Michael Flynn charged

[plague311]

Seems like you wouldn't have the public plea deal this early if the intent was to have Flynn participate in a larger case.

Depends on what they needed from him. They raided his house and took troves of documents. If all they needed was for him to confirm the **** they were reading, then it wouldn't take much. Why bother with a witness if you have it on paper?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk

 

[Vixen]

The Flynn Effect

Sounds like an 'obstruction of justice charge' (or does there really exist in US law a charge called 'lying to the FBI'?).

I think maximum sentence is circa five years in most US state.

Perhaps Flynn is the sacrificial goat for others.

 

[Aber]

The idea being that there was no crime until the authorities came in and asked questions, and the person is then charged with lying to the authorities about some aspect of the questioning.

Doing a deal with the Russian ambassador over their response to sanctions on the day they were announced, when you're a private citizen, is problematic.

Telling the FBI that it didn't happen when they have you on tape is just plain stupid.

 

[WilliamSeger]

Seems like you wouldn't have the public plea deal this early if the intent was to have Flynn participate in a larger case.

Hard to say how early or late it is, since Mueller has run a pretty tight ship; he may already be close to a slew of new indictments. But I think the purpose of doing this now is to put pressure on others to flip. There are probably a lot of people worried about what Flynn is saying to Mueller.

 

[johnny karate]

Doesn't this strike you as an abuse of process - surely this run contrary to justice?

A good way to avoid this from happening is to not commit crimes.

 

[The Don]

A good way to avoid this from happening is to not commit crimes.

Or given "innocent until proven guilty", do not get accused of committing crimes

 

[NoahFence]

And of course in keeping with the most insane, stupid and hypocritical administration in US History... there's a Trump tweet for EVERY occasion:

 

[theprestige]

Boy, that's a really light charge based on his actual activities. What in the world would compel them to give him such a light charge?

I think part of it is that his actual activities have been overblown and overhyped in the minds of progressives. They probably include a lot of speculation, a lot of supposition, and a lot of wishful thinking.

And I think part of it is that it's not what you know, it's what you can prove. As a great man might have said, you go to trial with the charges you have, not the charges you wish to have or plan to have at a later date.

But hey, look on the bright side: They got Martha Stewart for the same thing. They got Al Capone for tax evasion. They almost got Bill Clinton for perjury.

 

[johnny karate]

Or given "innocent until proven guilty", do not get accused of committing crimes

I think we’re past that point in this particular case.

 

[NoahFence]

I think part of it is that his actual activities have been overblown and overhyped in the minds of progressives. They probably include a lot of speculation, a lot of supposition, and a lot of wishful thinking.

And I think part of it is that it's not what you know, it's what you can prove. As a great man might have said, you go to trial with the charges you have, not the charges you wish to have or plan to have at a later date.

Or he cut a deal. Is that not also a possibility?

 

[snoop_doxie]

This is often referred to as a "process crime".

The idea being that there was no crime until the authorities came in and asked questions, and the person is then charged with lying to the authorities about some aspect of the questioning.

Are you saying it is no crime for Flynn to talk sanctions with Russia and THEN lie to the FBI?

Do you really think Flynn pleads guilty to a "process crime" without getting
some kind of deal?

 

[alfaniner]

You know it's really BREAKING NEWS! when the CNN actually cuts into a commercial do to the report. Can be scary sometimes.

Fortunately today's BREAKING NEWS! was not tragic but certainly politically significant.

Is this fake news or a nothing burger? I think not. Flynn was a Trump campaign chairman and former National Security Adviser. He is now pleading guilty to federal felony charges.

Of course, FOXNews is leading on their web page with a nasty story about Clinton instead.

 

[Giordano]

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/01/politics/michael-flynn-court-filing/index.html

Doesn't look like much...

This is how plea deals work- a person is presented with a list of serious charges to convince them to cooperate with the prosecutor and reveal information about the involvement of others. In exchange the serious charges are not brought against them and they are charged with a more minor offense instead.

Of course I cannot say this this is a plea deal, but it it has the external hallmarks of one. It will be interesting to see what comes out of it and if Flynn is now testifying about others in the Trump administration.

 

[WilliamSeger]

Not quite.

But I really meant that this was not much in the battle to remove Donald Trump from office.

Mueller is not in that battle.

I agree, but a lot of people do not.

I think it's very much a part of the battle to remove Trump from office with an obstruction of justice impeachment. There is a reason that Trump tried so hard to protect Flynn, and why so many Trump people lied about so many Russian contacts, and if it turns out to be because Trump was aware of illegal activities, I do believe he will be impeached.

 

[BobTheCoward]

This is how plea deals work- a person is presented with a list of serious charges to convince them to cooperate with the prosecutor and reveal information about the involvement of others. In exchange the serious charges are not brought against them and they are charged with a more minor offense instead.

Of course I cannot say this this is a plea deal, but it it has the external hallmarks of one. It will be interesting to see what comes out of it and if Flynn is now testifying about others in the Trump administration.

If it was the extent of what they were able to charge him with, what would be the different external hallmarks?

 

[Trebuchet]

Or he cut a deal. Is that not also a possibility?

That he's cut a deal is blindingly obvious. Perhaps to save his son. Morning news is saying he feels abandoned by Trump.

 

[Trebuchet]

And of course in keeping with the most insane, stupid and hypocritical administration in US History... there's a Trump tweet for EVERY occasion:

[qimg]http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/picture.php?albumid=1270&pictureid=11613[/qimg]

I'm actually astounded that tweet wasn't from this morning.

 

[chrispy]

Of course, FOXNews is leading on their web page with a nasty story about Clinton instead.

I only get Faux News here, and the talking heads agreed that there was no evidence against Trump. They then had a congresswoman on who started talking about the Clinton Foundation and Uranium One. I **** you not.

 

[TheL8Elvis]

I think part of it is that his actual activities have been overblown and overhyped in the minds of progressives. They probably include a lot of speculation, a lot of supposition, and a lot of wishful thinking.

And I think part of it is that it's not what you know, it's what you can prove. As a great man might have said, you go to trial with the charges you have, not the charges you wish to have or plan to have at a later date.

But hey, look on the bright side: They got Martha Stewart for the same thing. They got Al Capone for tax evasion. They almost got Bill Clinton for perjury.

okay.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mich...se-statements-fbi-documents/story?id=50849354

ABC’s Brian Ross says a source familiar with the matter says Flynn is prepared to testify against Trump, members of his family, Trump staff, & that Trump ordered him to contact the Russians. Ross says Flynn made the decision to cooperate 24 hours ago

Probably just "overblown and overhyped in the minds of progressives." though.

 

[BobTheCoward]

okay.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/mich...se-statements-fbi-documents/story?id=50849354

ABC’s Brian Ross says a source familiar with the matter says Flynn is prepared to testify against Trump, members of his family, Trump staff, & that Trump ordered him to contact the Russians. Ross says Flynn made the decision to cooperate 24 hours ago

Probably just "overblown and overhyped in the minds of progressives." though.

Maybe I am blind, but I can't find your italicized text in the link.