• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Michael Avenatti thread

The Big Dog said:
No you have not explained it, you made it up and you have been continuing to assert one of the single most ridiculous arguments that I have ever seen.


To tell you how silly this argument is, Avenatti in his ex parte application repeatedly calls himself "defendant" and the other side "plaintiff."
Click to expand...
Avenatti describes himself as a defendant in the Bechard suit, which he apparently is. He is the plaintiff in the ex parte application because he initiated it.
The argument that a person can be a defendant in one legal action and a plaintiff in another one is not, on the face of it, ridiculous. On the contrary, it's an obvious fact.

Say, just for more giggles, what is Sarah Bechard in the ex parte application, hmmm?
Click to expand...
I don't think Bechard has any role in the application.

Say, folks get ready to post all the laughing dogs.

(Dream thread)
Click to expand...
Does anybody else have a problem with the idea that Avenatti can be a defendant in one legal action and a plaintiff in another? I think you're rather special in that regard.
 
Last edited:
CapelDodger said:
Avenatti describes himself as a defendant in the Bechard suit, which he apparently is. He is the plaintiff in the ex parte application because he initiated it.
The argument that a person can be a defendant in one legal action and a plaintiff in another one is not, on the face of it, ridiculous. On the contrary, it's an obvious fact.

I don't think Bechard has any role in the application.

Does anybody else have a problem with the idea that Avenatti can be a defendant in one legal action and a plaintiff in another? I think you're rather special in that regard.
Click to expand...

"He is the plaintiff in the ex parte application because he initiated it."

Lol, an ex parte application is simply a motion in a pending action on shortened notice. here, some law! http://www.courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=three&linkid=rule3_1204

"I don't think Bechard has any role in the application."

Bwhahaha! I am surprised the legal beagle eagles who populate this forum are letting you twist in the wind with this nonsense
 
Cohen was taken aback by Avenatti approaching him while eating.

Avenatti did not have permission to speak to Cohen.

Cohen’s lawyer said that Avenatti breached rule 2-100 and intends to bring Avenatti’s unethical conduct to the attention of the judge.

Man, Thirsty is a scumbag.

But you already knew that by reading my posts and explanations. God damn, tbd you are so *********** good.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/07/23/politics/avenatti-cohen-trump-meeting/index.html
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
Cohen was taken aback by Avenatti approaching him while eating.

Avenatti did not have permission to speak to Cohen.

Cohen’s lawyer said that Avenatti breached rule 2-100 and intends to bring Avenatti’s unethical conduct to the attention of the judge.

Man, Thirsty is a scumbag.

But you already knew that by reading my posts and explanations. God damn, tbd you are so *********** good.

https://amp.cnn.com/cnn/2018/07/23/politics/avenatti-cohen-trump-meeting/index.html
Click to expand...
I knew that from reading the news. He should obviously be held responsible for whatever wrongdoing he did. That's the law.


ETA: Reading back on it, no one even argued with it lol.
 
Last edited:
plague311 said:
I knew that from reading the news. He should obviously be held responsible for whatever wrongdoing he did. That's the law.


ETA: Reading back on it, no one even argued with it lol.
Click to expand...

That ISNT breaking the law. It might be a BAR violation at best. And unlikely to produce more than a scolding. Its more about protecting clients from poaching than anything else.
 
Sneering hypocrite Michael Avenatti is trying to get a federal judge in Orange County to bar the news media from covering his testimony this morning on his law firm’s bankruptcy.

#Basta! #Openthehearing!
 
The Big Dog said:
"He is the plaintiff in the ex parte application because he initiated it."

Lol, an ex parte application is simply a motion in a pending action on shortened notice. here, some law! http://www.courts.ca.gov/cms/rules/index.cfm?title=three&linkid=rule3_1204
Click to expand...
Which was a legal action, initiated by Avenatti, who was therefore the plaintiff.

"I don't think Bechard has any role in the application."

Bwhahaha! I am surprised the legal beagle eagles who populate this forum are letting you twist in the wind with this nonsense
Click to expand...
I think it was between Avenatti and the court, which sealed the Bechard case. Avenatti argued that the court was wrong in granting the seal : the court found otherwise.


You presumably have your understanding of the matter and Bechard's role in it. Feel free to share.
 
CapelDodger said:
Which was a legal action, initiated by Avenatti, who was therefore the plaintiff.

I think it was between Avenatti and the court, which sealed the Bechard case. Avenatti argued that the court was wrong in granting the seal : the court found otherwise.

You presumably have your understanding of the matter and Bechard's role in it. Feel free to share.
Click to expand...

No an ex parte application is a motion, but I enjoyed the fact that you ignored the rules of court I cited.

Bechard is the plaintiff who asked that her case be sealed. Thirsty is a defendant who filed a motion in the action in which she was the plaintiff and he was the defendant. Filing a motion does not make him a plaintiff, although I appreciate your dogged insistence in being totally wrong!
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
Sneering hypocrite Michael Avenatti is trying to get a federal judge in Orange County to bar the news media from covering his testimony this morning on his law firm’s bankruptcy.

#Basta! #Openthehearing!
Click to expand...

So?
 
Contemptible hypocrite Michael Avenatti who has been braying for months that all of his targets should "come clean" convinces a Federal Court judge to close the hearing in which he testified regarding his firm's bankruptcy.

"Michael Avenatti gets judge to bar media from his testimony on Newport Beach law firm's bankruptcy"

Frank has alleged that Eagan Avenatti cheated him out of millions of dollars in pay, a charge that Avenatti denies.

The firm has defaulted on more than $880,000 in federal payroll taxes, penalties and interest that Avenatti had promised to pay. The Internal Revenue Service asked Bauer to hold the firm in contempt of court, but set aside the request Wednesday after reaching a deal for payment, according to the U.S. attorney’s office in Los Angeles.

“Your honor, the payroll taxes need to be paid as soon as possible,” Assistant U.S. Atty. Najah Shariff told Bauer shortly before Avenatti began testifying behind closed doors in a courthouse conference room.
Click to expand...

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-avenatti-bankruptcy-20180725-story.html

the media has filed an emergency petition for access.

Avid readers, continue to subscribe here for the latest developments

#BASTAvenatti.
 
‘They want to embarrass me,’ Avenatti says in demanding media be barred from his testimony on his law firm’s bankruptcy.

Remember, this is the same shyster who released Cohen's stolen bank records.
 
Dr. Keith said:
Seeming less thirsty today than in the past. Shy or satiated?
Click to expand...

According to a court reporter in the courthouse, she saw Avenatti tweeting about getting to the bottom of Stormy's arrest right after his lawyers had just asked the court to kick out the media and seal his transcript.

What a maroon.
 
Last edited:
The Big Dog said:
According to a court reporter in the courthouse, she saw Avenatti tweeting about getting to the bottom of Stormy's arrest right after his lawyers had just asked the court to kick out the media and seal his transcript.

What a maroon.
Click to expand...
Having never tweeted, how does tweeting appear different that texting (for example)? Was the court reporter looking over his shoulder?
 
The Big Dog said:
According to a court reporter in the courthouse, she saw Avenatti tweeting about getting to the bottom of Stormy's arrest right after his lawyers had just asked the court to kick out the media and seal his transcript.

What a maroon.
Click to expand...

maroons make me mad thirsty.
 
Jungle Jim said:
To be fair to TBD, since this thread is entitled the "Michael Avenatti thread" any information about Mr. Avenatti is appropriate.
Click to expand...

It's not that I object to his post. It's that I am bored by it. Avenatti isn't POTUS. He isnt really accountable to the rest of us like a government official should be. That he wants to keep his affairs private and by that I mean 'legal' affairs, not the latest porn star he's banging is understandable.

TBD only is trying to shoot the messenger in his quest to smear Avenatti. I'm watching him make post after post about Avenatti questionable ethics quite amused since they pale in comparison to his hero. Does he really think we should care about Avenatti's bankruptcy? I am not one of his creditors. The day Avenatti leaves bus boys, waiters and small businesses holding the bag like Trump did multiple times, then I might care a little. Until then, yawn.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom