Missile??

[NoahFence]

No one has given a plausible answer to what either of those two flashes are.

The only explanation.

 

[triforcharity]

Noah, I'm thinking this.

He's missing his tin foil hat though.

 

[ElMondoHummus]

Again, tmd, just because a patent exists for something does not mean it was ever fully developed. If you want to point to a patent for proof of your theory, you need to find one that was fully developed, tested, and USED.

I'm betting you can't.

What? You've never seen a passenger jet shoot a missile out the side door before?

 

[Dave Rogers]

What? You've never seen a passenger jet shoot a missile out the side door before?

Maybe that's how the invisible parachuting Mossad ninjas got out before the impact.

Dave

 

[I Ratant]

What? You've never seen a passenger jet shoot a missile out the side door before?

.
His version of Worlds of Warcraft hasn't been updated.
The next time Mommy unlocks the basement and takes him -to the store-... (a big day for a truther, that,) he can whine and pester and maybe she'll get it for him.

 

[dafydd]

Again, tmd, just because a patent exists for something does not mean it was ever fully developed. If you want to point to a patent for proof of your theory, you need to find one that was fully developed, tested, and USED.

I'm betting you can't.

Your money is safe.

 

[tmd2_1]

Again, tmd, just because a patent exists for something does not mean it was ever fully developed. If you want to point to a patent for proof of your theory, you need to find one that was fully developed, tested, and USED.

I'm betting you can't.

I'm not going to get into this. The perps would have had plenty of time to test whatever they came up with. I see no reason why what he did would not work.

 

[GlennB]

I see no reason why what he did would not work.

You have succumbed to the cult of the all-powerful Man

He does weird and mysterious things, way beyond the understanding of we mere mortals. Maybe he is a Sirian lizard space-alien thingy?

ffs tmd2_1, you are making a total fool of yourself. Take your nonsense over to the local pub or bar and see how much you are laughed at. Come down to earth.

 

[dafydd]

I'm not going to get into this. The perps would have had plenty of time to test whatever they came up with. I see no reason why what he did would not work.

You will do anything except face reality and answer awkward questions.

 

[tmd2_1]

You have succumbed to the cult of the all-powerful Man

He does weird and mysterious things, way beyond the understanding of we mere mortals. Maybe he is a Sirian lizard space-alien thingy?

ffs tmd2_1, you are making a total fool of yourself. Take your nonsense over to the local pub or bar and see how much you are laughed at. Come down to earth.

HE would be the owner of patent.

 

[dafydd]

HE would be the owner of patent.

Sigh.

 

[Sam.I.Am]

I'm not going to get into this. The perps would have had plenty of time to test whatever they came up with. I see no reason why what he did would not work.

It's not about whether or not it would work.

You're position is solely (as in with no other "evidence" to support your claim other than your mistaken interpretation of a flash) based upon the visual record available. Your fantasy device is not visible in the images that you yourself use. You are only fooling yourself (and entertaining us) by twisting and contorting to fit it into your fantasies about "Perps".

 

[Sabrina]

I'm not going to get into this. The perps would have had plenty of time to test whatever they came up with. I see no reason why what he did would not work.

And yet again you fail to comprehend; why am I surprised?

Let me see if I can explain this again; you point to a patent that was assigned in the 1980's that allows for a missile system to be installed in a passenger aircraft. I point out that just because a patent exists for something means exactly bupkis, because people patent IDEAS all the time that never see fruition, and request that you show evidence that show such a device was ever developed, tested, USED, and patented (because I can just about guarantee someone would have patented it; the US government holds literally thousands of patents in its own right, if I'm not mistaken, so the likelihood of someone NOT patenting this thing, whatever it is, is pretty damn low). You come back and give me exactly NO support to indicate that this device or a similar one exists, merely stating that you see no reason why it wouldn't work.

I'll tell you why it wouldn't work; because there is no EVIDENCE of it. The whole point of getting a patent is to make money of a device if it is ever created, and yet we see no evidence ten YEARS after 9/11 that missile systems are being installed in passenger aircraft in any country in the entire friggin' world.

There's a huge difference between possible and probable that I don't think you're getting here, tmd. Is it POSSIBLE that a missile system was somehow fitted on to a passenger aircraft and fired right before the aircraft hit the towers? Sure; it's POSSIBLE, the same way it's possible for monkeys to suddenly start speaking in human tongue; but probable? Um, no, for numerous reasons. A) The missile system would have been visible, either from the outside or the inside of the aircraft, and would have to have been known to the crew, the maintenance personnel, and the various airport workers prior to the ship taking off, which would have made it known to just about everyone in the world after the reporters got to them. B) There would have been eyewitness testimony stating they saw a missile contrail or something similar just before the plane impacted, and guess what; there's NONE. C) There would have been physical evidence of a missile impact on the material left over from the collapse, and there was NONE. No holes bored in support columns, no residue from the particular kind of explosive the missile would have been using, no fragments of the missile casing; NOTHING. This is why your theory is ludicrous, insane, and downright stupid; you cannot produce any EVIDENCE for it. All you have is sheer speculation, and let me tell you, there is no sane person in the world that is going to believe you if you don't give them PROOF.

 

[dafydd]

there is no sane person in the world that is going to believe you if you don't give them PROOF.

The Trutherland customs confiscate all proof.

 

[I Ratant]

Sigh.

.
That's the short form for invincibly ignorant.

 

[tmd2_1]

And yet again you fail to comprehend; why am I surprised?

Let me see if I can explain this again; you point to a patent that was assigned in the 1980's that allows for a missile system to be installed in a passenger aircraft. I point out that just because a patent exists for something means exactly bupkis, because people patent IDEAS all the time that never see fruition, and request that you show evidence that show such a device was ever developed, tested, USED, and patented (because I can just about guarantee someone would have patented it; the US government holds literally thousands of patents in its own right, if I'm not mistaken, so the likelihood of someone NOT patenting this thing, whatever it is, is pretty damn low). You come back and give me exactly NO support to indicate that this device or a similar one exists, merely stating that you see no reason why it wouldn't work.

I'll tell you why it wouldn't work; because there is no EVIDENCE of it. The whole point of getting a patent is to make money of a device if it is ever created, and yet we see no evidence ten YEARS after 9/11 that missile systems are being installed in passenger aircraft in any country in the entire friggin' world.

There's a huge difference between possible and probable that I don't think you're getting here, tmd. Is it POSSIBLE that a missile system was somehow fitted on to a passenger aircraft and fired right before the aircraft hit the towers? Sure; it's POSSIBLE, the same way it's possible for monkeys to suddenly start speaking in human tongue; but probable? Um, no, for numerous reasons. A) The missile system would have been visible, either from the outside or the inside of the aircraft, and would have to have been known to the crew, the maintenance personnel, and the various airport workers prior to the ship taking off, which would have made it known to just about everyone in the world after the reporters got to them. B) There would have been eyewitness testimony stating they saw a missile contrail or something similar just before the plane impacted, and guess what; there's NONE. C) There would have been physical evidence of a missile impact on the material left over from the collapse, and there was NONE. No holes bored in support columns, no residue from the particular kind of explosive the missile would have been using, no fragments of the missile casing; NOTHING. This is why your theory is ludicrous, insane, and downright stupid; you cannot produce any EVIDENCE for it. All you have is sheer speculation, and let me tell you, there is no sane person in the world that is going to believe you if you don't give them PROOF.

What your asking for is a bit ridiculous. In fact I will tell you what it is kind of like asking for. I assume you accept NIST's analysis as correct...right? Yet they haven't "produced" anything. What I mean by that is the towers haven't been rebuilt and planes flown into to them at the same speeds in the same locations. I mean that's the only way we can be sure what they say is right...would it not? But you still accept NIST's analysis right? But you know I think it's a great idea (of course I know it won't happen), we should build all 3 towers, exact replicas, put them the exact distance from each other, and fly planes into the exact location at the same or similar speeds. Of course we would need people on both sides to make sure things are fair and exactly the way things would have been on that day, you know just in case....I'd love to see the results to that especially 7, most of you would be probably be hyper ventilating, because you have a pretty good idea the results of this experiment would not be what you want to see.

 

[TJM]

What your asking for is a bit ridiculous. In fact I will tell you what it is kind of like asking for. I assume you accept NIST's analysis as correct...right? Yet they haven't "produced" anything. What I mean by that is the towers haven't been rebuilt and planes flown into to them at the same speeds in the same locations. I mean that's the only way we can be sure what they say is right...would it not? But you still accept NIST's analysis right? But you know I think it's a great idea (of course I know it won't happen), we should build all 3 towers, exact replicas, put them the exact distance from each other, and fly planes into the exact location at the same or similar speeds. Of course we would need people on both sides to make sure things are fair and exactly the way things would have been on that day, you know just in case....I'd love to see the results to that especially 7, most of you would be probably be hyper ventilating, because you have a pretty good idea the results of this experiment would not be what you want to see.

Stundied.

 

[dafydd]

What your asking for is a bit ridiculous. In fact I will tell you what it is kind of like asking for. I assume you accept NIST's analysis as correct...right? Yet they haven't "produced" anything. What I mean by that is the towers haven't been rebuilt and planes flown into to them at the same speeds in the same locations. I mean that's the only way we can be sure what they say is right...would it not? But you still accept NIST's analysis right? But you know I think it's a great idea (of course I know it won't happen), we should build all 3 towers, exact replicas, put them the exact distance from each other, and fly planes into the exact location at the same or similar speeds. Of course we would need people on both sides to make sure things are fair and exactly the way things would have been on that day, you know just in case....I'd love to see the results to that especially 7, most of you would be probably be hyper ventilating, because you have a pretty good idea the results of this experiment would not be what you want to see.

You have lost touch with the reality of 911. That is just nonsense. Stundie of the month? That is the all time winner.

 

[Dash80]

What your asking for is a bit ridiculous. In fact I will tell you what it is kind of like asking for. I assume you accept NIST's analysis as correct...right? Yet they haven't "produced" anything. What I mean by that is the towers haven't been rebuilt and planes flown into to them at the same speeds in the same locations. I mean that's the only way we can be sure what they say is right...would it not? But you still accept NIST's analysis right? But you know I think it's a great idea (of course I know it won't happen), we should build all 3 towers, exact replicas, put them the exact distance from each other, and fly planes into the exact location at the same or similar speeds. Of course we would need people on both sides to make sure things are fair and exactly the way things would have been on that day, you know just in case....I'd love to see the results to that especially 7, most of you would be probably be hyper ventilating, because you have a pretty good idea the results of this experiment would not be what you want to see.

Are you *********** serious? Rebuild 3 buildings, two of them the tallest in Manhattan and fly planes into them? What the **** dude!

Just NO! That is not how investigations are done, not even before computer modeling.

The British Board of Trade didn't rebuild the Titanic and sail her into an iceberg, just to see exactly what would happen.

 

[Sabrina]

What your asking for is a bit ridiculous. In fact I will tell you what it is kind of like asking for. I assume you accept NIST's analysis as correct...right? Yet they haven't "produced" anything. What I mean by that is the towers haven't been rebuilt and planes flown into to them at the same speeds in the same locations. I mean that's the only way we can be sure what they say is right...would it not? But you still accept NIST's analysis right? But you know I think it's a great idea (of course I know it won't happen), we should build all 3 towers, exact replicas, put them the exact distance from each other, and fly planes into the exact location at the same or similar speeds. Of course we would need people on both sides to make sure things are fair and exactly the way things would have been on that day, you know just in case....I'd love to see the results to that especially 7, most of you would be probably be hyper ventilating, because you have a pretty good idea the results of this experiment would not be what you want to see.

There are no words to describe how hard you fail.

Truly epic.