[Moderated]Gravy's witness "summary" does not reflect reality.

[stateofgrace]

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Thanks for your concern.

No problem. On top of what other members have asked you, who exactly did you contact?

What are the authorities doing with the information you have provided and have they indicated that Mr Lloyd will be investigated for his part in the mass murder plot?

Will they be interviewing him? Are there any changes pending? Have they dismissed your evidence or have they launched a new investigation?

So if you would summarise exactly where the investigation by the authorities is and what steps they intend to take in bring Mr Lloyd to justice.

 

[A W Smith]

Lyte can you provide a transcript of the words the authorities uttered to you when you told them you had no witnesses for a flyover nor physical evidence?

 

[celestrin]

Go to the Pentagon parking lots from 6:30 to 7:am and they are like Grand Central Station.

At 9:38 they are completely full of empty cars and it's as quiet as a church.

Just out of curiosity - exactly how many times were you there, Lyte? More than once? Was it a Sunday, Lyte? During the holidays? And most importantly, had any planes crashed into the WTC during the previous couple of hours? Elite researcher such as yourself surely knows that some of the reported witnesses came to the Pentagon excatly because of those crashes in NY.

Your speculation denied. Another attempt at comparing your l33t little research summer camp Washington adventure with the events of 9/11 noted.

However certainly it's possible that somebody saw the plane quickly fly away after the explosion.

Another attempt at baseless speculation noted.

That's why they confiscated the 911 calls and made sure there was a 2nd plane cover story.

Baseless, because Lyte is basing his speculations on these two marvels of further speculation and daydreaming. The allegedly confiscated tapes of unknown content and the allegedly fabricated reports of a second plane.

Why do you dismiss witnesses which were not in a position to see the plane crash itself, because they were diving to the ground to save their lives, yet you base your speculation on some unidentified, hypothetical witnesses who may've had called 911 and may've had reported a plane crash near the 14th Bridge? Double standards noted, Lyte.

You do know that a plane had previously crashed at the 14th Bridge, right? Why wouldn't some potencial hypothetical 911 caller, who wasn't in a position to see the Pentagon itself, use it as a reference point?

We have proven the plane flew on the north side of the citgo.

Only in your world, Lyte. In real world you wouldn't know "proof", if your name was Jim Bean and you came in a Jack Daniels bottle. In real world poeple don't get called liars, just because they don't remember every detail of introductary 3-5 seconds to one of the worst days of their lives. It's just you, once again tryng to force your interpretation onto people who were there that day. In real world, there is a body of pyhisical evidence to consider. Where is your proof that this evidence was faked or planted? Does it go beyond a see-saw drawing?

In any case, please, do tell which institutions or even individuals have you contacted with your "proof"? At least tell me who are you pressing charges against. The FBI? Mr. England? Every other eyewitness you don't like? Russell? When are the proceedings to start? When are you releasing the Research Ed?

Or could it be that you are just lying, Lyte? Baiting and trolling, while fishing for counter arguments to your little theory, so you'd know what to include in ReEd and what to drop. You've been presented with some counter arguments and now you've got some more witnesses to dig up dirt on, so, get to work and release your flick already. I promise I'll watch it if it's free.

Since virtually EVERY single witness account could support EITHER flight path

Wrong, Lyte, and I'm not talking about your smoking gun witnesses.

 

[pomeroo]

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Thanks for your concern.

No, Lyte. You are lying about contacting authorities.

You have contacted no real news outlets and no Democratic politicians who strongly oppose Bush's policies.

You have no intention of doing so.

There are no--ZERO--witnesses to your imaginary flyover.

The physical evidence, aircraft wreckage and human remains, refute the absurd myths you promote.

Your fantasy has been exposed as a silly fraud.

 

[Lyte Trip]

It's so funny the way you guys try to shift the focus of this thread to me.

I don't care if you don't believe me about contacting the authorities.

There are no names or hollow accusations that you can make about me that hasn't been done before in this forum.

This thread is about the fact that Mark Roberts has been called out on inaccurate information that his is unwilling to correct or support with evidence.

This has been already proven thanks to TAM in this thread.

 

[stateofgrace]

It's so funny the way you guys try to shift the focus of this thread to me.

I don't care if you don't believe me about contacting the authorities.

There are no names or hollow accusations that you can make about me that hasn't been done before in this forum.

This thread is about the fact that Mark Roberts has been called out on inaccurate information that his is unwilling to correct or support with evidence.

This has been already proven thanks to TAM in this thread.

Eh no, you shifted the focus onto to yourself when you said this.

Wow over 9000 threads Gravy? You've been here since when? Wow. Amazing.

Anyways, I like you had to change my name to "911 victim hater". Can I change yours to "911 Perpetrator Protector" or how about "Main Mole for Mass Murderers"?

So back to that witness. I don't know of any witnesses that saw Lloyd spin out sideways with a pole sticking out of his windshield.

Lloyd is certainly not a witness. Lloyd is the suspect. But hey, what do we even need alibis or corroboration for right? According to Bolo and Gravy, all one need do is say it happened and it is so.

So Gravy, are you ever going to interview the witnesses we did, so we can get this cleared up? Are you going to move it to the next level and call them liars?

You kept the attention upon yourself when you were asked if you had informed the authorities, to which you replied.

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Thanks for your concern.

The attention is now firmly on your claim that Mr Lloyd is a suspect and you have contacted the authorities. As such, since you shifted this attention towards yourself you will not be allowed to sleaze out of it by not backing your claims up.

So what authorities have you informed? What are they doing with all the evidence you said you have provided them?

You made the claim, not I, not anybody else, please answer the question or be man enough to admit you are a liar.

 

[Belz...]

It's so funny the way you guys try to shift the focus of this thread to me.

Well the focus can't be on your claims, since they are not grounded in reality.

So, Lyte. When can we expect all your evidence to be brought to court ?

 

[Lyte Trip]

No matter how hard you try to derail it and regardless of the fact that I may have bitten a couple times this thread is about the now proven fact that Mark Roberts is deliberately and knowingly spreading incorrect information.

Yet none of you seem to care.

We have barely covered the witness list and TAM has already full demonstrated that Mark Roberts' claim is false.

But you are more interested in personally attacking me based on no evidence.

Strange behavior for alleged critical thinkers.

I would think that accurate information would be important to you.

 

[uruk]

I've been away for awhile. Has there been anybody at all who have come forth and claimed they saw the airplane fly past the fireball?

Or has the government "quieted them all".
So they've confiscated 911 calls. What about tracking all those people who could have seen the plane? I mean the government knows where all the illegal aliens are right? They know where Bin Laden is right?

 

[beachnut]

No matter how hard you try to derail it and regardless of the fact that I may have bitten a couple times this thread is about the now proven fact that Mark Roberts is deliberately and knowingly spreading incorrect information.

Yet none of you seem to care.

We have barely covered the witness list and TAM has already full demonstrated that Mark Roberts' claim is false.

But you are more interested in personally attacking me based on no evidence.

Strange behavior for alleged critical thinkers.

I would think that accurate information would be important to you.

Now your post are lies too. You fail to keep your misinformation confined to the Pentagon with your Pentacon junk. You make up a flight path about flight 77 that is has an impossible turn. You change the witnesses testimony and it is seen on your video making lines on photos that are not what the witness said. Your big witnesses in 2001 said that flight 77 hit the light posts and the Pentagon. CIT has made up lies about 9/11 without evidence. Even the trail of DNA makes your path wrong and proves flight 77 hit the Pentagon, yet you still persist in telling lies about 9/11.

 

[pomeroo]

No matter how hard you try to derail it and regardless of the fact that I may have bitten a couple times this thread is about the now proven fact that Mark Roberts is deliberately and knowingly spreading incorrect information.

No, you are lying. Mark Roberts has disseminated accurate information. You have been caught spreading falsehoods many times.

Yet none of you seem to care.

We have barely covered the witness list and TAM has already full demonstrated that Mark Roberts' claim is false.

Nothing of the sort has happened.

But you are more interested in personally attacking me based on no evidence.

Strange behavior for alleged critical thinkers.

I would think that accurate information would be important to you.

You have boasted of having "evidence' that would expose the most monstrous crime in American history. Your "evidence" turned out to be bogus. Not a single person witnessed your imaginary flyover of the Pentagon.

You claimed to have contacted authorities with your phony "evidence." Clearly, you have not contacted anyone, and, as you indicated in a rambling post that equated Bush insiders with people who despise Bush and oppose all of his policies, you have no intention of doing so. You understand that you have produced absolutely nothing to support your fantasies.


Critical thinkers here have concluded that you are a transparent fraud.

 

[Belz...]

So, Lyte. When can we expect all your evidence to be brought to court ?

PS: Hi, Uruk. Long time.

 

[DavidJames]

So, Lyte. When can we expect all your evidence to be brought to court ?

The last place Lyte want’s his “evidence” is in court where it will be exposed as the ludicrous fraud it is. That’s why he never sent it to any authorities.

Of course, he could prove me wrong by announcing who he sent it to. But he won’t. Why not expose those NWO associated authorities for the complicit criminals they are by showing to JREF and the world their failure to act on such compelling evidence. Doing so would bolster his case.

But he won’t.

 

[stateofgrace]

No matter how hard you try to derail it and regardless of the fact that I may have bitten a couple times this thread is about the now proven fact that Mark Roberts is deliberately and knowingly spreading incorrect information.

Yet none of you seem to care.

We have barely covered the witness list and TAM has already full demonstrated that Mark Roberts' claim is false.

But you are more interested in personally attacking me based on no evidence.

Strange behavior for alleged critical thinkers.

I would think that accurate information would be important to you.

Yes it is hence the reason for the questions.This is not an attack on you nor is it not critical thinking. You derailed this thread with this statement.

Lloyd is certainly not a witness. Lloyd is the suspect

YOU then followed it by claiming you had informed the authorities.

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Anybody who applies critical thinking to this would naturally ask which authorities.

So for about the fourth time of asking, which authorities have you passed this information onto and what are they doing with it?

I will if need be start a separate thread on this claim, but you have had enough attention lavished upon you. This thread is moderated and there have been no personnel attacks upon you. I and others have simply asked to back you claims up. You, if you are not lying you will have no problem answering my questions, so why avoid them?

 

[Pardalis]

Lloyd is certainly not a witness. Lloyd is the suspect.

So shall I contact Lloyd England to tell him that Craig Ranke is accusing him of complicity in mass murder?

Do you know what defamation of character means?

 

[Pardalis]

http://www.thepentacon.com/Topic2.htm

Lloyd is not to blame for an operation of this size and magnitude but he is more definitely a direct link to the perpetrators and is the first known accomplice to this horrible crime willing or not.

(underlining theirs)

So Craig Ranke, are you prepared to face the gravity of your accusations?