By the way, for someone with an orbital blowout fracture, Wilson looks uninjured in the video of his pacing around at the scene.
CNN showed a close up of Wilson pacing around at the crime scene.
It's Piaget Crenshaw's: Interview and video clip
I think this is a still of Wilson at the scene.
CNN zoomed in, identified Wilson, and he was seen pacing near the body in the clip.
Between the single less than credible source, the fact no mainstream news outlets have picked up the story, and the fact Wilson is at the crime scene in videos without any obvious serious facial injury I think it's time to call the orbital fracture claim a fraud.
Also, he doesn't have a nose...
I agree that the claim of fracture can't be evaluated as true with that single assertion. It's undetermined. Neither can that frame dispute them.
The claim fits with early police comments that he received facial injury and was treated at hospital. Also, the site in question is local -- these people often have well-vetted sources in place and lack pressure the national news cycle exerts.
At the end of the day, it will be Wilson's medical records that will confirm or dispute this claim. Since these fractures are diagnosed via imaging and the risks are such that if Wilson presented with symptoms the test was almost certainly performed, then the answer should be straightforward.
Wilson's claim doesn't rely on an orbital fracture. As reported, it relies of the initial altercation, the struggle for the firearm and any fist-strikes by Brown before turning to charge Wilson.