[Moderated]Gravy's witness "summary" does not reflect reality.

[Lyte Trip]

I wonder if Craig Ranke will ever guess which witness directly refutes his claim. I wonder.

Wow over 9000 threads Gravy? You've been here since when? Wow. Amazing.

Anyways, I like you had to change my name to "911 victim hater". Can I change yours to "911 Perpetrator Protector" or how about "Main Mole for Mass Murderers"?

So back to that witness. I don't know of any witnesses that saw Lloyd spin out sideways with a pole sticking out of his windshield.

Lloyd is certainly not a witness. Lloyd is the suspect. But hey, what do we even need alibis or corroboration for right? According to Bolo and Gravy, all one need do is say it happened and it is so.

So Gravy, are you ever going to interview the witnesses we did, so we can get this cleared up? Are you going to move it to the next level and call them liars?

 

[Lyte Trip]

I wonder if Craig Ranke will ever guess which witness directly refutes his claim. I wonder.

Glad you finally realize that's what it comes down to Mark Roberts!

Since virtually EVERY single witness account could support EITHER flight path it simply comes down to whether or not you choose to believe Lloyd's beyond implausible account that absolutely NOBODY claims to have witnessed or the independently confirmed accounts of the citgo witnesses that is not directly contradicted by anyone.

We have interviewed all of them in person on camera so we have the necessary data for everyone to decide for themselves which story they believe to be more credible.

But bottom line....everyone MUST decide because it is impossible for Lloyd to be simultaneously correct along with Edward, Robert, Chad, & Bill.

Why do you choose Lloyd while dismissing all the other witnesses more credible witnesses?

Why do you choose Lloyd when nobody claims they saw the pole spear his windshield?

How is that possible Mark Roberts?

Why do you deceptively publish information that has been proven to be incorrect by your own colleagues?

Why do you refuse to back up your unsupported and completely inaccurate claim Mark Roberts?

 

[JimBenArm]

Wow over 9000 threads Gravy? You've been here since when? Wow. Amazing.

Anyways, I like you had to change my name to "911 victim hater". Can I change yours to "911 Perpetrator Protector" or how about "Main Mole for Mass Murderers"?

So back to that witness. I don't know of any witnesses that saw Lloyd spin out sideways with a pole sticking out of his windshield.

Lloyd is certainly not a witness. Lloyd is the suspect. But hey, what do we even need alibis or corroboration for right? According to Bolo and Gravy, all one need do is say it happened and it is so.

So Gravy, are you ever going to interview the witnesses we did, so we can get this cleared up? Are you going to move it to the next level and call them liars?

You ever going to list who you presented this evidence of yours to in the law-enforcement community that didn't laugh at you? That would be far more interesting.

 

[Belz...]

Lyte...

Witnesses seeing the plane impact the Pentagon are no good, but witnesses seeing something that you think supports a 'flyover' is ?

 

[Lyte Trip]

Lyte...

Witnesses seeing the plane impact the Pentagon are no good, but witnesses seeing something that you think supports a 'flyover' is ?

I've never said such a thing or implied it.

The citgo witnesses themselves even believe they saw the plane hit the building but their placement of the plane 100% proves how this was a military sleight of hand deception timed to fool most people but backed up with a 2nd plane cover story for others.

Gravy inaccurately has claimed that there are over 100 witnesses who claim they "saw" the plane impact the building.

TAM has successfully demonstrated how many in that list wouldn't have been able to physically see the impact and clearly deduced or assumed it after seeing the plane and hearing the explosion.

Gravy even lists people that were not a witness to the event at all.

His claim is inaccurate and he refuses to correct it or back it up with evidence.

 

[twinstead]

Lyte since when is Lloyd a suspect? Are you saying that anybody who contradicts your theory is suspected to have lied?

You might as go to the next level and start 'taking' out the witnesses whose testimony doesn't support your story. And, speaking of that, why aren't your witnesses having sudden 'accidents' if they are such a threat to the official story?

I mean an organization that would stoop to killing thousands of innocents, planting evidence, and paying off witnesses would certainly stoop to that.

Have you warned your witnesses that they are in grave danger?

Heck, you haven't even told your witnesses that you are using their words to try to prove that their government perpetrated 911, have you?

 

[HyJinX]

But bottom line....everyone MUST decide because it is impossible for Lloyd to be simultaneously correct along with Edward, Robert, Chad, & Bill.

Ok...I'll decide. I believe Lloyd and I don't believe Edwards, Robert, Chad or Bill.

Gosh, that was easy.

 

[Arus808]

Lyte you have shown no physical evidence for a flyover or north of citgo flight path. You have shown not a single Flyover witness even though there is a huge parking lot behind the pentagon for potential flyover witnesses.

Lyte your fantasy is done You have proven nothing.

.

You forgot the other two parking lots. One fronting the pentagon where the flyover would have gone over and the side parking lot where the flyover would have gone through

 

[stateofgrace]

Wow over 9000 threads Gravy? You've been here since when? Wow. Amazing.

Anyways, I like you had to change my name to "911 victim hater". Can I change yours to "911 Perpetrator Protector" or how about "Main Mole for Mass Murderers"?

So back to that witness. I don't know of any witnesses that saw Lloyd spin out sideways with a pole sticking out of his windshield.

Lloyd is certainly not a witness. Lloyd is the suspect. But hey, what do we even need alibis or corroboration for right? According to Bolo and Gravy, all one need do is say it happened and it is so.

So Gravy, are you ever going to interview the witnesses we did, so we can get this cleared up? Are you going to move it to the next level and call them liars?

So you will be reporting Mr Lloyd to the authorities will you? You will be handing over all your evidence to the authorities will you?

You have accused Mr Lloyd of being a suspect in a mass murder plot, so why are you with holding your evidence?

Please contact the authorities immediately and tell them YOU suspect Mr Lloyd of being involved mass murder.

 

[Lyte Trip]

Ok...I'll decide. I believe Lloyd and I don't believe Edwards, Robert, Chad or Bill.

Gosh, that was easy.

You should be given credit for acknowledging the fact that you are willing to abandon all logic and scientific reasoning in order to support the official conspiracy theory.

Kudos to you!

 

[Lyte Trip]

So you will be reporting Mr Lloyd to the authorities will you? You will be handing over all your evidence to the authorities will you?

You have accused Mr Lloyd of being a suspect in a mass murder plot, so why are you with holding your evidence?

Please contact the authorities immediately and tell them YOU suspect Mr Lloyd of being involved mass murder.

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Thanks for your concern.

 

[JimBenArm]

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Thanks for your concern.

Please, tell me who you contacted. And exactly who among them did not laugh at you.

I want to get statements from them of exactly what they thought of your evidence.

You don't have anything to hide here, do you?

 

[bje]

You should be given credit for acknowledging the fact that you are willing to abandon all logic and scientific reasoning in order to support the official conspiracy theory.

Tell us, Lyte Trip, just exactly why you believe that hundreds of eyewitnesses do not exist, and what kind of logic and scientific reasoning you used to arrive at that conclusion.

 

[beachnut]

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Thanks for your concern.

Does this mean the world knows and we have the bad guys? Lyte you are delusional or just trying to sell lies to fools. Pentacon is just making up stuff about 9/11. Pentacon makes up lies about the Pentagon on 9/11 when flight 77 was seen hitting and killing people at the Pentagon. I think you are making fun of those soldiers who dies in the Pentagon and the passengers on flight 77. I hope your 15 dollar video of lies is worth it for you. I guess as a professional liar, you are happy it may pay off. At least you can be happy, there are a bunch of you professional liar about 9/11, trying to profit from 9/11 lies. You have company.

Which police have you talked to, and what are they doing to catch the bad guys who planted all the stuff? Oh, you have no proof? Oh, no one saw anything? Too bad. Back to making up lies, Lyte?

 

[twinstead]

You should be given credit for acknowledging the fact that you are willing to abandon all logic and scientific reasoning in order to support the official conspiracy theory.

Hey, if it's good enough for you it's good enough for us!

 

[HyJinX]

You should be given credit for acknowledging the fact that you are willing to abandon all logic and scientific reasoning in order to support the official conspiracy theory.

Kudos to you!

What's logical and scientific about your ridiculous theory?

 

[Belz...]

Witnesses seeing the plane impact the Pentagon are no good, but witnesses seeing something that you think supports a 'flyover' is ?

I've never said such a thing or implied it.

The citgo witnesses themselves even believe they saw the plane hit the building but their placement of the plane 100% proves how this was a military sleight of hand deception timed to fool most people but backed up with a 2nd plane cover story for others.

Gravy inaccurately has claimed that there are over 100 witnesses who claim they "saw" the plane impact the building.

TAM has successfully demonstrated how many in that list wouldn't have been able to physically see the impact and clearly deduced or assumed it after seeing the plane and hearing the explosion.

Gravy even lists people that were not a witness to the event at all.

His claim is inaccurate and he refuses to correct it or back it up with evidence.

I'll take that as a "yes".


So, basically, the fact that they think they saw the plane hit is a "belief", but the fact that they think they saw the plane to the north is "100% proof" ?

And how did that 757 get away without anybody in the other side of the Pentagon noticing ??

 

[twinstead]

The citgo witnesses themselves even believe they saw the plane hit the building but their placement of the plane 100% proves how this was a military sleight of hand deception timed to fool most people but backed up with a 2nd plane cover story for others.

Lyte I'm sorry but this is where your theory just gets totally ludicrous.

 

[Alt+F4]

We most certainly have done exactly this.

And we will continue to put pressure on them until something is done.

Thanks for your concern.

Lyte, in the interest of truth, how many family members of American Airlines Flight 77 victims have you contacted to inform them that their loved one wasn't murdered on September 11, 2001?

 

[1337m4n]

I've never said such a thing or implied it.

The citgo witnesses themselves even believe they saw the plane hit the building but their placement of the plane 100% proves how this was a military sleight of hand deception timed to fool most people but backed up with a 2nd plane cover story for others.

Serious questions, Lyte:

1) Did you ask any of your witnesses whether they think they could have been mistaken as to whether the plane hit the building?

2) Did you ask any of your witnesses how high the plane was at the moment it hit?

3) Did you ask any of your witnesses whether they saw the collision BEFORE the explosion, or vice versa?