[Merged]Sizzler. Your theory please.

Sizzler said:
Following this reason of thought, I am still stuck on the planes. There is simply no reliable evidence (that I am aware of) that suggests any conspiracy of plane tampering (drones, remote control, etc, etc).
Click to expand...

Are you stuck on CD, too? Because there is no reliable evidence that explosives and/or therm*te were in any of the buildings.

By this logic (and I'm glad to see you using it), you must be stuck on the Pentagon, because there is no reliable evidence that anything other than AA Flight 77 hit it. You must also be stuck on Shanksville, because there is no reliable evidence that anything other than UAL Flight 93 crashed there.

Is this your coming out party? If so I'd like to be the first to welcome you with open arms. Enjoy your stay in reality, Sizzler. We're glad to have you :).
 
Bump. Come on Sizzler. How long shall we be kept in suspense? ;)
 
I think Sizzler might've hung up his troothboots. I'm eagerly awaiting confirmation from him.
 
cisco said:
I think Sizzler might've hung up his troothboots. I'm eagerly awaiting confirmation from him.
Click to expand...

Yeah sorry guys. I don't have much spare time these days. Making a move back to N.A. and applying to Grad schools.

I might ditch the probability of conspiracy hypothesis because I can't rationally accept that the planes were tampered with. Also there is no evidence that suggests such possibility. I think I hit a dead end with the planes, and I can't ignore that a conspiracy of this magnitude would most certainly need the planes to be tampered with.

I will be writing a hypothesis nonetheless. However my goals may need to shift.

Stay tuned.
 
Sizzler said:
Yeah sorry guys. I don't have much spare time these days. Making a move back to N.A. and applying to Grad schools.

I might ditch the probability of conspiracy hypothesis because I can't rationally accept that the planes were tampered with. Also there is no evidence that suggests such possibility. I think I hit a dead end with the planes, and I can't ignore that a conspiracy of this magnitude would most certainly need the planes to be tampered with.

I will be writing a hypothesis nonetheless. However my goals may need to shift.

Stay tuned.
Click to expand...

Will do Sizzler. Am interested in hearing what you come up with.
 
I made a thread some time ago at your request to discuss your theory on the collapse of WTC7. You eventually delayed the unveiling of your theory for a later date. In that thread you had predicted you would have it finished in about one days time. You said it was not ready. It has since been a couple weeks.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I have not seen a thread where you give your explanation as to what you think made WTC7 collapse (if you have done so simply link me to it). If not, I think it is time for you to give your explanation on WTC7 and stop asking questions. You have had plenty of time. The floor is yours.
 
Thanks for the concern. But you really could have just posted this in the same thread. This is a duplicate now. If you are truly concerned, lets keep everything in that one because it will keep things in context.

Thanks.
 
Sizzler said:
Thanks for the concern. But you really could have just posted this in the same thread. This is a duplicate now. If you are truly concerned, lets keep everything in that one because it will keep things in context.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

does that complete non-answer translate as:
"I don't have one, I lied to you about making a hypothesis, and am afraid of committing myself?"
Or are you running for office somewhere?:D
 
Once again, let's be fair -- nobody from the Truth Movement, and I do mean nobody, has yet been able to come up with a reasonable alternate hypothesis. Ever.

I doubt Sizzler will be able to do the same. In the other thread, he even admitted his difficulties in doing so, and I applaud him for his candor.

Having said that, if as it now appears he cannot come up with an alternate hypothesis, it's time for him to think about what that means.
 
R.Mackey said:
Once again, let's be fair -- nobody from the Truth Movement, and I do mean nobody, has yet been able to come up with a reasonable alternate hypothesis. Ever.

I doubt Sizzler will be able to do the same. In the other thread, he even admitted his difficulties in doing so, and I applaud him for his candor.

Having said that, if as it now appears he cannot come up with an alternate hypothesis, it's time for him to think about what that means.
Click to expand...
I absolutely agree.
But the thing is, we've asked him to come up with ANY hypothesis that he can call his own.
I guess that his hypothesis is "asking the same questions that have been answered innumerable times in the past 6 years is enough for anybody"?
 
R.Mackey said:
Once again, let's be fair -- nobody from the Truth Movement, and I do mean nobody, has yet been able to come up with a reasonable alternate hypothesis. Ever.

I doubt Sizzler will be able to do the same. In the other thread, he even admitted his difficulties in doing so, and I applaud him for his candor.

Having said that, if as it now appears he cannot come up with an alternate hypothesis, it's time for him to think about what that means.
Click to expand...

Sizzler is about to switch teams. IMHO, judging from the manner in which Sizzler chooses his words and constructs his arguments, he absolutely hates the reality that he is currently holding an opinion that is not rationally supported by the evidence.

Come to the dark side Sizz. NWO pays great and gives out free pie in the cafeteria on Thursdays.
 
Some people are so entrenched in woo that they never will hold a rational thought. That covers the VAST majority of the truth (bowel) movement. That definitely covers the truthers that post here.
 
Sizzler said:
Thanks for the concern. But you really could have just posted this in the same thread. This is a duplicate now. If you are truly concerned, lets keep everything in that one because it will keep things in context.

Thanks.
Click to expand...

Sizzler. You know very well that it is completely irrelevant which thread your hypothesis is posted in. Your attempt to dodge my question has been noted. Now, if you would kindly grace us with your theory it would be greatly appreciated. You have had PLENTY of time to come up with one.

If I had no knowledge on the subject, I could read through all of the evidence in a day and come up with an informed theory. Time is up. Please present your view of what happened to WTC7. If you cannot, then simply state that you were lying when you said that you were working on a hypothesis and that it was almost ready.
 
I have also just noticed that the old thread was bumped. So Sizzler feel free to post your theory in this thread OR the other one. Its up to you. Mods if you want go ahead and merge these two threads as well, just for Sizzler.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom