[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?

[Skeptic4Sure]

Everyone knows, what you are being so goofy about. You claim the plane came from another angle. Bah, you got nothen!

Of course, Stupid.

I am referring to the details and ACTUAL PROOF, what it entails.

Not just a thread on a forum, Mini-Mind.

You have received several warnings for incivil behaviour. Do not continue or further action will be taken.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

 

[T.A.M.]

Here is what I acknowledge, S4S:

If (get that "If"), it is proven to me (which means witnesses with signed testimony, FDR data verified independently by a trusted source proving a north side flight path), than what I would acknowledge is that there is evidence that the official story got the flight path wrong for the crash of AA77.

John with red socks versus John with green socks, and nothing more.

TAM

 

[Dog Town]

This is a fact, you will soon learn.

You might wanna look that word up!

 

[Dog Town]

Of course,I'm Stupid.

I am referring to the details and ACTUAL PROOF, what it entails.

Fixed, and you need to look that word up next!

 

[Pardalis]

It just simply is being compiled and will be presented. There could have been more investigation to this. But you're right, it needs to come out. And that is the sentiment all the way around. But presentation is everything. And NO this has nothing to do with Loose Change the final cut.

If it was in any way real evidence, it wouldn't need this kind of "cooking up".

If facts are facts, they can stand on their own.

Show us.

 

[Bell]

Throughout this thread, S4S aka JDX has shown us that he is a coward. Yes sir, A COWARD!!

 

[Pardalis]

FACTS are FACTS Skepti4Sure, they don't need make up.

Show us.

 

[T.A.M.]

I predict what will happen, is the "evidence" will be presented, and if shown to the "people in the know" so to speak (ie aeronautical engineers, pilots, etc...) that it will then be analyzed, but in the end they will find errors in the original analysis by the "presenters", and they will be shown the door.

Dont forget you read it here first.

TAM

 

[gumboot]

There's a whole section devoted to it, with a verbatim transcript, in the WTC 7 paper that's linked in my signature.

Wow I only just read this.

Incredible. Alex Jones may just be the least informed CTer I've ever witnessed.

-Gumboot

 

[Dog Town]

<snip>
And be sure you're accounting for magnetic deviation, the broken light poles, and all the witness accounts.

Got a lotta moolah, on Gravy nailed it all! The "smoking gun" will get shot down, in the time it takes to type a rebuttal.

 

[Bell]

S4S aka JDX enters the stage of a comedyclub:

Sooo... anybody from flight 77 in the audience?

 

[Oliver]

DO

YOU

UNDERSTAND???

No, i don´t. Honestly. Could you sum it up in
a view sentences?

 

[gumboot]

John with red socks versus John with green socks, and nothing more.

And let's just say you're colour blind...

-Gumboot

 

[WildCat]

Because I have an ace up my sleeve.

No, you don't.

You do, however, have your head up your ____ (fill in the blank).

 

[WildCat]

And the mystery of how the conspirators cocked it up so badly that they couldn't get their plane to hit the pre-prepared path to the pentagon.

And yet were able to hit the WTC towers exactly on the floors where the explosives were planted...

 

[Bell]

No, you don't.

You do, however, have your head up your ____ (fill in the blank).

JDX aka S4S aka S4B aka S4Brains

 

[rwguinn]

And yet were able to hit the WTC towers exactly on the floors where the explosives were planted...

Now, after many, many moons of participation, I understand the reason for all the cat pictures that get posted.
Cats, too, love to play with their food...

You (We?) are really, truely, without a doubt....
Naughty


and I love it~!

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Ok, so then there is one thing I want to establish that we all learned as fact in this thread.

If the plane is on the North Side of the gas station, the plane DEFINITELY COULD NOT HAVE hit poles 1, 2, and 3. And it definitely couldn't have hit poles 4 and 5 due to the undamaged poles next to them.

[qimg]http://pentagonresearch.com/images/020.jpg[/qimg]

If the plane is on the North side of the gas station, then the damage as detailed in the ASCE report was actually made by something other than this aircraft, due to the directional damage located in the Pentagon.

Picture orientation is wrong:
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=...253,-77.061356&spn=0.004085,0.007231&t=h&om=1

 

[W6102LA]

Of course, Stupid.

I am referring to the details and ACTUAL PROOF, what it entails.

Not just a thread on a forum, Mini-Mind.

You have received several warnings for incivil behaviour. Do not continue or further action will be taken.

Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

Don't bother presenting your proof, it's been discredited allready

 

[TjW]

Sure nothing wrong with that...


And for the last time, I am not John Doe X.

DO

YOU

UNDERSTAND???

But what if you were? What then? What if you were John Doe X? Huh? Just as a hypothetical? What if you were John Doe X? That'd be a whole different thing, then, wouldn't it?