• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Michael Avenatti thread

The Big Dog said:
Yet, they are not disagreeing, they are certainly not posting any facts to contradict the lights out posts I have been posting.
Click to expand...

Disagreeing will not serve a useful purpose. You will not be convinced of anything other that what you already believe, so that would be pointless. None of the accusations have had any impact on his client or her case. They probably never will.

They say they don’t are, heck you started the thread and say you dont Care.
Click to expand...

I see you have not figured out why I started this thread. There are two reasons. One was a failed attempt at influencing someone else. The other was to be a shiny object to distract from off topic postings in another thread.


Curious when one demonstrates that the subject of the thread is beneath contempt that our correspondents claim they don’t care

Huh
Click to expand...

What you don't seem to grasp is that Avenatti's actions are not relevant to much of anything unless they impact his client's case. Add to that anything you can hit him with can easily just look at Trump's record and find an equivalent action. Maybe you could start another thread just to compare the two. Start a short list of one man's shortcomings and see what parallels we can find.
 
Doubt said:
Disagreeing will not serve a useful purpose. You will not be convinced of anything other that what you already believe, so that would be pointless. None of the accusations have had any impact on his client or her case. They probably never will.



I see you have not figured out why I started this thread. There are two reasons. One was a failed attempt at influencing someone else. The other was to be a shiny object to distract from off topic postings in another thread.




What you don't seem to grasp is that Avenatti's actions are not relevant to much of anything unless they impact his client's case. Add to that anything you can hit him with can easily just look at Trump's record and find an equivalent action. Maybe you could start another thread just to compare the two. Start a short list of one man's shortcomings and see what parallels we can find.
Click to expand...

Of course they have, he had to withdraw from the NY case because of his sleazy thirsty reputation, just to name one.

Further, as I have pointed out repeatedly, Thirsty is all sett to speak at the Democratic WingDing which is precursor to running for President, as such the claim "Avenatti's actions are not relevant to much of anything unless they impact his client's case" is spectacularly false.
 
Avenatti shows his true colors

Thirsty grifter, attention seeking scam artist, and one of the leading Candidates for the Democratic nomination, Michael Avenatti, shows his true colors with a misogynistic, body shaming attack on a critic

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1054020839509643264

absolute garbage, but what do you expect from a Rahm Emmanuel acolyte and contingent fee class action attorney.

Avenatti 2020!
 
The Big Dog said:
Thirsty grifter, attention seeking scam artist, and one of the leading Candidates for the Democratic nomination, Michael Avenatti, shows his true colors with a misogynistic, body shaming attack on a critic

https://twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti/status/1054020839509643264

absolute garbage, but what do you expect from a Rahm Emmanuel acolyte and contingent fee class action attorney.
Click to expand...
Let me get this straight...

Trump bases his presidential campaign and subsequent presidency on racism and misogyny, often making negative remarks about women and their appearances.

A far-right wingnut "journalist" Laura Loomer supports Trump (i.e. the man who called Daniel's "horse face", body-shamed a former Miss America winner over her weight, etc.)

Avanetti posts a pic which both focuses on her appearance and makes her look bad.

Why should Loomer be upset? She supports guys who criticize women's appearance. She should be flattered. "Hey, insulting appearances is what good people do".

Avanetti may or may not have been wrong to post the pic, but frankly, I think any complaints lodged against him by Loomer (or any Trump supporter) smacks of Hypocrisy.
 
Segnosaur said:
Let me get this straight...

Trump...
Click to expand...

Time to whataboutism and appeal to hypocrisy fallacy?

NEW RECORD!

"She should have been flattered." damn, that is some next level misogyny.

Whataboutism is a craven defense of egregiously terrible conduct like Avenatti's, and the above quoted post shows why such arguments are so terrible.
 
The Big Dog said:
Time to whataboutism and appeal to hypocrisy fallacy?
Click to expand...
Well, are Trump supporters (including the woman in particular) being hypocritical?

Perhaps you can point out one of the articles she has written where she has criticized Trump for insulting women's appearances.

"She should have been flattered." damn, that is some next level misogyny.

Whataboutism is a craven defense of egregiously terrible conduct like Avenatti's, and the above quoted post shows why such arguments are so terrible.
Click to expand...
Hey, she loves her some Trump. Trump insults women and fixates on their appearance. Why should we care if she got her feelings hurt when someone does the same to her?

Those in glass houses and all...
 
Segnosaur said:
Well, are Trump supporters (including the woman in particular) being hypocritical?
Click to expand...

say, there is that tu quoque! Again, because it must be literally impossible to actually address bad conduct from the left on its own terms.

Or at least without doubling down like the last misogynistic post

Tell us how the woman should have felt flattered about Mike Avenatti's abuse. maybe she was asking for it, huh?

tell us more about how she should feel flattered.

"She should have been flattered."

-Segnosaur
 
The Great Zaganza said:
Hypocrisy is a feature, not a bug of Republicans.
Click to expand...

Avenatti is not a Republican... but you were not going to actually address his misogynistic statement at all, now were you? Which makes your post more than a little hypocritical, now doesn't it?

protip: Yes, it does
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
say, there is that tu quoque! Again, because it must be literally impossible to actually address bad conduct from the left on its own terms.
Click to expand...
Still waiting to hear whether the women (and the rest of the Trumpkin supporters) are being hypocritical.

Simple yes or no answer would suffice. You can do that, can't you?

Look on your keyboard... . 2 or 3 characters. That's all you need.

Or at least without doubling down like the last misogynistic post
Click to expand...
Hey, I'm just following in Trump's footsteps. Insulting women=activity to be admired and respected.

tell us more about how she should feel flattered.

"She should have been flattered."
Click to expand...
Already explained it to you.

Trump is respected by the woman. Trump insults (other) women. Woman doesn't criticize him for it. Woman must think insulting women is something acceptable and/or to be admired.

Not really sure why you think that's such a complex argument.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
Hypocrisy is a feature, not a bug of Republicans.
Click to expand...
Avenatti is not a Republican...
Click to expand...
No, but Trump is. And so are many/most of his supporters (and even the ones who claim they aren't republicans are still supportive of the republican cause.)

So the hypocrisy is that a Trump supporter (one who likes a president who insults women) is complaining about someone insulting a woman.
 
Segnosaur said:
Still waiting to hear whether the women (and the rest of the Trumpkin supporters) are being hypocritical.
.
Click to expand...

NO. I answered your silly little fallacious red herring.

Avenatti is being hypocritical and misogynistic, his supporters are being hypocritical and misogynistic, your posts are next level hypocritical and misogynistic.

At least you admit it, which is good.

"She should have been flattered."

-Segnosaur
 
The Big Dog said:
Avenatti is not a Republican... but you were not going to actually address his misogynistic statement at all, now were you? Which makes your post more than a little hypocritical, now doesn't it?

protip: Yes, it does
Click to expand...

It is highly enjoyable to watch how much Avenatti infuriates Trump supporters.
Since he has no chance of getting anywhere with a nomination for 2020, I fully approve of you or others wasting their time and energy railing against him.

The real reason why you are so upset about Avenatti is that he is a mirror image of Trump - only younger and better looking.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
It is highly enjoyable to watch how much Avenatti infuriates Trump supporters.
Since he has no chance of getting anywhere with a nomination for 2020, I fully approve of you or others wasting their time and energy railing against him.

The real reason why you are so upset about Avenatti is that he is a mirror image of Trump - only younger and better looking.
Click to expand...

A snapping turtle is better looking than Trump.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom