[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[LashL]

So, if I'm reading this thread correctly, some CTer claims that he has evidence that will blow the real life version of the events of 9/11 out of the water, and he's had that evidence for quite some time, but instead of working on presenting this earth shattering evidence to the world and bringing the alleged governmental perpetrators to justice, he's wandering around the internet saying, "Look at me! Look at me!"

I don't even have to be a fake psychic to predict that this poor cretin is going to be severely humiliated in the very near future. It's almost sad how delusions of grandeur can so badly cloud the judgement of the incompetent, the misinformed, and those incapable of rational or critical thought.

(Note: I said "almost sad" - in this particular case, this particular CTer will deserve every bit of the humiliation that will inevitably follow.) Edit to add: that goes for his newly signed-up sidekick, too.

 

[Gravy]

You know because this super evil, ultra secure, total totalitariun government just forgot to shred the docco and put it in a rubbish bin instead....!

You know document shredders don't work. They were supposed to blow up the building with the document in it, but flight 93 didn't make it.

 

[Dog Town]

From the Horses mouth, MCLyte in the loafers @LC said...

Clearly Lloyd is lying or else the laws of physcis were violated.

The pole was much too long and heavy to have left his hood undamaged.

Lloyd has asserted from day one that it was this large pole that hit his cab as opposed to the small piece indicated below.
(Posted Image)


There would be zero reason or motive for Lloyd to lie or exaggerate about what hit his cab therefore the only logical conclusion is that his account has been totally fabricated and staged.

Lloyd has somehow been compromised by the perpetrators.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=78

Beyond kooky!

 

[Lyte Trip]

Gravy,

Nice try but you shot an airball.

Besides attributing a bunch of statements to me that I didn't make.....

Hal Bidlack was not a witness to the plane at all let alone the final trajectory or the light poles being hit.

I interviewed Father McGraw in person. He gave me a medialion of the archangel micheal slaying the serpent/devil.

He adimitted to me on camera that he did not see the light poles hit but only deduced that they were hit after seeing them on the ground.

Mind you he was in the perfect place to see them being hit so if they were hit it would have been directly in his field of vision.

But he didn't.

 

[Gravy]

From the Horses mouth, MCLyte in the loafers @LC said...

Clearly Lloyd is lying or else the laws of physcis were violated

Ah, so father McGraw is also lying.

"I was in the left hand lane with my windows closed. I did not hear anything at all until the plane was just right above our cars."

"The plane clipped the top of a light pole just before it got to us, injuring a taxi driver, whose taxi was just a few feet away from my car." –Father Stephen McGraw

 

[Gravy]

Gravy,

Nice try but you shot an airball.

Besides attributing a bunch of statements to me that I didn't make.....

Hal Bidlack was not a witness to the plane at all let alone the final trajectory or the light poles being hit.

I interviewed Father McGraw in person. He gave me a medialion of the archangel micheal slaying the serpent/devil.

He adimitted to me on camera that he did not see the light poles hit but only deduced that they were hit after seeing them on the ground.

Mind you he was in the perfect place to see them being hit so if they were hit it would have been directly in his field of vision.

But he didn't.

And Father McGraw claims the airliner didn't hit the Pentagon, right, Lyte?

Well? We're all eager to hear your answer.

While you're at it: did flight 77 hit the Pentagon, Lyte?

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Gravy,

Nice try but you shot an airball.

Besides attributing a bunch of statements to me that I didn't make.....

Hal Bidlack was not a witness to the plane at all let alone the final trajectory or the light poles being hit.

I interviewed Father McGraw in person. He gave me a medialion of the archangel micheal slaying the serpent/devil.

He adimitted to me on camera that he did not see the light poles hit but only deduced that they were hit after seeing them on the ground.

Mind you he was in the perfect place to see them being hit so if they were hit it would have been directly in his field of vision.

But he didn't.

Is any of your "evidence" not anecdotal in nature?

 

[Lyte Trip]

From the Horses mouth, MCLyte in the loafers @LC said...



Beyond kooky!

Oh so you want to discuss Lloyd?

I wouldn't reccomend that.

That story doesn't play out too well for you skeptics.

If you were true to your nature you would understand how it's impossible to not be skeptical about what Lloyd claims.

 

[apathoid]

I interviewed Father McGraw in person. He gave me a medialion of the archangel micheal slaying the serpent/devil.

He adimitted to me on camera that he did not see the light poles hit but only deduced that they were hit after seeing them on the ground.

So what you're saying is that the NWO(or whoever) can work miracles? One second the lightpoles are standing there unharmed, the next second they are lying on the ground all busted up without being hit by anything? Maybe someone was playing a variation of mailbox baseball, but with a really big bat..

 

[JFM]

Gravy,

Nice try but you shot an airball.

Besides attributing a bunch of statements to me that I didn't make.....

Hal Bidlack was not a witness to the plane at all let alone the final trajectory or the light poles being hit.

I interviewed Father McGraw in person. He gave me a medialion of the archangel micheal slaying the serpent/devil.

He adimitted to me on camera that he did not see the light poles hit but only deduced that they were hit after seeing them on the ground.

Mind you he was in the perfect place to see them being hit so if they were hit it would have been directly in his field of vision.

But he didn't.

So Lyte. Did you not on the "The Downed Light Poles Were Staged., Therefore a 757 didn't hit the pentagon." thread, page 9, 2 posts up from the bottom claim, "We found the white house document that Bush signed ordering the attacks."?

I think you did.

You also called Mr England, several VERY uncmplimentary things.

 

[Dog Town]

It gets better.
MCLyte in the loafers also said...

Other evidence that the light poles were staged was the fact that they were ignored by the FBI and left lying around for 3 weeks to be photographed only to be unceremoniously cleaned up and salvaged by the VDOT.

Why would the poles need to be evidence? So your smoking gun was left laying around for weeks? Bwahahahahaha! You too funny!

 

[Lyte Trip]

And Father McGraw claims the airliner didn't hit the Pentagon, right, Lyte?

Well? We're all eager to hear your answer.

Sorry but this thread is about the final trajectory of the craft and whether or not it was to the north or south of the citgo station.

Stay on topic please.

Father McGraw makes no claims as to knowing anything about what specific direction or angle the plane approached from.

He also claims he didn't see the light poles hit.

hmmmmmmm.

 

[hellaeon]

Wow this 'movement' gets more handicapped by the day. Why am I reminded of those guys in Penn and Tellers conspiracy episode wearing the sunnies at the alien convention. The truthers amongst the truthers so to speak.
I wish Penn Jillette was a member. Would be subscription worthy entertainment to see him replying to this tripe.

 

[apathoid]

Oh so you want to discuss Lloyd?

I wouldn't reccomend that.

Let us have it - but keep in mind that some of the posters here(not me!) are really, really into physics.

 

[Lyte Trip]

You also called Mr England, several VERY uncmplimentary things.

Really?

What did I call him?

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Sorry but this thread is about the final trajectory of the craft and whether or not it was to the north or south of the citgo station.

Stay on topic please.

Father McGraw makes no claims as to knowing anything about what specific direction or angle the plane approached from.

He also claims he didn't see the light poles hit.

hmmmmmmm.

Let's try a different tact, is any of your "evidence" objective in nature?

 

[Lyte Trip]

Let us have it - but keep in mind that some of the posters here(not me!) are really, really into physics.

Then that will be a good one for here in the future.

But I've been discussing that in the LC forum for a while now so you can feel free to read that if you like.

 

[JFM]

Really?

What did I call him?

You know exactly what you said. Why don't you tell the good folks here what you think of Mr England?

 

[JFM]

BTW Lyte, if you could please scan in that document that makes it so hard for the chimp...

 

[Dog Town]

Last one from MCLyte...

I am suggesting that the plane did not hit the pentagon or the light poles at all.

It was merely a decoy and the damage was staged.

The citgo witnesses are crucial because of their important vantage point of the plane before it allegedly hit the light poles.

Nobody else had as good of a view.

The fact that BOTH of them put the plane to the north of the station speaks volumes and although they would have only seen the plane for a couple seconds........they certainly heard and felt it as well. Mistaking what side of the station it was on would not be easy

Both?