[Merged]Sizzler. Your theory please.

[Sizzler]

As for my hypothesis;

I attempted to demonstrate that a conspiracy theory for WTC event was at the very least possible. My rational has been posted earlier on in this thread. The main points were to deal with evidence that seems to suggest that a conspiracy isn't possible. Some issues were lack of detonation sounds, observed bowing, lack of CD devices, etc. As stated before I got stuck on the planes as I can come to no other logical conclusion than to concede that a CT would most definetely involve faked planes (rational previously posted). I'm still stuck there and I don't want to move on. CD CT is highly unlikey I must admit.

However I'm not satisfied accepting the official version of events (Commission Report that is and certain aspects of NIST). I'm left with a dirty taste in my mouth if I just accept that what we've been told is what happened. I cannot do it.

Thus I hope to be able to demonstrate that an open, transparent and independent investigation is needed. I haven't started this hypothesis but I have a few ideas that have been brewing.

So for those of you that have been waiting for so long, I will now concede that I think a CD CT is highly unlikely if not impossible. However I do believe that we still know very little about that day. As such I remain a sceptic but not a CD CT. I think the real conspiracy (not involving bombs) needs to be more fully uncovered. I hope to argue why in the future.

 

[Sizzler]

Until then, I do enjoy playing the devils advocate in certain situations. If I get outta line, and I probably will, just kindly remind me that I have now stated my current conclusions on CD CT.

And please don't forget that I remain sceptical of the official version of events but that doesn't automatically mean I promote CD or and inside job. I simply believe, at this moment, that there is much more out there to uncover (not including bombs).

 

[Sparky]

Thus I hope to be able to demonstrate that an open, transparent and independent investigation is needed. I haven't started this hypothesis but I have a few ideas that have been brewing.

Questions:

1. Who would you consider to be an acceptable organization to perform this new investigation?

2. What items do you feel were overlooked or not covered acceptably in the previous investigations?

3. Would you finally be satisfied if the new investigation reached the same conclusions as previous investigations?

 

[Sizzler]

Questions:

1. Who would you consider to be an acceptable organization to perform this new investigation?

2. What items do you feel were overlooked or not covered acceptably in the previous investigations?

3. Would you finally be satisfied if the new investigation reached the same conclusions as previous investigations?

These are some of the questions I'm considering in detail. I'll give you some quick answers off the top of my head.

1. It should be led by someone who is completely independent of the current administration (or past members) and does not have any affiliations (business or otherwise) to any key nations or corporations (S. Arabia for example). I also think family members should be part of the team.

2. There are lots but I'll just list a few: put options, S. Arabia connections, Pakistani connections, pre-911 Isreal intelligence information, Cheney/Rummy timelines, DOD response lies, response failures, etc, etc.

3. Yes.

 

[1337m4n]

I'm left with a dirty taste in my mouth if I just accept that what we've been told is what happened. I cannot do it.

I sure hope you do your own research instead of relying on Truther sites like PrisonPlanet and Loose Chumps.

 

[1337m4n]

So for those of you that have been waiting for so long, I will now concede that I think a CD CT is highly unlikely if not impossible.

It's hard to reconcile that with a belief that Silverstein lied.

Face it: The Dark Side is for you. Join us.

muahahahahahahahahahaaa

 

[Sizzler]

It's hard to reconcile that with a belief that Silverstein lied.

Face it: The Dark Side is for you. Join us.

muahahahahahahahahahaaa

Yes. Perhaps LS is just a frickin moron!!

 

[Quad4_72]

Yes. Perhaps LS is just a frickin moron!!

I don't think he is a moron at all. I think the people who actually thought that he was talking about CD are morons.

 

[Sparky]

I also think family members should be part of the team.

Don't you think that the "family members" should also hold other qualifications to adequately process the information?

I have members of my own family that I don't even trust to feed themselves.

 

[Sizzler]

Don't you think that the "family members" should also hold other qualifications to adequately process the information?

I have members of my own family that I don't even trust to feed themselves.

They wouldn't necessarily be investigating. Rather they could oversee the process and make sure certain questions were asked to certain people. They'd be kind of a quality control panel or something along those lines. And, certainly not all family members would just get a free pass to join the investigation team.

 

[Billdave2]

These are some of the questions I'm considering in detail. I'll give you some quick answers off the top of my head.

1. It should be led by someone who is completely independent of the current administration (or past members) and does not have any affiliations (business or otherwise) to any key nations or corporations (S. Arabia for example). I also think family members should be part of the team.

2. There are lots but I'll just list a few: put options, S. Arabia connections, Pakistani connections, pre-911 Isreal intelligence information, Cheney/Rummy timelines, DOD response lies, response failures, etc, etc.

3. Yes.

You realize that you have just eliminated everybody in the whole world don't you. This beats six degrees of Kevin Bacon by mile

 

[Sparky]

1. It should be led by someone who is completely independent of the current administration (or past members) and does not have any affiliations (business or otherwise) to any key nations or corporations (S. Arabia for example). I also think family members should be part of the team.

Since you've eliminated all past or present members of the U.S. Federal, State, County and Municipal governments, who decides the members of the panel? Can I sit on the panel due to my 30 years of experience with Fire/Life Safety systems? I think it would be a desired qualification and I am in no way affiliated with any government agency. Or am I automatically disqualified since I'm an American and a JREF member?

 

[Unsecured Coins]

Or am I automatically disqualified since I'm an American and a JREF member?

That alone gets you automatically shot in the head and your corpse beaten with sticks

 

[Sizzler]

Since you've eliminated all past or present members of the U.S. Federal, State, County and Municipal governments, who decides the members of the panel? Can I sit on the panel due to my 30 years of experience with Fire/Life Safety systems? I think it would be a desired qualification and I am in no way affiliated with any government agency. Or am I automatically disqualified since I'm an American and a JREF member?

Didn't you know JREFers will be sent to Gitmo if a new investigation happens. Sorry bud. hehe.

 

[Myriad]

Didn't you know JREFers will be sent to Gitmo if a new investigation happens. Sorry bud. hehe.

The joke's on you! Do you really think that after the revolution, the kangaroo court will bother to read through a bunch of old posts to figure out who posted on which side? Much easer (and safer) to just convict 'em all!

But don't worry, we'll be sure to tell the hangin' judge that you're not really one of us. Of course, anything we say will be considered a lie...

Respectfully,
Myriad

 

[tsig]

Didn't you know JREFers will be sent to Gitmo if a new investigation happens. Sorry bud. hehe.

We are staffing Gitmo Just what part of "evil world wide conspiracy" don't you get. We know where you live.

 

[Dave Rogers]

Didn't you know JREFers will be sent to Gitmo if a new investigation happens. Sorry bud. hehe.

Along with all the disinfo agents who happened to support a different version of Teh Truth than the one the new investigation ends up with. Good odds you'll be joining us - see you there.

Dave