[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[Regnad Kcin]

...BTW, reported.

For the seventh time:

The screen name you are presently using may be "Skeptic4Sure," but have you ever used the screen name "JohnDoeX" (not to be confused with "John Doe X"), "Killtown" or "Merc?"

 

[Pardalis]

OK, so we have unexplained flying lightpoles and a disappearing tree.

CONSPIRACY!

 

[Gravy]

When was the aerial photo taken, S4S? There's your answer. Or are you suggesting that the gubmint CGI department is putting nonexistent trees on videos and hoping that the Elite Pentagon Research Team won't notice?

Nothing gets past the Elite Pentagon Research Team!

(Except airliners, eyewitness testimony, FAA data, debris, remains, forensics, and the concept of speaking to the first responders and investigators. Other than that, nothing!)

 

[Bell]

OK, so we have unexplained flying lightpoles and a disappearing tree.

CONSPIRACY!

'tis a nice way to sidetrack form the question why there is no plane flying over the Pentagon in the video

 

[aggle-rithm]

Look at what that guy Killtown posted at the LC forums, interesting if proven to be true...

It would be interesting if ANYTHING Killtown has said were proven to be true.

 

[aggle-rithm]

When was the aerial photo taken, S4S? There's your answer. Or are you suggesting that the gubmint CGI department is putting nonexistent trees on videos and hoping that the Elite Pentagon Research Team won't notice?

Nothing gets past the Elite Pentagon Research Team!

(Except airliners, eyewitness testimony, FAA data, debris, remains, forensics, and the concept of speaking to the first responders and investigators. Other than that, nothing!)

"Curses! We never expected Scooby Doo and the gang to be on the case!"

 

[Skeptic4Sure]

When was the aerial photo taken, S4S? There's your answer. Or are you suggesting that the gubmint CGI department is putting nonexistent trees on videos and hoping that the Elite Pentagon Research Team won't notice?

Nothing gets past the Elite Pentagon Research Team!

(Except airliners, eyewitness testimony, FAA data, debris, remains, forensics, and the concept of speaking to the first responders and investigators. Other than that, nothing!)

Mark Roberts,

I didn't make a claim about the tree. Killtown did. I noted his photo and said if it is true, then it would make for an interesting point.

Regardless, I don't see a plane and there is NO PROOF that the flyover is false based on this video.

Funny though, you haven't EFFECTIVELY debated me using "airliners, eyewitness testimony, FAA data, debris, remains, forensics, and the concept of speaking to the first responders and investigators."

Keep that in mind.

 

[Pardalis]

Where's the plane flying over the Pentagon in the video, ma toutoune?

 

[Gravy]

Here's Kate's (debunk911myths) photo taken this year in front of the Doubletree. Sorry, not even a Singletree!

 

[Gravy]

Funny though, you haven't EFFECTIVELY debated me using "airliners, eyewitness testimony, FAA data, debris, remains, forensics, and the concept of speaking to the first responders and investigators."

Keep that in mind.

You mean besides posting the accounts from the people interviewed by the Elite Pentagon Research Team?

 

[Pardalis]

Here's Kate's (debunk911myths) photo taken this year in front of the Doubletree. Sorry, not even a Singletree!

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/imagehosting/879045746950996bc.jpg[/qimg]

There's not even enough space on the sidewalk for a tree to be.

 

[TheGrunion]

Mark Roberts,

Regardless, I don't see a plane and there is NO PROOF that the flyover is false based on this video.

I'm confident that the hypothetical flight path that you'll need to propose to demonstrate that a flyover is even feasible rests in airspace that is clearly visible from the Doubletree camera.

And its not about us proving the flyover as false. It about you guys proving that the flyover is true. Otherwise your flyover theory will be a baseless claim with no evidence supporting it.

 

[332nd]

Regardless, I don't see a plane and there is NO PROOF that the flyover is false based on this video.

What?

 

[Gravy]

There's not even enough space on the sidewalk for a tree to be.

There is, in the planter strip between the sidewalk and the parking lot. There is a tree in the video. It's just a small tree, not a "big-ass" tree. Global warming probably killed it.

This reminds me of an episode of Father Ted in which Ted has to explain to Father Dougal that the cows in the field aren't little cows, they're just far away.

 

[Pardalis]

Maybe the tree was silenced.

 

[Gravy]

Maybe the tree was silenced.

They had to kill it because it grew too much.

 

[Pardalis]

The sick bastards.

 

[Gravy]

I'll bet they hired that famous NWO hitman Crazy Chainsaw.

 

[Mashuna]

This reminds me of an episode of Father Ted in which Ted has to explain to Father Dougal that the cows in the field aren't little cows, they're just far away.

If Father Dougal is involved in the 9/11 CTs in any way, that would explain a LOT.

ETA
I also remember an episode with a diagram trying to explain the difference between imagination and real life. It's all starting to fit together now.

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

...Regardless, I don't see a plane and there is NO PROOF that the flyover is false based on this video.

Argumentum ad ignoratium. Unless the video shows a flyover then then video can not be claimed to support the flyover claim.

Funny though, you haven't EFFECTIVELY debated me using "airliners, eyewitness testimony, FAA data, debris, remains, forensics, and the concept of speaking to the first responders and investigators."

Keep that in mind.

Gravy's use of quotes is in support of physical evidence. You have consistently tried to use quotes to deny physical evidence. That is a major difference; one which both you and Lyte have continued to ignore.