Militia question 1
- Thread starter CFLarsen
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2nd amendment issues
From that thread, one of Claus's questions:
You don't have any guns? Prove it.
How is Shanek supposed to prove a negative? Everywhere one looks and doesn't find a gun, one could always say they haven't looked hard enough or in the right locations, etc.
You don't have any guns? Prove it.
How is Shanek supposed to prove a negative? Everywhere one looks and doesn't find a gun, one could always say they haven't looked hard enough or in the right locations, etc.
CFLarsen said:
Actually, he said he would do it "soley to piss you off." No threat, no intimidation (except perhaps to a sissy scrap of eurotrash such as yourself).
Looks like he's succeeded, doesn't it?
By the way, Claus, as long as Shane takes the time to fill out a form or two, he's perfectly entitled to pack heat. Take a look at the Las Vegas Police Department site, which states clearly that "...out-of-state residents may now apply for a Nevada concealed firearms permit from the Sheriff of any county in the State of Nevada."
Have a nice flight, douchebag.
crimresearch
Alumbrado
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Messages
- 10,600
What reaction?
No self respecting, rational, skeptic would allow their emotions and uncontrolled, imaginary fears to dictate a superstitious reaction to something as non-threatening as a law abiding citizen peacefully and safely carrying a simple piece of machinery, would they?
That would smack more of woo...
No self respecting, rational, skeptic would allow their emotions and uncontrolled, imaginary fears to dictate a superstitious reaction to something as non-threatening as a law abiding citizen peacefully and safely carrying a simple piece of machinery, would they?
That would smack more of woo...
Patricio Elicer
Obsessed with Reality
Folks, I can't believe that the level of debate has reached the point where the possibility of taking a gun to a public meeting is being considered. Even if it is just to "p!ss off" another person, I find it simply unacceptable.
crimresearch
Alumbrado
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2004
- Messages
- 10,600
Mmmmm....
Patricio, would the mere presence of the gun concern you? Would you feel the same way if someone posted that they were working Law Enforcement nearby, and would be stopping by in uniform, and armed?
What would be the difference then between someone who is legally allowed to carry as part of their job, and someone who is legally allowed to carry as a private ctizen, showing up at TAM?
Because nothing I've seen referred to here has crossed any sort of line into illegality.
Patricio, would the mere presence of the gun concern you? Would you feel the same way if someone posted that they were working Law Enforcement nearby, and would be stopping by in uniform, and armed?
What would be the difference then between someone who is legally allowed to carry as part of their job, and someone who is legally allowed to carry as a private ctizen, showing up at TAM?
Because nothing I've seen referred to here has crossed any sort of line into illegality.
Ed said:
Exactly, but good luck explaining it to Claus. It's not enough that he's bringing European standards, apparently he thinks he can pack a suitcase with European laws to bring along too.
With all that extra baggage, how's he supposed to fit his ego on the plane?
Doubt
Philosopher
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2002
- Messages
- 8,106
I just read the last two pages of this thread.
What a stupid argument. Claus and Shane should both just pack it in. There is nothing being “debated†anymore. You both are looking like fools.
Just to give you both something to chew on, consider the following:
The Stardust is private property. Arguments about bringing a gun to TAM are pointless. Consider that you are gong to be on somebody else’s property where they do get to set the rules.
What a stupid argument. Claus and Shane should both just pack it in. There is nothing being “debated†anymore. You both are looking like fools.
Just to give you both something to chew on, consider the following:
The Stardust is private property. Arguments about bringing a gun to TAM are pointless. Consider that you are gong to be on somebody else’s property where they do get to set the rules.