• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

MLM

The $1.40 was a likely *maximum* for any individual CD, not the rate for all CDs, some of which the margin may be $0.00 after payouts to downline.

Read my post above.

1. My rebate numbers of 100% accurate. The balance is operating expenses (and profit)for the supplying company.

And who gets the profits that you've admitted to here? And how are those profits distributed?

2. No, we haven't discussed functions. A Diamond will typically net $0 to $10 on a weekend seminar ticket after payouts to downline Emeralds. They may make as much as $20 on personal group tickets.

And how much profit does N21 make from a function? And how is that distributed?

You have your head stuck in the sand. Jim Dornan has done a beautiful job here of trying to give tools profits some legitimacy. For non idiots though it's obvious what's happening.
 
Whoop-de-doo. Forming a corporation is very simple.

300+ staff with offices in 20+ countries is not.

Here's the real question. Who owns this corp and where do it's profits go?

Jim & Nancy Dornan, wherever they want them to go.

If any of the upline have ownership in this corporation then your tool rebate schedule is just random paper as you have no idea how the profits from the tools are actually shared.

What they do with their profits is an entirely separate question to what money platinums and above earn from selling tools.

Given that this organization IS owned by the people at the top of the pyramid your entire screed here is nonsense.

That sentence was nonsense. The top of what pyramid? In my Oz business the Dornans are nowhere in my upline. In the UK, where N21 spent more than $250K in legal fees during the BERR case, Dornan has no Amway business to speak of.

N21 services many many groups that are not in the Dornan's Amway business, and even more that are actually in their downline but so far in depth they may as well not be and they earn pretty much nothing from Amway from them.

Why the heck shouldn't they be allowed to profit by selling products and services to people who want them? Do you have the same problem with Tony Robbins or Amazon.com for that matter? Are they evil horrible companies for selling stuff to Amway IBOs and profiting from it? :eek:

They control the distribution of profits (they being which upline own the corp). Maybe all of the money goes into Jim Dornan's pocket? More likely he pays out bonuses to his big diamonds, the ones who have enough leverage to demand a large portion of the profits from their organization.

Nope. Most of the profits actually goes back in to the company. Over the last two decades it's primarily been funding international expansion. Each new country opened has required approximately a million bucks investment by N21. Lately that's slowed down and prices are dropping and value increasing, along with increased investment in technologies.

It's actually a beautiful system because it hides most of the tools profit yet still gives a veneer of legitamacy for people like yourself to cling to. These guys aren't dumb.

Veneer of legitimacy? Let's see - guy forms company to sell products and services. He sells products and services and makes a profit. He gives volume discounts to people who buy lots of his companies products and services. They can resell them also for a profit.

Oh yeah, that sounds like nothing but a little veneer ..... :rolleyes:

You are creating two seperate issues when there is only one. The profits are being obfuscated.

No, you are are trying to conflate two separate issues. There is profit for the BSM company, and there is profit for the people who buy and resell BSM products and services. I'm more than aware that in your little tiny part of the Amway world they were often the same, so it's understandable you're confused.

*chortle*. You are seriously deluded. I'm in the media business and our products are released all over the world in many languages including chinese, korean, efigs, russian etc. There are plenty of places to outsource translations and they are fairly inexpensive. Do they do full translation of all audio recordings? Or just subtitles?

Both and neither, depends on the market and product. But please, tell me how much it costs to have a CD recording edited, checked for compliance with Amway's byzantine rules, selected for sale, translated if necessary, packaged and marketed, and not of course forgetting unsold stock and all the recordings that go through this process and then are not used at all (the majority)

Bottom line, I know the media business and it's a very cheap business to run.

Relatively, yes, I agee, but it's just one aspect of a BSM company. Other areas are not so profitable. For example globally N21 often runs "open" meetings at a loss.

Yay. Incidentally how many people attended and what was the cost?

Didn't count, and significantly cheaper (and better) than comparable seminars from third party sources.

I don't disbelieve that you believe this but I think you're just putting up a mental block. Who gets the profit from the N21 tools business? Obfuscation is a beautiful thing isn't it?

Platinums and above share in volume rebates, just like Amway, and the owners of N21, the Dornans, decide what to do with any other profits.

Gimme a break. Seriously. Do you think we were all born yesterday? N21 has got to be making money hand over first. If you don't believe that the wealth is being spread amongst the kingpins of N21 you are simply living in la-la land.

No, you're living in la-la land. I know how the company operates. I'm friends with one of the executives who runs it (an employee). I also know what platinums and above get out of it.

You've shown zero in the way of verifiable information.

Which is just as much as as you've shown, but at least I've given actual real data, you've pretty much just ranted and raved.

Again, where does the money go from all of these sales? A rebate schedule that only pays out a portion of the money doesn't answer the question of where *all* of the money goes.

Much of it goes in expenses, some of it goes in investment, some of it goes to the owners - just like any other business.

Using N21 as a catch-all and claiming they have expenses high enough to eat all of the money is a disgusting lie.

What's a disgusting lie is to say I ever claimed that. I never did, never even implied it.

So please, do fill is in on who own N21 and where any of it's profits go. Of course you aren't actually discussing any of this in good faith so you won't answer this question with anything by BS and spin.

Oh look, already answered it, and way before I even read this. :rolleyes:

You are just as bad as the kingpins and I hope someday you can escape this cult and apologize to all of the people who have screwed up their lives being involved with this dangerous business cult.

blah blah blah blah blah.

Seriously, chill out. Get help. See a shrink or something. You're waaayyyyy to hung up on nothing much. A company sells stuff. people buy stuff. Someone makes a profit. Whoopeedoodah. Heck, even Scheibeler has had an epiphany and decided to get one with his life.
 
300+ staff with offices in 20+ countries is not.



Jim & Nancy Dornan, wherever they want them to go.

E.g. you have no idea.

What they do with their profits is an entirely separate question to what money platinums and above earn from selling tools.

No it's not. If they are pulling out millions in profit for support materials from MY organization then I should be getting a proportionate cut.

That sentence was nonsense. The top of what pyramid? In my Oz business the Dornans are nowhere in my upline. In the UK, where N21 spent more than $250K in legal fees during the BERR case, Dornan has no Amway business to speak of.

Obfuscation. There are several pyramid at work, the amway sponsorship pyramid and the tools pyramid. The Dornans are at the top of the tools pyramid.

N21 services many many groups that are not in the Dornan's Amway business, and even more that are actually in their downline but so far in depth they may as well not be and they earn pretty much nothing from Amway from them.

In other words they service other pyramids. In this case I'm sure that whoever is at the top of that pyramid is getting a bigger cut than your reported volume rebate. Any good business person would negoatiate a bigger cut because they can always change BSM suppliers.

Why the heck shouldn't they be allowed to profit by selling products and services to people who want them? Do you have the same problem with Tony Robbins or Amazon.com for that matter? Are they evil horrible companies for selling stuff to Amway IBOs and profiting from it? :eek:

I didn't say they shouldn't able to profit. I just said it's a scam and there is no disclosure on where the profits go.

Nope. Most of the profits actually goes back in to the company. Over the last two decades it's primarily been funding international expansion. Each new country opened has required approximately a million bucks investment by N21. Lately that's slowed down and prices are dropping and value increasing, along with increased investment in technologies.

This isn't public info and you have no way to support this. $1m for this company is pitifully small amount of money based on some back of the envelope from their website.

Veneer of legitimacy? Let's see - guy forms company to sell products and services. He sells products and services and makes a profit. He gives volume discounts to people who buy lots of his companies products and services. They can resell them also for a profit.

Look at it from the standpoint of a platinum. His organization is being strip mined of money. Look at it from the standpoint of someone starting out where they spend more money on tools and functions than they can afford.


Oh yeah, that sounds like nothing but a little veneer ..... :rolleyes:

It's exactly a veneer. They are using classic money obfuscation techniques (It's not me making all the tools money, it's this company!!!). Gimme a break.

No, you are are trying to conflate two separate issues. There is profit for the BSM company, and there is profit for the people who buy and resell BSM products and services. I'm more than aware that in your little tiny part of the Amway world they were often the same, so it's understandable you're confused.

If you are buying these BSM's from your upline then it's one issue. Going to amazon.com and buying a random Tony Robbins book is a different kettle of fish.

Both and neither, depends on the market and product. But please, tell me how much it costs to have a CD recording edited, checked for compliance with Amway's byzantine rules, selected for sale, translated if necessary, packaged and marketed, and not of course forgetting unsold stock and all the recordings that go through this process and then are not used at all (the majority)

Packaging and manufacturing is super cheap (well under $1 per disc). Editing should be no more than $1000. Translation it depends on what you are doing. Marketing? Don't make me laugh.

Relatively, yes, I agee, but it's just one aspect of a BSM company. Other areas are not so profitable. For example globally N21 often runs "open" meetings at a loss.

Even if I believed this it's not relevant.

Didn't count, and significantly cheaper (and better) than comparable seminars from third party sources.

This is like saying catholics should read the watchtower or something. These materials are religious in nature and not transferable.


Platinums and above share in volume rebates, just like Amway, and the owners of N21, the Dornans, decide what to do with any other profits.

So you're ok with this? So if I'm a diamond I can start a company, sell products into the pyramid, profit and then claim it's the company not me so it's ok? This is just a form of obfuscation.

No, you're living in la-la land. I know how the company operates. I'm friends with one of the executives who runs it (an employee). I also know what platinums and above get out of it.

Then get some real information like what their yearly sales were and how much they are paying out in profits. Keep in mind that I wouldn't expect the corp to show a profit if they pay out all of their profits as bonuses like my company does.

Which is just as much as as you've shown, but at least I've given actual real data, you've pretty much just ranted and raved.

What real data?

Much of it goes in expenses, some of it goes in investment, some of it goes to the owners - just like any other business.

You can't see how plain wrong this is?

What's a disgusting lie is to say I ever claimed that. I never did, never even implied it.

Whatever.

Seriously, chill out. Get help. See a shrink or something. You're waaayyyyy to hung up on nothing much. A company sells stuff. people buy stuff. Someone makes a profit. Whoopeedoodah. Heck, even Scheibeler has had an epiphany and decided to get one with his life.

Comparing me to scheibeler is funny. I'm arguing with you on a skeptic board, not trying to convince the world to buy my book about amway.

Honestly the only reason I bother is that most people on this board aren't in a position to understand what's actually happening here. I have to hand it to the guys that run N21, they've got a genius system going where they can pretend to have a legit business. Heck I almost believe they might believe that themselves.
 
No it's not. If they are pulling out millions in profit for support materials from MY organization then I should be getting a proportionate cut.

Why? I get some books for my group from sources other than N21. I have zero idea where their profits go either, nor do I particular care.

I didn't say they shouldn't able to profit. I just said it's a scam and there is no disclosure on where the profits go.

There's no disclosure on where Amway's profits go either. Nor is there for stuff I buy via Amazon.com for my group.

This isn't public info and you have no way to support this. $1m for this company is pitifully small amount of money based on some back of the envelope from their website.

And yet you've provided exactly ZERO data to support your claims. :cool:

Look at it from the standpoint of a platinum. His organization is being strip mined of money. Look at it from the standpoint of someone starting out where they spend more money on tools and functions than they can afford.

The first claim I dispute, the latter is clearly business idiocy. I've had folk go out and, against my counsel, buy laptops they can't afford because they wanted to show the plan on a laptop. That makes DELL a bad company?

It's exactly a veneer. They are using classic money obfuscation techniques (It's not me making all the tools money, it's this company!!!). Gimme a break.

Ahh yes, so when I make a minor profit (or loss) reselling stuff to my group I bought from amazon.com, I'm really obfuscating by not including amazon.com's profit in the equation! :rolleyes:

If you are buying these BSM's from your upline then it's one issue. Going to amazon.com and buying a random Tony Robbins book is a different kettle of fish.

(1) Why?
(2) I buy the stuff from N21, though in a manner similar to the Amway business it can be considered "via my upline", who buys it from N21.

Packaging and manufacturing is super cheap (well under $1 per disc).

From my info, editing, mastering and packaging actually works out about a buck/cd.

Even if I believed this it's not relevant.

Oh right. Only income matters, expenses don't. :rolleyes:

This is like saying catholics should read the watchtower or something. These materials are religious in nature and not transferable.

I'm talking about generic seminars for network marketing businesses. You claim that's not transferrable to an Amway business? And that latter claim is generally rubbish anyway. For the last decade I haven't been building an Amway business but I've often attended seminars and purchased materials *precisely* because I've found the info/training/inspiration *is* transferable to other businesses. Many others have said the same, including well known financial advisors.

So you're ok with this? So if I'm a diamond I can start a company, sell products into the pyramid, profit and then claim it's the company not me so it's ok? This is just a form of obfuscation.

Your claim isn't about one diamond making profits, it's about ALL diamonds. N21 is owned by one Diamond, it's provides products and services to several hundred Diamonds.

What real data?

Let's see, average payouts and rebate schedules to name two.

You can't see how plain wrong this is?

Nope, I don't believe it's wrong for a company to make a profit, in fact I think it's right as it generates incentives. And that's from someone who'd be a registered Democrat if I was an American. :cool:

Honestly the only reason I bother is that most people on this board aren't in a position to understand what's actually happening here. I have to hand it to the guys that run N21, they've got a genius system going where they can pretend to have a legit business. Heck I almost believe they might believe that themselves.

Ahh, so just you left to convert to reality.:D
 
Why? I get some books for my group from sources other than N21. I have zero idea where their profits go either, nor do I particular care.

Nor should you. It's when you buy books from your UPLINE that you should worry about whether they are ripping you off. You are being purposefully dense and evasive here. There is a difference!

There's no disclosure on where Amway's profits go either. Nor is there for stuff I buy via Amazon.com for my group.

If you buy something from Amazon does amazon send you some kickback money? If not then it's not relevant.


And yet you've provided exactly ZERO data to support your claims. :cool:

That's because I have no data to give. I can only warn people.

The first claim I dispute, the latter is clearly business idiocy. I've had folk go out and, against my counsel, buy laptops they can't afford because they wanted to show the plan on a laptop. That makes DELL a bad company?

No, it makes that person a moron. If you told them to buy a laptop, they did and then dell gave you a kickback then it would be equivalent.

Ahh yes, so when I make a minor profit (or loss) reselling stuff to my group I bought from amazon.com, I'm really obfuscating by not including amazon.com's profit in the equation! :rolleyes:

Only if amazon is giving you a kickback that creates profit for you that you don't disclose.

(1) Why?
(2) I buy the stuff from N21, though in a manner similar to the Amway business it can be considered "via my upline", who buys it from N21.

The fundamental issue is that the upline has a very good reason to lie to you and hugely mark stuff up and then steal all of the profit while your downline loses money on tools. Very simple. Same reasons amway itself isn't a good deal except worse because it's hidden.


From my info, editing, mastering and packaging actually works out about a buck/cd.

I can roll with that. How much does a CD cost to your downline? Explain where every dollar goes.

Oh right. Only income matters, expenses don't. :rolleyes:

If the company is private and they don't publish info then we don't know how they come to their numbers. My company made a very small profit last year because we send the money out as bonuses. This doesn't show up as "profit" but it could easily be if we stopped paying bonuses. How much money does Jim Dornan get from N21 every year excluding volume rebates?

I'm talking about generic seminars for network marketing businesses. You claim that's not transferrable to an Amway business? And that latter claim is generally rubbish anyway. For the last decade I haven't been building an Amway business but I've often attended seminars and purchased materials *precisely* because I've found the info/training/inspiration *is* transferable to other businesses. Many others have said the same, including well known financial advisors.

Boo-hoo. I call BS, yes your cult materials are garbage and not suitable for other enterprises.

Your claim isn't about one diamond making profits, it's about ALL diamonds. N21 is owned by one Diamond, it's provides products and services to several hundred Diamonds.

No, let's be clear. Some diamonds (and above) will get a much bigger cut than others. It's all about leverage, negotiation ability, size of network etc. More than likely the vast profits from N21 go into a relatively small number of hands. The "tools rebate" is how they spread the wealth throughout the organization and give it a legit veneer. The real money is the profits from N21.

This is a very well executed scam that has multiple layers of insulation. There's no way any of these guys are even going to jail or anything like that. However, that doesn't mean people should get involved!


Nope, I don't believe it's wrong for a company to make a profit, in fact I think it's right as it generates incentives. And that's from someone who'd be a registered Democrat if I was an American. :cool:

I own a company. I understand making a profit is good. However, what N21 and other orgs do is basically scam people out of money (whilst brainwashing them). It is a business cult, plain and simple.

Also, how much money have you made from this? Where does your authority in these matters come from? You are *one of the scammed*!!!

Please stop spinning and go out and make a million and prove me wrong. I tire of the same conversation over and over with nothing new. I have a *real* business to run here and I feel compelled to correct your misinformation which takes me away from making money ;)
 
Nor should you. It's when you buy books from your UPLINE that you should worry about whether they are ripping you off. You are being purposefully dense and evasive here. There is a difference!

I already told you, Jim Dornan was not part of my upline when I joined. He is in some of my international businesses. Even so, are you suggesting N21 should sell products at different prices, depending on whether the purchaser is in the company owners immediate Amway downline?

That is probably actually illegal, offering discounts on products from one company if you sign a contract with another business.

Still, how does one judge whether one is getting ripped off? I do it by comparing with the competitors. Books I get from N21 are nearly always cheaper than the exact same book from competitors like Amazon. Seminar tickets are nearly always cheaper than similar events put on by more generic competitors. CDs/websites/etc are nearly always cheaper than similar events put on by more generic competitors.

And that's getting ripped off??? :covereyes

If you buy something from Amazon does amazon send you some kickback money? If not then it's not relevant.

Well, kind of, I'm an amazon affiliate and order through my affiliate number. Still, you think I'm getting ripped off if I buy a book from N21 cheaper than from Amazon, because someone else apart from N21 is getting a "kick back"?

Interesting view of the world.

That's because I have no data to give.

bingo!


No, it makes that person a moron. If you told them to buy a laptop, they did and then dell gave you a kickback then it would be equivalent.

And if they couldn't afford it, and I knew it, then it would be immoral, I absolutely agree.

Only if amazon is giving you a kickback that creates profit for you that you don't disclose.

The fact platinums and above may earn incomes on tools has been formally publicised by Amway for well over a decade. They didn't need to tell me, when I just I just simply assumed that if someone was selling me something, then someone was probably making money on it.

The fundamental issue is that the upline has a very good reason to lie to you and hugely mark stuff up and then steal all of the profit while your downline loses money on tools.

No they don't, that would be idiotic. Even if they were making the majority of their profit on tools (which most are not) then how would they earn more profit? By getting more customers for the tools, which means helping people build larger Amway businesses.

I can roll with that. How much does a CD cost to your downline? Explain where every dollar goes.

In the US, $7 retail for a CD, $1 for that part of production, up to $2.20 in volume rebates, so wholesale price is $4.80. That leaves $3.80/CD to cover operating expenses and profit to the company owners.

How much money does Jim Dornan get from N21 every year excluding volume rebates?

Don't know, don't care. Don't care how much Bill Gates gets either.

I call BS, yes your cult materials are garbage and not suitable for other enterprises.

Yup, standard ad hominem when you've got nothing to actually say - "you're a liar!" :rolleyes:

No, let's be clear. Some diamonds (and above) will get a much bigger cut than others. It's all about leverage, negotiation ability, size of network etc.

Nope, not the way N21 operates. I'm aware that's how things used to happen in the Britt/Yager affiliated networks - it was one of the reasons why so many BSM lawsuits arose. N21 is larger than the B/Y networks yet has never had one of those types of lawsuits. Indeed no group outside of the B/Y network has. Doesn't that make you even pause for a moment and wonder if perhaps the B/Y network was doing things differently?

B/Y doesn't do things that way anymore either, indeed nobody does. Amway accreditation requires fair contractual agreements that have been evaluated by an independent outside third party.

Your information is (a) limited to the B/Y networks and (b) increasingly outdated even there.
 
Last edited:
I already told you, Jim Dornan was not part of my upline when I joined. He is in some of my international businesses. Even so, are you suggesting N21 should sell products at different prices, depending on whether the purchaser is in the company owners immediate Amway downline?

You are the biggest spinner I've ever met, congratulations!

I'm not talking about amway upline. Do you or do you not recognize that there are 2 pyramids here? One for tools and one for products.


That is probably actually illegal, offering discounts on products from one company if you sign a contract with another business.

Doubtful. The way they've framed it I think it would be hard to prove it was illegal, just immoral and a scam.

Still, how does one judge whether one is getting ripped off? I do it by comparing with the competitors. Books I get from N21 are nearly always cheaper than the exact same book from competitors like Amazon. Seminar tickets are nearly always cheaper than similar events put on by more generic competitors. CDs/websites/etc are nearly always cheaper than similar events put on by more generic competitors.

It's not a deal if you don't need it.

Well, kind of, I'm an amazon affiliate and order through my affiliate number. Still, you think I'm getting ripped off if I buy a book from N21 cheaper than from Amazon, because someone else apart from N21 is getting a "kick back"?

If you had several thousand employees and you told them that to succeed that they need to each buy a certain book from Amazon using your affialiate number than I would have a problem with that.

If you upline says you need to buy X from the system network and they tell you about the volume rebate system I don't have a problem with that. If I then found out later that you owned this company and that it made tens of millions in profits every year I would have a problem with that.



And if they couldn't afford it, and I knew it, then it would be immoral, I absolutely agree.

Nobody can "afford" to be in amway or buying cult materials.

The fact platinums and above may earn incomes on tools has been formally publicised by Amway for well over a decade. They didn't need to tell me, when I just I just simply assumed that if someone was selling me something, then someone was probably making money on it.

So you are ok with scientology and how they sell their secrets then?


No they don't, that would be idiotic. Even if they were making the majority of their profit on tools (which most are not) then how would they earn more profit? By getting more customers for the tools, which means helping people build larger Amway businesses.

I wrote a big thing about amway recruiting strategy and then deleted it. Suffice it to say there are multiple things at play here. Some people are fast tracked into the organization because they have a role to play (for example giving legitimacy). Most people are just taught to recruit more drones though.


In the US, $7 retail for a CD, $1 for that part of production, up to $2.20 in volume rebates, so wholesale price is $4.80. That leaves $3.80/CD to cover operating expenses and profit to the company owners.

So I give them access to my downline and they get to spend 50% of the money flowing through my organization on "expenses" and profit? How many CD's do they sell per year again? You've just proved my entire point here. This money is going somewhere and it's not "expenses". I think we should do a simple test. Find out how many CD's they sell per year and how many employees they have. We can then make a stab at working out costs.

Don't know, don't care. Don't care how much Bill Gates gets either.

Of course you don't. Your brainmasters have told you not to care.


Nope, not the way N21 operates. I'm aware that's how things used to happen in the Britt/Yager affiliated networks - it was one of the reasons why so many BSM lawsuits arose. N21 is larger than the B/Y networks yet has never had one of those types of lawsuits. Indeed no group outside of the B/Y network has. Doesn't that make you even pause for a moment and wonder if perhaps the B/Y network was doing things differently?

B/Y doesn't do things that way anymore either, indeed nobody does. Amway accreditation requires fair contractual agreements that have been evaluated by an independent outside third party.

Your information is (a) limited to the B/Y networks and (b) increasingly outdated even there.

Yeah, it's all official and nobody gets any kickbacks. They wouldn't even be able to run their business this way as they'd have no customers. If I'm a diamond bringing thousands of downline to N21 as customers I have some leverage to negotiate on the $2.20 in rebates. Are you telling me this NEVER EVER EVER happens? I know that you haven't done much in the business world but be serious for a moment please! If it was me and I was bringing an org in to be his customer I would negotiate for equity in N21 and get my cut that way. Wouldn't even be illegal from what I can tell.
 
So I was searching the internet on this topic and I ran across this thread :

http://www.webraw.com/quixtar/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=151&start=23

It's basically the same discussion we are having here (I didn't like to the first post I recommend reading from the beginning).

I have no comments as I haven't finished reading it. I just thought it interesting that you've been this prolific for this long defending amway without hitting "the big bucks" by building a diamond level business.
 
Right, let's cut to the chase here, these posts are getting way to long and awkward. You've finally given some kind of reason for think it's a "rip off", but the reason isn't really that, it's simply one of deceit and motivation.

You think it's wrong for someone in a position of trust or leadership to promote something without the person(s) they're promoting it to being aware the promoter is earning a profit, and it's especially immoral if that profit is their motivation for promotion.

Would that be a correct summation?
 
Right, let's cut to the chase here, these posts are getting way to long and awkward. You've finally given some kind of reason for think it's a "rip off", but the reason isn't really that, it's simply one of deceit and motivation.

You think it's wrong for someone in a position of trust or leadership to promote something without the person(s) they're promoting it to being aware the promoter is earning a profit, and it's especially immoral if that profit is their motivation for promotion.

Would that be a correct summation?

This is part of it. Keep in mind that there is also a bait and switch here as well because if you are lying about tool money you are also lying about what really makes someone money in amway.

In addition I truly believe that the information on these "tools" is, for the most part, brainwashing garbage meant to get you excited about buying more of the same. The emphasis on the amount of tools and seminars is purely to pump up the profit for the upline. In other words this isn't accidental they know what they are doing.

Anyway I agree these posts are getting long and I could easily see this going on for hundreds more posts as in the past.

I don't think we have any fundamental disagreement here over the facts (there is money in tools and substantial amounts of that money isn't directly accounted for).

I also think you need to establish more credibility on this issue. I spent some time looking around the internet and found a huge history of you arguing these same points with a ton of other people (most ex amway people who felt like they had been scammed). The amount of time that has passed while you are arguing on the internet seems like it should be long enough that you should be at a higher level within amway at this point. Why aren't you? I'm also starting to think this nonsense about giving your old business to your ex-wife is just a coverup to try and keep some of your credibility. You've been involved for OVER A DECADE. Show me the money!

Explain to use why we should listen to you about business AT ALL. What kind of credibility do you bring when it comes to building or running any kind of business? What makes you the expert who can come in here and tell us this is a great idea? The answer: NOTHING. You have no credibility.
 
So many? There's hardly any that quote FitzPatrick and Taylor! I can give *more* that quote Len Clements - but guess what, Clement's website shouldn't be used as a WP source either!

If you are really Insider201283 the gauntlet for you to produce sources of the same quality as those that used FitzPatrick and Taylor for Clements was thrown back on June 30, 2009 and avoided like the plague.

To paraphrase my own words: 'Either the scholarly review boards across four different professions (business, anthropology, law and psychology) have lost their marbles or FitzPatrick and Taylor are considered reliable. I wager the later is more likely.' Not even one peer reviewed article using Clements was produced while I have found even more that denounce MLMs since then.

In fact looking through google for 'Clements "court certified"|"certified court" expert "Network Marketing"' only blogs, self promotionals, and others parroting nearly verbatim what Clements is saying.

Compare Jon M. Taylor (MBA, PhD)'s old vita (or vitae) to Lee Clements' current Resume. The problem is for something like this vita rather than a resume is what is needed; that along with poor formatting and structure why the resume of Clements looks bloated and amateurish.

wserra at scam.com rips through the resume and shows Clements to be at best a joke..
 
Last edited:
So Icerat, how does it feel to not be a diamond after 10 years pursuing this?

Also I've been doing a lot of looking around on the net and you're even more prolific than even I had suspected. It seems you've also made a lot of enemies with your incessant spin and bs. I thinking about inviting a few people here to help me respond to your spin.
 
That's enough time to build a few million dollar businesses ddude.

And that's precisely what I was doing, until my business partner and our accountant skipped the country, but that's another story.

Though I must say I am curious to here of the multiple million dollar businesses you've built in the past decade. :rolleyes:
 

The Kennedy paper only cites Clement for “When you propose your opportunity, you are offering a business opportunity, a chance at being a true entrepreneur” (Clements, 2000, pp101-102) and some survey data.

The New Professionals: The Rise of Network Marketing. as the Next Major Profession book is a Three Rivers Press whose quality was questionable at best and can be shown to put out stuff like Howl: A Collection of the Best Contemporary Dog Wit. Hardly scholarly.

The Poe book is Prima Lifestyles which is not a scholarly imprint of Random House

From the snippet of the Grumke book the "reference" looks like it simply is in the bibliography with no indication on how the information is used. It is not even clear who the publisher of this even is.

The Rubino book is from Wiley but Clements is mentioned only once and the snippet shows it is right after a url for "Harness the power of the subconscious mind", never mind that I found two Wiley books and a SAGE book that clearly state that MLM are nothing more than legalized Pyramid Schemes:

Carroll, Robert Todd (2003). The Skeptic's Dictionary: A Collection of Strange Beliefs, Amusing Deceptions, and Dangerous Delusions. John Wiley & Sons pp. 235–36. ISBN 0471272426.

Coenen, Tracy (2009). Expert Fraud Investigation: A Step-by-Step Guide. Wiley. pp. 168. ISBN 0470387963.

Salinger (Editor), Lawrence M. (2005). Encyclopedia of White-Collar & Corporate Crime. 2. Sage Publishing. pp. 880. ISBN 0761930043.

Three to one against.

The Manganello paper (in Italian) is a thesis/dissertation rather than a formal paper as what Cruz, Woker, Wong, Sandbek, Koehn, Carl, etc and looks like a bablefish translation--hardly usable.


None of these even comes close to the Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal, Western Journal of Communication, System Dynamics conference or even the McGeorge Law Review and Journal of the American Board of Sport Psychology articles that used FitzPatrick and-or Taylor as references.

Cruz practically quotes Taylor and Sandbek uses him and Fitzpatrick as references to come to the conclusion stated in that article.
 
ROFLMAO!!!

What is this, dueling references? hahhahah

The "Journal of the American Board of Sport Psychology" is NOT a legitimate academic journal. A dozen or so articles were published in various forms only on their extremely unprofessional website. As best I can tell not a single one of them has ever been cited in a peer-reviewed journal.

The Salinger book barely mentions MLM, and is clearly wrong where it does, with the oxymoronic idea of a legal pyramid scheme.

Coenen IS a fraud, but that's for another argument, the book is not published by the "scholarly arm" of Wiley, which you suddenly felt important with regards Random House.

And Carroll's book is merely his website, which is so accurate it refers to Quiztar ... not exactly a book of academic excellence. It's been discussed often on Wikipedia RS/N and the general consensus is it depends on the article and context whether it can be used as a source, but should be avoided if better sources are available.

Whereas The New Professionals is both by a legitimate published AND a recognized business academic in Professor Charles King.

Wave 4 is by a well known and respected journalists, Richard Poe.

The Manganello paper is a PhD thesis and *by definition* peer-reviewed. PhD theses are acceptable sources on Wikipedia.

All of which is beside the point because your claim is that FitzTaylor is a reliable source because they've been cited in a handful of places. The same goes for Clements, and Clements has stronger claims since HE actually has a book published by a legitimate publishing company. FitzTaylor do not.
 

Back
Top Bottom