Skeptic Ginger
Nasty Woman
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2005
- Messages
- 96,955
I see no reason the attorney wouldn't have vetted the time of the recording.Do you know what time the recording was made?
Since none of these witnesses has come forward and the news media keeps telling us what Wilson's friends and family tell them, that kind of hearsay has far less credibility than Johnson's account.That may be true ... but how do you know this ?
Did this friend tell you that's where she read it ? Or did you just make that up?
Dunn was not a cop or a vigilante on patrol protecting the neighborhood. That case is less analogous.That's an interesting theory. How did it work out for Michael Dunn ?
Do you have some statistics to back up this claim? Or did you just make it up?
As for stats, I'm not sure what you think needs backing up, that cops use excessive force and are rarely held accountable, I don't need to write you a term paper. The effort would be wasted in this thread.
But it's very curious how the rate of police brutality incidents drop precipitously when cops are on camera.
I don't know why you think that required a translation.TRANSLATION: "You're a racist!"
The guy was recording audio for some kind of short message. The recording didn't start until after the first shot.If this is a recording of the shooting, any thoughts as to why the first shot from within the car doesn't show up on the audio? The witness accounts and the police accounts seem pretty consistent on that point. I suppose the shot could have been muffled by the car.
Not everyone is quick on the draw with their phone cameras.I'm finding it difficult to believe that Tiffany did not record the shooting. She says she pulled out her phone to record, but then the shooting started.
Wilson and Brown ran well away from where she was parked, not towards her.
And Wilson's SUV should have been between her and Wilson/Brown.
It's too bad she did not use her phone.
We apparently could have had video of most of the incident.
If she had just started it recording and ducked, we'd have verified audio if the incident.
I don't get why this makes sense to you. We can easily see racist POVs here. I realize people don't see themselves as racist even when they are. I don't care if I post it or not and I'm certainly not glad to see it.Is it just me or are there people on this board who are a half step from peeing their pants in anticipation of getting to call someone a racist?
Parcells is not a doctor and is not credible. [snipped, been addressed
Purcells assisted Baden who had impeccable credentials, so your attempt to impeach the autopsy reports is a FAIL. You can't impeach an autopsy as not done by a qualified examiner because the assistant was not credentialed to do the autopsy alone.Exactly. He's not a doctor. I haven't read anywhere that Baden cast doubt on the "charging" account. He has instead maintained a neutral position on the matter.
The head wounds are what they are. No amount of hissy fitting here is going to change them.
And this is a big deal to you why?So the attorney of the guy who recorded the shots being fired -- while remarking what a small world it is -- comes to learn that one of her OTHER clients is related to Michael Brown, and this is somehow newsworthy because...?
Yeah, I see how people in the thread dismiss tangible evidence in favor of rumors and hearsay and twisted versions that try to make a desired outcome fit the evidence.Close relative, and it's dated the 15th.
And Brown was a recording artist, which indicates audio processing gear in the family.
See how this works?
Actually, I sure hope they didn't get fooled by someone, or worse.
I hope the recording is genuine, although I think they are mistaken about what it is a recording of...
