[Moderated]List Of NYC Firefighters Who Think Bombs Brought Down The Towers

[DavidJames]

One of us is a 9/11 hero.
Both of us working for the heroes of 9/11 no one else will speak out for.

That out of the way if you have evidence Mr. Isaac or myself are accusing the NYPD and/or FDNY in complicity in the attacks I ask you to present it now.

Here you go CT boy...

On the morning of September 11, 2005, New York City auxiliary fire lieutenant Paul Isaac, Jr. admitted that 9-11 was an inside job. “I know 9-11 was an inside job, the police know it’s an inside job, and the firemen know it too.”

Paul, the police and firemen knew it was an inside job and are apparently withholding vital evidence from authorities thereby obstructing justice and being complicit in the crime.

Pick your category CT boy

 

[TC329]

On what evidence do you base this fantasy?

We can't find the pancakes you abandoned?

 

[DGM]

One of us is a 9/11 hero.
Both of us working for the heroes of 9/11 no one else will speak out for.

That out of the way if you have evidence Mr. Isaac or myself are accusing the NYPD and/or FDNY in complicity in the attacks I ask you to present it now.

“It’s amazing how many people are afraid to talk for fear of retaliation or losing their jobs,”

They know but are covering it up. That was you saying this, right? That's being complacent I believe.

 

[DC]

On what evidence do you base this fantasy?

Cite your evidence so that it can be reviewed. If your goal is to convince people of your claim, then refusing to cite evidence so that it can be examined and vetted by others is not going to win you converts (hence, the Troof cult's inherent fear of submitting papers to mainstream journals for peer review).

We're not just going to "take your word for it."

Put up the evidence you've gathered demonstrating a controlled demolition destroyed the Towers, or stop making the idiotic, baseless claims about it.

well i never wanted anyone just to take my word

and i also dont hope to convince ppl, i hope that the indications they can find for a controlled demolition in videos and witness reports will convince them that we need a new and independent investigation.

 

[Thunder]

Wow, I didnt know that the FDNY were all trained in how to distinguish between a collapse caused by explosives or a fire+ weakened steel.

I also didnt know that the FDNY scoured the WTC debrees for explosives residue.

If a meteor strikes the Earth, makes a big bang, and creates a mushroom cloud, does that mean it was really a nuclear detonation?

9-11 truthers..are soo useless.

 

[Good Lt]

That out of the way if you have evidence Mr. Isaac or myself are accusing the NYPD and/or FDNY in complicity in the attacks I ask you to present it now.

The problem for you and for your Troofer acolytes is that you aren't clear on exactly what you are saying and never have been.

"Just asking questions" is the same thing as "I'm only using the Socratic method to imply that something else happened on 9-11."

You obviously believe something else happened on 9-11 - something evil, nefarious and dastardly within the US or Israeli or Pakistani government, but you won't come out and say what it is you think this dastardly deed is.

So why aren't you presenting an alternative theory or storyline that can be viewed, critiqued and vetted for accuracy in the same manner you're demanding of the "official conspiracy theory?"

I think I have an idea why, but I'm open to your opinions, too.

Just remember, Troofers, that consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds.

 

[Good Lt]

i hope that the indications they can find for a controlled demolition in videos and witness reports will convince them that we need a new and independent investigation.

What "indications?"

Be more specific.

 

[DC]

Wow, I didnt know that the FDNY were all trained in how to distinguish between a collapse caused by explosives or a fire+ weakened steel.

I also didnt know that the FDNY scoured the WTC debrees for explosives residue.

If a meteor strikes the Earth, makes a big bang, and creates a mushroom cloud, does that mean it was really a nuclear detonation?

9-11 truthers..are soo useless.

you like generalisations?

 

[Thunder]

"new and independent investigation"

...getting really tired of hearing this. its not gonna happen, toothers. get a life.

 

[Thunder]

you like generalisations?

only when they are accurate.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

One of us is a 9/11 hero.
Both of us working for the heroes of 9/11 no one else will speak out for.

That out of the way if you have evidence Mr. Isaac or myself are accusing the NYPD and/or FDNY in complicity in the attacks I ask you to present it now.

But please keep in mind that most of us here are playing pretend NWO, we're adults. Besides, I thought Paul wasn't really a fireman and wasn't really near the towers.

Now do you think that Larry was referring to a controlled demolition when he used the term "pull it"?

 

[Dr Adequate]

LOL....... I'm sure there were bombs just in the hallways around the building. I haven't been able to figure out why people didn't walk into their office that morning saying "Holy ****** Look at the size of that bomb in the corner!!!!! I don't recall that being there yesterday".............

Well, obviously it's because the people who planted the bombs managed to secretly dismantle bits of the building and hide the bombs inside the walls and so on without anyone noticing ... not even the sniffer dogs.

 

[Thunder]

maybe they used...invisible explosives? hidden using a cloaking device?

could the drywall have been made of thermite?

 

[Jonnyclueless]

and i also dont hope to convince ppl, i hope that the indications they can find for a controlled demolition in videos and witness reports will convince them that we need a new and independent investigation.

And if indications ever do show up, maybe people will listen. So far not a single person has been able to present a single piece of evidence that remotely even suggests a controlled demolition.

Acting like an idiot running around shouting "Look at the video, it looks just like a CD" (while the actual experts point out why they look absolutely nothing like a CD) does not count.

 

[Thunder]

all the Toothers have, is the instant reaction of FDNY and NYPD, that the collapse looked like an explosion caused by bombs.

ofcourse it looked like an explosion caused by bombs!! we have been trained by Hollywood to think that way.

but that doesnt make it so. get your head out of the boobtube, Toothers.

 

[DC]

What "indications?"

Be more specific.

those indications that all are "debunked" like collapse speed, "squibs", possible thermite traces, high sulfur levels in WTC steel (FEMA), molten metal and so on. im sure you know them and found a convincing explaination.

 

[Sabrina]

those indications that all are "debunked" like collapse speed, "squibs", possible thermite traces, high sulfur levels in WTC steel (FEMA), molten metal and so on. im sure you know them and found a convincing explaination.

Every single one of those has been explained in depth in this very forum, as well as on www.911myths.com, debunking911.org, and other websites. May I suggest you do some research using the search function and see what you can find before raising these points again? Thank you.

 

[Totovader]

those indications that all are "debunked" like collapse speed, "squibs", possible thermite traces, high sulfur levels in WTC steel (FEMA), molten metal and so on. im sure you know them and found a convincing explaination.

So all the evidence you have of controlled demolitions has already been debunked.

Sounds like a strong case you have there...

 

[DC]

all the Toothers have, is the instant reaction of FDNY and NYPD, that the collapse looked like an explosion caused by bombs.

ofcourse it looked like an explosion caused by bombs!! we have been trained by Hollywood to think that way.

but that doesnt make it so. get your head out of the boobtube, Toothers.

the only thing that looked like hollywood was the huge fireballs, cause thats what they use for theyr explosions in the movies, big huge fireballs.

amd how often have you seen buildings collapse like the towers in movies?

and sometimes they get demo experts like the Loizeaux's to demo stuff, or they go film theyr demos.

 

[Architect]

you claimed non of them belives that bombs brought down the towers. i never claimed they belive that or belive the contrary.
so its actually up to you to backup your claim, you claimed that none of them blives that. so i guess you have interviews with those ppl where they clearly state, they dont belive it, or atleast interviews that reflect theyr belives.

My, someone's grammar and syntax has continued to be remarkably high quality. The spelling remains duff, but that's just an obvious red-herring.

So, Dictator, who's sock puppet are you?