Quote:
Federal government response
President Bush signed a
$10.5 billion relief package within four days of the hurricane,
[7] and ordered 7,200 active-duty troops to assist with relief efforts.
[8] However, some members of the
United States Congress charged that the relief efforts were slow because most of the affected areas were poor.
[9] There was also concern that many National Guard units were short staffed in surrounding states because some units were deployed overseas and local recruiting efforts in schools and the community had been hampered making reserves less than ideal.
[10]
Due to the slow response to the hurricane, New Orleans's top emergency management official called the effort a "national disgrace" and questioned when reinforcements would actually reach the increasingly desperate city.
[11] New Orleans's emergency operations chief Terry Ebbert blamed the inadequate response on the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). "This is not a FEMA operation. I haven't seen a single FEMA guy", he said. "FEMA has been here three days, yet there is no command and control. We can send massive amounts of aid to tsunami victims, but we can't bail out the city of New Orleans."
[11]
In the early morning of September 2 mayor
Ray Nagin expressed his frustration at what he claimed were insufficient reinforcements provided by the President and federal authorities.
[12][13]
However, many police, fire and EMS organizations from outside the affected areas were reportedly hindered or otherwise slowed in their efforts to send help and assistance to the area. FEMA sent hundreds of firefighters who had volunteered to help rescue victims to Atlanta for 2 days of training classes on topics including sexual harassment and the history of FEMA.
[14]
Official requests for help through the proper chains of command were not forthcoming due to local and state delays in engaging FEMA for federal assistance, even after approached by such authorities. Local police and other EMS workers found the situation traumatic; at least two officers committed suicide, and over 300 deserted the city after gang violence and "turf wars" erupted around the city.
[15]
A report by the
Appleseed Foundation, a public policy network, found that local entities (nonprofit and local government agencies) were far more flexible and responsive than the federal government or national organizations. The federal response was often constrained by lack of legal authority or by ill-suited eligibility and application requirements. In many instances, federal staff and national organizations did not seem to have the flexibility, training, and resources to meet demands on the ground."
[16]
Did even you read, let alone understand, anything that I have written in this thread? I have demolished the very argument you are advancing at least three times in this very thread, and you have the chutzpah to offer it up again? I'm actually a little embarrassed for you. For the last time, there is a huge difference between overtopping and breaching. If the guy giving the presentation to Bush was worried about breaching, he would have said, "there's a chance of a breach." Instead, he said there was a chance of overtopping. Why do you think when an engineer says "overtop" he really means "breach," and why would you think Bush would know that?
