and lengthy discussion about his long debunked premises.

Thus, I will not contribute to this thread any further because I do not wish to lend any credence to such twoofer manipulation.

Nice try, though, Lyte.

I hope that skeptics will see through Lyte's pathetic little game and not give him the attention he craves.
 
Last edited:
So you believe it crashed into the Pentagon, but from the North side of the Citgo?

You believe the North side and the impact, is that correct?

The point being of course that even if the plane followed the path you say it did, it still would not have been able to pull-up and fly over the Pentagon without someone noticing.

Nor could all of the damaged light poles etc have been faked without anyone noticing.

You are being very silly by continuing to parade your stupid arguments in public. Feel free to continue though, because you're only making a fool of yourself.
 
Lyte,

You're wrong about chemtrails

You're wrong about the NWO

Why should anyone trust your judgment regarding the Pentagon?
 
So you believe it crashed into the Pentagon, but from the North side of the Citgo?

You believe the North side and the impact, is that correct?

For the sake of getting you to answer my damn question, yes.

Ok, so how did pole 1 spear Lloyd England's cab?

How were the other 4 poles hit?

How come the video shows a plane low and level across the lawn?

And have you read the ASCE report?
 
Lyte,

You're wrong about chemtrails

You're wrong about the NWO

Why should anyone trust your judgment regarding the Pentagon?

"OMGZ.

You're wrong about Santa Claus.

You're wrong about the Easter Bunny.

They are real. Why should I believe you about the North side Lyte?"
 
Ok, so how did pole 1 spear Lloyd England's cab?

How were the other 4 poles hit?

How come the video shows a plane low and level across the lawn?

And have you read the ASCE report?

It was planted.

Operatives with hammers.

Video Fakery

(Do we agree or disagree with the ASCE, let me know and I'll get back to you)

Now.

If you prove that the plane crashed into the Pentagon from over here rather than from over there, what does that accomplish?
 
I have all your witnesses saying your are wrong. In fact most said in 2001, over 5 years ago, they saw 77 hit the Pentagon, and hit the light posts. Done deal. Sorry you can try to tell lies, you can change what they said, but you are still just a liar.

The plane can only hit from south due to the heading the plane was on and confirmed by your witnesses, funny your witnesses make you the worst kind of person. One who twist the facts and makes up stuff. Sad stuff. The headings are correct on the FDR, and those heading and the witnesses prove you wrong, over and over forever. Forever wrong. Learn to live with reality, you are wrong, before you even started.


Oh B[rule8]nut, you know you don't know what you are talking about so don't bother. If you are brave, post a witness and I will show you how you are wrong and have no idea what you are talking about.
 
Repeat

Actually, it seems that he's just doing whatever he can to try to make his craziness appear as though it's worthy of discussion, and he knows that he couldn't do that by reference to his current posts, so he figured that by digging up some old, long debunked nonsense, he could make it appear to casual viewers that the old thread is current.

I think he hopes that by garnering our responses, nobody will notice after a couple of dozen posts that the thread is old and long debunked, and that it will instead appear as though it is a current and lengthy discussion about his long debunked premises.

Thus, I will not contribute to this thread any further because I do not wish to lend any credence to such twoofer manipulation.

Nice try, though, Lyte.

I hope that skeptics will see through Lyte's pathetic little game and not give him the attention he craves.
 
It was planted.

Operatives with hammers.

Video Fakery

(Do we agree or disagree with the ASCE, let me know and I'll get back to you)

Now.

If you prove that the plane crashed into the Pentagon from over here rather than from over there, what does that accomplish?


So you do believe the plane was on the North side? You have seen the witnesses in the PentaCon and you agree with them that it was on the North side?
 
So you do believe the plane was on the North side? You have seen the witnesses in the PentaCon and you agree with them that it was on the North side?

Yes Lyte, as stated earlier, I am your fervent and willing disciple.

Now.

Please master enlighten me, once we prove that the plane crashed into the Pentagon from over hererather than from over there, what have we accomplished?
 
My god. You people live here , don't you?
OMG, I just emptied the trash, had some port, roasted some stuff on the porch, and spent 25 seconds to find a person on the internet telling lies about 9/11 and changing witness statements to make up lies about 9/11.

You are too challenged to find facts and evidence on 9/11, while I listen to SACD and redesign a new speaker system, set up dinner for tomorrow, make plans for a 6,000 mile road trip, and all you can do is defend you lies with false by making up stuff about 9/11. Why are you surprised? Some people can type on their cell phones faster than you can make up lies about 9/11. I expect most people who do not make up lies about 9/11 are able to type, listen to great music, or read a book while you try to make up more stale lies about 9/11.

The funnies of your clips is when you change the drawing, or try to change the guy who confirms the real path of 77. Funny stuff, if not for the fact you are making up lies. Sad, do you use more than two fingers to type? Your lies are still lies forever, and your sad existence to make up lies about 9/11 continues. Some people are not able to research, or use logical thinking. Are you having problems making up more stuff?
 
Actually, it seems that he's just doing whatever he can to try to make his craziness appear as though it's worthy of discussion, and he knows that he couldn't do that by reference to his current posts, so he figured that by digging up some old, long debunked nonsense, he could make it appear to casual viewers that the old thread is current.

I think he hopes that by garnering our responses, nobody will notice after a couple of dozen posts that the thread is old and long debunked, and that it will instead appear as though it is a current and lengthy discussion about his long debunked premises.

Thus, I will not contribute to this thread any further because I do not wish to lend any credence to such twoofer manipulation.

Nice try, though, Lyte.

I hope that skeptics will see through Lyte's pathetic little game and not give him the attention he craves.

I agree and so I am not posting this reply. Oops. Just so it's not a total waste and because we've seen enough Selma, I give you a real classic:
sophia_loren167a.jpg
 
OMG, I just emptied the trash, had some port, roasted some stuff on the porch, and spent 25 seconds to find a person on the internet telling lies about 9/11 and changing witness statements to make up lies about 9/11.

You are too challenged to find facts and evidence on 9/11, while I listen to SACD and redesign a new speaker system, set up dinner for tomorrow, make plans for a 6,000 mile road trip, and all you can do is defend you lies with false by making up stuff about 9/11. Why are you surprised? Some people can type on their cell phones faster than you can make up lies about 9/11. I expect most people who do not make up lies about 9/11 are able to type, listen to great music, or read a book while you try to make up more stale lies about 9/11.

The funnies of your clips is when you change the drawing, or try to change the guy who confirms the real path of 77. Funny stuff, if not for the fact you are making up lies. Sad, do you use more than two fingers to type? Your lies are still lies forever, and your sad existence to make up lies about 9/11 continues. Some people are not able to research, or use logical thinking. Are you having problems making up more stuff?

B----nut, your own forum comrades don't even respond to you.

You are better off feeding pigeons in a park.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom