[Moderated] So What Would You Think If This Were True?
- Thread starter Skeptic4Sure
- Start date
Combined with some supposedly new eyewitness stuff:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=636
Edited to add, this thread makes interesting reading as well:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=78
I vote that Skeptic4Sure is Lyte Trip on the LC forums.
Last edited:
What do you know, our Skeptic4Sure is another impressionable 20 something...
Do these guys have a job?
I wonder how these guys will feel about themselves in ten years when their names will still be associated with this nonesense... unless they remain true believers for the rest of their lives, which would be a pity.
Do these guys have a job?
I wonder how these guys will feel about themselves in ten years when their names will still be associated with this nonesense... unless they remain true believers for the rest of their lives, which would be a pity.
That's a very good thread!
Based on this, I retract my guess of Lyte Trip and submit that his friend That One Dood is Skeptic4Sure
That One Dood @LC said:
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=604&view=findpost&p=9197801
That One Dood @LC said:You are going to be apologizing for this comment.
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=604&view=findpost&p=8904760
And plenty more posts on the smae thread with the same combination of game-playing and arrogance.
S4S is definitely one of the boys who went travelling to Washington DC with Dylan a few months back, so that should limit the list.
You can tell from the way he speaks of the evidence, that he researched it himself, the photo of the guys cab, inside, spoken of with to much closeness, as if he were on the scene.
TAM
You can tell from the way he speaks of the evidence, that he researched it himself, the photo of the guys cab, inside, spoken of with to much closeness, as if he were on the scene.
TAM
ihaunter
Undead Skeptic
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2004
- Messages
- 380
I see that defaultdotxbe asked basically the same question I did in http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68870. So feel free to respond there if you want to interrupt the conversation about tsire and his girlfriend.
Roger_Harris
Scholar
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2005
- Messages
- 114
Lyle: "If something happens to me you know why."
If it's something involving a large butterfly net, then yes, I know why...
In retrospect, you may be right. I think I let my anger get the best of me.
These hardcore 9/11 deniers are really just a bunch of pathetic liars...
Skeptic4Sure
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 459
Oh, ok Lord Logic. So now you're the theorist, telling me how it all went down because you stared at a picture long enough to believe "the seatback is about even with the right rear door lock." It got "hammered". And that's the reason they took that photo. Ah yes, because you know. Because you spoke with them. Because they told you that right? It couldn't just be camera foreshortening or because someone reclined the seat.
His account, dear, is that the pole wrecked the seat/interior. That did not happen and it WILL be proven.
You actually believe the large piece of the pole is what caused that damage? And you're questioning MY competence?
Skeptic4Sure
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 459
Can't I simply be someone who is skeptical of something we should all be skeptical of by now?
Can't I simply be someone who is following the developing information, and who does a bit of researching/investigating themselves?
Why do you people obsess these things?
Does it matter who I am?
Can't I simply be someone who is following the developing information, and who does a bit of researching/investigating themselves?
Why do you people obsess these things?
Does it matter who I am?
Roger_Harris
Scholar
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2005
- Messages
- 114
Well, let's see: Many, many people say the plane flew over the bridge, some poles suddenly appear on the ground, several people say the plane hit the poles, but many others reached that rather logical conclusion without seeing actual contact, and the guy has a hole in his windshield. You're going to "prove" that the plane didn't really fly over the bridge by proving the the seat/interior wasn't "wrecked?"
Good luck.
I think I've figured it out. This leaves no doubt of the Conspiracy.
See, the NWO has its own glass and upholstery shops. But it contracts out other services. The NWO doesn't have a paint shop, since it's too expensive to run these days and cuts into their sock budget... so for those tasks, they contract out to KAOS.
But KAOS has a vested interest in propping up the sham-Pentagon, which as we all know is a front for the drug offensive, a competing concept to the "hot" option being spearheaded by the Dutch arm of the NWO under command of the afore-mentioned Queen Beatrix.
So no way would they go along with it. Thus, in order to avoid paying a heftier repair bill, and possibly alerting their rivals, the decision was made to rig the light pole with a Philadelphia Experiment device, teleporting it into the front seat while leaving the valuable hood and mission-critical paint unscratched.
See? Simple. And no, I am not a disinfo agent. You are. Fnord.
What reason is there for you to be -ahum- skeptical? (read: paranoid)
What ACTUAL PROOF do you have that flight 77 did not hit the pentagon.
How are the Pilots for Twoof doing these days? Figured out how the lightpoles were knocked down yet, if not by flight 77?
For starters, it is not allowed to return with a sock puppet after members are banned.
Skeptic4Sure
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2006
- Messages
- 459
So, anyways...
Back to the discussion at hand.
So if the Citgo witness and the North Side flight path is corroborated by other credible witnesses this would qualify as a smoking gun would it not???
This would explain the anomalous damage and lack of large recognizeable debris we see at the Pentagon that so many people question and many find to be "counter-intuitive" would it not???
Just answer the questions.
Back to the discussion at hand.
So if the Citgo witness and the North Side flight path is corroborated by other credible witnesses this would qualify as a smoking gun would it not???
This would explain the anomalous damage and lack of large recognizeable debris we see at the Pentagon that so many people question and many find to be "counter-intuitive" would it not???
Just answer the questions.