But MM surely knows what Flint was like. His family worked there, the plant had a huge impact on the whole area.
I asked for evidence of that. He grew up in davison. If it was such a big deal to them you could present evidence about davison, not flint.
Why do you keep missing the point about the plant being so dominating in the society?
because you failed to provide evidence of problems in davison.
I provided evidence that the closing of the plant meant serious economic problems for the whole area.
it said 'flint and other cities', it mentions davison no where.
Listen, I grew up in a city that had a company that employed over half the town, and it closed. Being middle class to begin with made it not such a big deal because the majority of citizens already had college educations and marketable job skills, and ended up commuting to work instead of falling into poverty.
that seems to be the trend near flint as well, and since you wont provide any evidence i went looking for myself. I even used the same source as you did. from the wikipedia article on flint:
The city has seen a major decline while its suburbs have flourished. Outlying towns such as Grand Blanc and Swartz Creek have seen significant growth and development as bedroom communities. Many professionals who work in the Metro Detroit area have moved outward due to lower taxes, lower housing costs and larger lot sizes. Numerous residential subdivisions have been built in recent years to meet this demand.
and no, this doesnt mention davison specifically, so i went looking for more information.
and the wikipedia article on davison:
The median income for a household in the city was $37,482, and the median income for a family was $51,925.
hardly seems to be in as poor of shape as flint.
heres the earnings information for flint
The median income for a household in the city was $28,015, and the median income for a family was $31,424.
now will you admit that what you have said is nonsense?
You are not saying that when a plant that size closes, it has no impact on other people than those who were directly employed there, then?
you seem incapable of reading and addressing what I wrote, and keep trying to ignore this part, so I guess I will post it again.
No, you were saying i was 'bitching' about how MM decided to make his films, and I was saying that I am certainly going to bitch about deceitful statements presented as fact, and then i provided an example of that. it was the woman with her weird rabbit business being represented as someone who is poor because of the plant closing when in fact she was poor because her husband died over a decade before, and posted a link providing evidence of that. Now tell me why I shouldnt think that its wrong for him to lie/misrepresent events and present them as fact, instead of throwing an unrelated question my way.
No, why don't we stick to what is discussed in this thread, namely MM and his current film?
because this hasnt been resolved yet.
What, in his current film about Cuba is so bad? Where does he lie?
I havent seen it and I dont know, which is why I have been discussing his other films.