• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Michael Avenatti thread

The Big Dog said:
How do we know who is telling the truth?

Easy, the person who hired ambulance chasing non-attorney in Virginia Michael Avenatti is not.

by the way, they were both members of a country club, and now Avenatti's client is not.

Telling.

#IBelieveHer
Click to expand...
Thank you for the candid reply.
 
Didn't get the point, did you:
you suggested that being kick out of a Club supports the argument that he was lying.
You Sir, are a Snob.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
Didn't get the point, did you:
you suggested that being kick out of a Club supports the argument that he was lying.
Click to expand...

As detailed in the actual link provided the person who called the young woman a "******* ****" and a whore had his membership terminated following an investigation due to his grossly inappropriate conduct.

Shocked that people would actually defend this misogynistic bully, but I should know better than to expect anything less from the Left.
 
The Big Dog said:
As detailed in the actual link provided the person who called the young woman a "******* ****" and a whore had his membership terminated following an investigation due to his grossly inappropriate conduct.

Shocked that people would actually defend this misogynistic bully, but I should know better than to expect anything less from the Left.
Click to expand...

The Great Zaganza said:
i have no beef in this apart from hoping it goes on as long as possible for entertainment purposes..
Click to expand...

no beef with the misogynistic bully

check
 
By the way? A real problem for the unauthorized practice of law is that serial violators like Avenatti are not familiar with local laws. Here Thirsty claimed that "It likely includes underage drinking in violation of VA law." oops, people who are not yet 21 years old can drink in Virginia when they are with their parents.

Avenatti ain't just a grifter, he is totally incompetent
 
The Big Dog said:
By the way? A real problem for the unauthorized practice of law is that serial violators like Avenatti are not familiar with local laws. Here Thirsty claimed that "It likely includes underage drinking in violation of VA law." oops, people who are not yet 21 years old can drink in Virginia when they are with their parents.

Avenatti ain't just a grifter, he is totally incompetent
Click to expand...

Not a lawyer, but being able to drink under the supervision of her parents is not the same as being served at a licensed bar. That's probably still illegal, though the liability may be more on the bar.

My reading of the statute is that parents may provide alcohol to their children under 21 at their private residence. Doesn't seem to be any exemption for drinking in public or any exemption for a licensed bar to allow anyone under 21 to consume.

https://law.lis.virginia.gov/vacode/4.1-200/
 
Last edited:
varwoche said:
The guy denies Carlson's accusations. It says so in the article you cited. And he says there are witnessed who can attest.

I don't know who is telling the truth. How have you ascertained that it's Carlson telling the truth? Are there (non family member) witnesses?
Click to expand...

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1061484728652570624.html

One last point on the Tucker Carlson protest, you don't wanna believe the protestors, why not go with the police version of events?

Cause there is a police report.

I'm gonna say that's a more reliable source than Mr. Carlson.

And it completely contradicts him.

Here goes.
First, the police interacted w/ the protestors as they were leaving & they didn't arrest anyone.

They actually saw the person spray-paint the anarchist symbol on the driveway.

The protestors were walking away slowly. Two walked with canes (yes). No one tried to run.
BTW there were 4 legal observers at this protest. People going to someone's house to break in, don't usually take legal observers.
The police talked to the protestors about not having a problem w/ them exercising their first amendment rights but that spray-painting the driveway was crossing the line. That was the issue.
If the police had received a frantic 911 call from Mrs. Carlson saying she was terrified, had locked herself in her pantry & people were trying to break into her house, there is no way that the police would have let the protestors go. They would have made arrests.
They would have sent so many squad cars to that location if she represented what was happening in that way. Police tend to over-react. They didn't here. That tells me Mrs. Carlson did not call & say she was being terrorized.
In the police report, there is no mention whatsoever of any damage to the front door of Mr. Carlson's residence. Not a scratch. This is consistent w/ protestors' saying they simply knocked on the door and then left a placard resting on it before retreating to the street.
There is no mention in the police report of anyone chanting anything about pipe bombs or chanting any sort of threats against Mr. Carlson.
What the police appeared to be focused on was the spraying of the anarchist symbol on the driveway of the residence by one person. That was the extent of the property damage. That was the extent of the activity that could possibly be construed as unlawful.
Even when it was reported that the incident was being looked at as a hate crime, it appears that this was the focus of the investigation.
(How that could in any way be prosecuted as a hate crime is a subject for another day.)
What is of concern now is that, since there has been such misreporting to which unfortunately people on the left like @StephenAtHome have given credence, there will be political pressure to bring criminal charges for activity that is not criminal.
I hope those people will take the time to reconsider and correct their misstatements.

Oh, hey, let me add, I'm not one to point to the police as a credible source. I am a public defender, people. But they are a more credible source here than Tucker Carlson. I am also trying to beat the MAGA folks at their own game. Like, what, you don't believe law enforcement?
Click to expand...
 
"Cohen's lawyers argue that federal court should sanction both Michael Avenatti and Stormy Daniels for their defamation claim against him. A court has already tossed a defamation claim against President Trump, for which his lawyers are seeking sanctions."

They also tear him a new one for having the worst ten days a lawyer has had in a long, long time:

Enjoy!
 
err...
as evidence that Cohen has a legitimate claim against Avenatti for defaming him, you bring out the fact that Daniels plus lawyer didn't have a legitimate defamation claim against Trump?

all you are showing is how hard it is to make a defamation suit stick.
 
The Great Zaganza said:
err...
as evidence that Cohen has a legitimate claim against Avenatti for defaming him, you bring out the fact that Daniels plus lawyer didn't have a legitimate defamation claim against Trump?

all you are showing is how hard it is to make a defamation suit stick.
Click to expand...

no one is asserting that Cohen has a claim against Avenatti for defaming him, the claim is that Avenatti is subject to sanctions under the Anti-Slapp law, similar to how the claim against Trump was tossed and the judge told Trump to seek fees against Avenatti/Stormy
 
Vermont Democratic Party immediately cancels events planned with Michael Avenatti: “We have not heard from his people, but while there is some kind of arrest and investigation to ensue, we’re not going to step into that arena with him."
 
Different people have different approaches at different times. Here is mine for the next two and half years: WHEN THEY GO LOW, WE HIT HARDER. #Basta #FightClub

-M. Avenatti
 
Well that is awkward. Wikipedia says he was divorced in 2017. NBC just said they are estranged.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom