Michael Avenatti thread

The Big Dog said:
whatever you say.

next time one of your client gets lit up for 300k in attorney fees awarded to the other side you tell them that they are the real winners.

:thumbsup: WINNING
Click to expand...

TBD reminds me of Charlie Sheen with his 'winning' chant. Next he'll be telling us about tiger's blood. Trump was slaughtered by Avenatti. Maybe Avenatti crashes and burns along with Trump. If so, too bad for Avenatti. But he did a masterful job for half a year of pointing out what a lying mass of fecal matter Trump is.
 
acbytesla said:
TBD reminds me of Charlie Sheen with his 'winning' chant. Next he'll be telling us about tiger's blood. Trump was slaughtered by Avenatti. Maybe Avenatti crashes and burns along with Trump. If so, too bad for Avenatti. But he did a masterful job for half a year of pointing out what a lying mass of fecal matter Trump is.
Click to expand...

True, although in the case of Avnetti I would say "Takes one to know one".
 
My god... I was using winning ironically to refer to Avenatti's life crashing and burning.

Beyond amazed I have to explain this.
 
dudalb said:
True, although in the case of Avnetti I would say "Takes one to know one".
Click to expand...

As bad as Avenatti is and he doesn't look too good these days he's a better man than Trump was on Trump's best day. But Trump really is a POS. Despicable to the core.
 
The Big Dog said:
:confused:
Click to expand...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12377895&postcount=250

This thread was created so the original Stormy Daniels thread would not be over run with posts about Avenatti. It was never intended to be for a good discussion or any actual exchange of ideas. It is a bright shiny object to prevent crap from getting posted where meaningful discussion could still happen.

It has done a wonderful job of concentrating BS where it won't do any harm. It is the equivalent of somebody yelling "Look, a squirrel!" to their pet.
 
Wasn't this thread started in US pol, and then moved to current events? Now back in US pol?

Should be in humor.
 
Lambchops said:
Wasn't this thread started in US pol, and then moved to current events? Now back in US pol?

Should be in humor.
Click to expand...

If it ever got moved I missed it. But then again, it really does not matter where it is.
 
gregthehammer said:
Actually, I really could give 2 ***** about avenatti one way or the other. I gave him the benefit of the doubt when he first came on the scene with Stormy D, but as time went by, I am starting to find myself in agreement with BigDog that maybe the guy is thirsty for attention.
Click to expand...

To be fair...

People who know how to get media attention can do a lot when it comes to keeping power in check and bringing injustices to light - that was the entire point of the Birmingham march, among many other civil rights actions. The guy has no place in government, and the only point of any campaign would be to help push particular causes onto better candidates, but so far he's done more harm than good.
 
Last edited:
Mumbles said:
To be fair...

People who know how to get media attention can do a lot when it comes to keeping power in check and bringing injustices to light - that was the entire point of the Birmingham march, among many other civil rights actions. The guy has no place in government, and the only point of any campaign would be to help push particular causes onto better candidates, but so far he's done more harm than good.
Click to expand...

The only reason Stormy D or her lawyer are relevant is because Trump's personal life is a dumpster fire and some of his baggage followed him into office. It's not surprising that Trump's baggage is trashy. Trump is trashy. He seems to make habit of stepping out on his wife and paying for the silence of his affair partners. It pleases me that Avenatti and Stormy vex Trump, but that doesn't mean they are virtuous people, nor is it necessary for them to be virtuous. Seeing them all flame out spectacularly is the optimal result. Flush all these turds together.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
whatever you say.

next time one of your client gets lit up for 300k in attorney fees awarded to the other side you tell them that they are the real winners.

:thumbsup: WINNING
Click to expand...

You do know how much was raised in the GoFundMe campaign, right? Neither Stormy nor Mr. Avenatti are going to suffer in the least, financially.
 
Doubt said:
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=12377895&postcount=250

This thread was created so the original Stormy Daniels thread would not be over run with posts about Avenatti. It was never intended to be for a good discussion or any actual exchange of ideas. It is a bright shiny object to prevent crap from getting posted where meaningful discussion could still happen.

It has done a wonderful job of concentrating BS where it won't do any harm. It is the equivalent of somebody yelling "Look, a squirrel!" to their pet.
Click to expand...

How’s the stormy daniels thread going?

Lol
 
The Big Dog said:
How’s the stormy daniels thread going?

Lol
Click to expand...

There is no Stormy Daniels thread, because Stormy Daniels really does not matter. There is a Michael Avenatti thread though, even though he is does not matter either.

Now, why is there a Michael Avenatti thread, and not a Stormy Daniels thread? Because you, TBD, made it happen. Your obsession With Avenatti got you what you wanted.

Now, how about that Hillary, amirite? EMAILS!
 
Lambchops said:
There is no Stormy Daniels thread, because Stormy Daniels really does not matter. There is a Michael Avenatti thread though, even though he is does not matter either.

Now, why is there a Michael Avenatti thread, and not a Stormy Daniels thread? Because you, TBD, made it happen. Your obsession With Avenatti got you what you wanted.

Now, how about that Hillary, amirite? EMAILS!
Click to expand...

Huh

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=329130

Cool post tho, lol
 
The Big Dog said:
Looks at it again, it clearly does. Thanks for asking!

In other news from the world of incompetent attorney Mike Avenatti, not only is he violating the first rule of criminal defense: shut the **** up; he is threatening:



Incompetent bozo Mike Avenatti still does not know what anti-SLAPP is.
Click to expand...


Here is the original claim.


riginally Posted by Stacyhs I don't think you'll get much, if any, disagreement from anyone in this thread on that. I do have to admire his handling of the Stormy Daniels case, though. He made Trump look like a lying SOB. Hmmmm....but come to think of it, that's no all that difficult to do.
Click to expand...


:thumbsup: No amount of monetary compensation can make up for the ridicule Trump had to endure with that absurd contract being opened up for public scrutiny. "David Dennison" :D
 
a_unique_person said:
Here is the original claim.





:thumbsup: No amount of monetary compensation can make up for the ridicule Trump had to endure with that absurd contract being opened up for public scrutiny. "David Dennison" :D
Click to expand...

“I do admire his handling of the Stormy Daniels case.”

She could end up liable for as much as 500k in fees for Trump and Cohen.

Oops
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom