Missile??

[NoahFence]

You want to talk about the Sun? Why was the same thing seen at the North Tower? The sun moved that much in 15 minutes?

The same thing wasn't seen at the North Tower.








(omg! yes it was11elventy11eleven!!!)


No it wasn't. Your claim is two flashes. One IS a reflection from that big yellow thing in the sky. The other is the O2 bottles going boom. (I'm going with that)

The 1st impact had only the 2nd flash. Both airplanes had O2 in their noses. Why in HELL would you think they should have appeared different?

A missle launch would have been seen by MILLIONS. It would be on the tape of the impact. Missles don't go "flash" then dissapear. You can SEE THEM.

 

[tmd2_1]

If it's so easy, then please explain how it is.

Oh that's right - you don't really know anything at all, you just "know" things.

This patent was made in the early 80's.

http://www.google.com/patents?id=KF...urce=gbs_overview_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

 

[cyclonic]

Flight 175 8x slow truther video



you lose!!!

NEXT!!!

 

[Sunstealer]

If it's so easy, then please explain how it is.

Oh that's right - you don't really know anything at all, you just "know" things.

Do pilots do a pre-flight check that includes walking round the aircraft? I suppose they'd miss a bloody great big missile hanging off a non-standard pylon. I expect all the ground crew and people servicing the aircraft would not blink an eye at a missile on the wing of a commercial jet.

 

[TJM]

This patent was made in the early 80's.

http://www.google.com/patents?id=KF...urce=gbs_overview_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

Hmmm....doesn't sound all that easy. I'd think the passengers would notice if they had nowhere to sit, for instance.

You know there were passengers, don't you?

 

[NoahFence]

This patent was made in the early 80's.

http://www.google.com/patents?id=KF...urce=gbs_overview_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false

You're going with that system as your launch?


ARE YOU SURE?

 

[NoahFence]

Just in case he doesn't come back real quick, I thought I'd just go ahead and get the answer out there. It's good to get stuff done quick:

Noah:

Youu're going with that system as your launch?


ARE YOU SURE?

TMD:

"No, but that was 1984! Just think of what they^TM could have come up with by now. I'm not saying they did, but I'm 100% sure that they could have!


/twoofer mode off

 

[dafydd]

I'm not dodging anything. Anything I could say is pure speculation. It certainly could be done. It's not that hard to mount a commercial A/C with a projectile missile. You are asking me questions I can't possibly answer. I've often said the planes not being piloted by human hands, is the most difficult part of any conspiracy theory. Such an important part would not have been left to human hands. I don't know how it was done (assuming it was done) I do know if there was a conspiracy, it would have had to have been done.

You have shown that there was no conspiracy. Thank you for your sterling efforts.

 

[dafydd]

Do pilots do a pre-flight check that includes walking round the aircraft? I suppose they'd miss a bloody great big missile hanging off a non-standard pylon. I expect all the ground crew and people servicing the aircraft would not blink an eye at a missile on the wing of a commercial jet.

Yet more people to add to tmd's list of people in on it. It grows larger all the time.

 

[TJM]

Do pilots do a pre-flight check that includes walking round the aircraft? I suppose they'd miss a bloody great big missile hanging off a non-standard pylon. I expect all the ground crew and people servicing the aircraft would not blink an eye at a missile on the wing of a commercial jet.

Well apparently, it's not your average missile system. It's invisible, small, designed to be launched milliseconds from its intended target at point blank range and its payload is the 767 that launched it.

 

[tmd2_1]

Just in case he doesn't come back real quick, I thought I'd just go ahead and get the answer out there. It's good to get stuff done quick:



TMD:

"No, but that was 1984! Just think of what they^TM could have come up with by now. I'm not saying they did, but I'm 100% sure that they could have!


/twoofer mode off

That isn't my answer the question was show it could be done. So I did.

 

[NoahFence]

No you didn't. You didn't even come close to showing how it could be done.

 

[TJM]

That isn't my answer the question was show it could be done. So I did.

No, that wasn't the question:

If it's so easy, then please explain how it is.
Oh that's right - you don't really know anything at all, you just "know" things.

You have not explained how it would be "easy".

 

[djlunacee]

Only one answer was even possible, though I have not found any data that suggests anything like we saw is a static discharge. That also doesn't even begin to explain the flash coming out of the back of the A/C.

I'm sure insurance companies can handle there own business. I find it inexcusable that the serial numbers were never verified. Yet "debunkers" have no problem with this.

What a transponder is turned off? Well why didn't the same thing happen to Flight 11? Why does it appear (I can't say with 100% determination) that the plane was flying AWAY from New York? Something that never should have happened that day. This is all the more reason why those serial numbers should have been identified.

Wrong. The transponder was turned off on flight 11.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AA11_path.svg

At what point is flight 11 flying away from NYC?


So you are sure the insurance companies can handle their business correctly? Glad you said that. If they had no problems with paying on the lost planes, who really cares what you find acceptable or not? As you state they are capable enough to handle their business.

 

[tmd2_1]

Wrong. The transponder was turned off on flight 11.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:AA11_path.svg

At what point is flight 11 flying away from NYC?


So you are sure the insurance companies can handle their business correctly? Glad you said that. If they had no problems with paying on the lost planes, who really cares what you find acceptable or not? As you state they are capable enough to handle their business.

Right it was turned off, so why didn't it show up like 175 did in that video? Kind of crazy isn't it? No I meant 175 was seems to be flying away from New York according to the flight explorer data we see, in that video.

 

[NoahFence]

Right it was turned off, so why didn't it show up like 175 did in that video? Kind of crazy isn't it? No I meant 175 was seems to be flying away from New York according to the flight explorer data we see, in that video.

Wow. That absolutely proves that there was a massive missile launching system on the bottom of the aircraft that millions of people didn't see launching a missile that nobody saw, that would somehow assist a 767 travelling at 500mph enter a high-rise.


Or not.

 

[BasqueArch]

In case it hasn't been mentioned - from Scott Sommers post

How the airplane wing cut through the exterior columns of the World Trade Center is a technical research paper written by T. Wierzbicki and X. Teng.

How the airplane wing cut through the exterior columns of the World Trade Center

T. Wierzbicki, and X. Teng
Department of Ocean Engineering, Impact & Crashworthiness Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Room 5-218 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139-4307, USA


Received 20 April 2002.
Available online 11 December 2002.

Abstract

The problem of the airplane wing cutting through the exterior columns of the World Trade Center is treated analytically. The exterior columns are thin-walled box beam made of high strength steel. The complex structure of the airplane is lumped into another box, but it has been found that the equivalent thickness of the box is an order of magnitude larger than the column thickness. The problem can be then modeled as an impact of a rigid mass traveling with the velocity of 240 m/s into a hollow box-like vertical member. The deformation and failure process is very local and is broken into three phases: shearing of the impacting flange; tearing of side webs; and tensile fracture of the rear flange. Using the exact dynamic solution in the membrane deformation mode, the critical impact velocity to fracture the impacted flange was calculated to be 155 m/s for both flat and round impacting mass. Therefore, the wing would easily cut through the outer column. It was also found that the energy absorbed by plastic deformation and fracture of the ill-fated column is only 6.7% of the initial kinetic energy of the wing.

2) Also the missile would have left a propellant trail - unseen.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~

French Netted Mimes Silently Remove WTC's 36 Foot Steel Columns
Quietly Bring Down 8 Foot Elevators
Past 3 Foot Doors

"'...' scuse me ... 'scuse me ... 'scuse me..."
Clumsy Andre The Giant's Column Knocks Over
Tfk's Desk Bromeliad.







​

 

[I Ratant]

They could have cut the original columns out in smaller sections and sent the pieces down in the freight elevators. The much lighter replacement columns could have then been mounted in sections in the place of the original steel columns. It would have been pretty easy to do.

.
Even easier, explaining to the the brain damaged
Set it up this way...
Get 4 teams of dedicated suicides to hijack 4 airplanes and crash them.
Nothing more need be done.

 

[Dash80]

They could have cut the original columns out in smaller sections and sent the pieces down in the freight elevators. The much lighter replacement columns could have then been mounted in sections in the place of the original steel columns. It would have been pretty easy to do.

Yes I suppose in Trutherville every ridiculous idea is easy. Now back to the real world.

The problem is bill, your idiotic theory would actually be quite complicated, it could not be done secretly thats for sure. Replacing load bearing exterior columns... that's a big construction job. Nobody looking up would notice? Nobody working on those floors noticed? Ridiculous bill, really.

 

[dafydd]

Yes I suppose in Trutherville every ridiculous idea is easy. Now back to the real world.

The problem is bill, your idiotic theory would actually be quite complicated, it could not be done secretly thats for sure. Replacing load bearing exterior columns... that's a big construction job. Nobody looking up would notice? Nobody working on those floors noticed? Ridiculous bill, really.

You should know by now that bill is not meant to be taken seriously.