[Merged]Scott Forbes powerdown revisited

Dog Town

Banned
Joined
Aug 3, 2006
Messages
6,862
Ct'ers throw this around, way to much, for me to buy it. I noticed Human brought it up again, on another thread here. I have found no real evidence to support it. Scott Forbes, seems to be the only source of this claim. No proof of his existence, other than a K Clown interview. I think we all know what color flag that raises. Just seems like there would be plenty of people, affected by such an inconvenience. Would love to find out for sure, so we can check one more off the ever growing list. Anyone?

Thanx for any input.

DT
 
Last edited:
what i know about forbes and the power-down he mentions:

hes a DCO (datacenter operations) technician for some company that was based at the WTC

his company had a server cluster at the WTC

the powerdowns lasted 36 hours

they were for the top 50 floors of tower 2



now, i have a similar job to forbes (DCO specialist) and my company has server clusters in illinois and in texas, knowing that, i can assure you that someone was in their offices monitoring the servers throughout the entire 36 hour operation, im sure other companies would have similar interests they would want to keep track of during any power down, so this was not an opportunity to plant explosives
 
Is he really the only one who remembers the powerdown? I thought there were more people who confirmed the story...
 
Is he really the only one who remembers the powerdown? I thought there were more people who confirmed the story...
I don't know of others who have confirmed it on video like Forbes has, but then again I have no idea what the fuss is about. The powerdown, however extensive it was or however long it lasted, was for one half of one building. The work was completed successfully: the computers worked that Monday. The CTs have not shown a single piece of evidence that anything suspicious happened. Have they spoken to the Port Authority? Do they know the company or companies involved in the project? If so, have the CTs investigated? No, of course not. Just more B.S.
 
Mhmm, maybe a point we have to debunk since they use this argument over and over. Even in most CT-movies i´ve seen so far.

Added:

Scott Forbes is the only source of the powerdown information; thousands of people would've been ticked off by this inconvenience and known and talked about it. This is a really silly story; security wouldn't have been turned off. There were definitely no such powerdowns at WTC 7 and WTC 1. 36 hours is inadequate for a controlled demolition; it took 24 days for a 33-level building, and it took at least 4 months for another 30-story office building to be set up with charges. It is also very doubtful that such a power-down would be necessary for a mere cable upgrade.

SOURCE:
http://nyctohylophobia.blogspot.com/2006/06/wtc-powerdown-story.html
 
Last edited:
Don't get me wrong! I in no way believe it would provide a cover. I don't buy it at all, in their fantasy. I was just curious, if it even really occurred at all. Not sure if I buy, this Scott Forbes. Seems like the "troofers" would come up with alot more"witnesses", if they were avail. Just strikes me as odd.
 
Nope - can´t find any valid source for further information beside the Scott Forbes story... :boggled:
 
There are no corroborating accounts. The Scott Forbes story is what it is - which isn't much.

In a subsequent "interview", he didn't substantiate the original CT story, he admitted that he didn't know anything about floors other than the few floors that were occupied by the company he worked for (there goes the "50 stories" claim); he had absolutely no basis except for his own (misinformed) speculation about what it actually meant to have a "power down" - i.e. the nonsense about security cameras and locks being inoperable is BS; he had no way of knowing anything about most of the things the CTers think his story "proved"; the timing changed from all weekend to 26 hours; he could not provide any details whatsoever about the alleged email he read about the alleged "power down", not a name of who it was from or even the department or group that it allegedly came from; he couldn't provide any description of the people he purportedly saw in the building that were somehow "suspicious"; he didn't provide a single name as a potential corroborating source even though he says "lots of people" knew about it and could/would corroborate his story.

Basically, his subsequent "interview", assuming it's legitimate although I'm not convinced yet that it is, is far less damning than the initial report attributed to him by CTers, but it is still far from satisfactory and it is still far from proof of anything since he gives no details that matter, offers no descriptions, wasn't in a position to know most of the things CTers claim his statement proves, wasn't in a position to observe most of the things CTers claim his statement proves, doesn't say where he was located in comparison to the mystery workers, (and come on, if they were planting explosives, they weren't doing it in the occupied office space - duh - so how and where did he see these mystery people while he was, supposedly, working away in his office? Etc.

The whole thing smacks of conspiranoid nonsense.

And there are zero, zilch, zip, nada, reports of any such "powerdown" in the other tower, by the way. Not a one. Same for WTC7.

Moreover, had the World Trade Center actually been effectively shut down for the weekend, or even for a day, it would have been big news, because the towers never shut down entirely. Never. Yet nary a peep about such an unprecedented and unheard of event was ever noted or reported upon? Sure.
 
Last edited:
BTW, the top 50 floors of tower 2 would include the observation deck, which wouldn't be closed on a weekend (assuming the 36 hours in question was over a weekend, like every other power down I've ever taken part in has been) for any reason.


They didn't even close it for bad weather. You just couldn't go outside and see anything.
 
By coincidence I was just reading a little about the 36/26 hour powerdown. I was wondering if any of our New York posters noticed something unusual that Saturday night? Something subtle, like...

361745320bdf23e96.jpg

 
Between 12 noon on Saturday and 2pm on Sunday, the weekend before the 11th.

I have no time to check right now (gotta go to work) but when was that shot in the Naudet's film made, where Tony and the other firefighter are ontop of that fireengine platform, with the towers in the background?
 
I have no time to check right now (gotta go to work) but when was that shot in the Naudet's film made, where Tony and the other firefighter are ontop of that fireengine platform, with the towers in the background?

Ooh, is that a clue you're getting?
 
Between 12 noon on Saturday and 2pm on Sunday, the weekend before the 11th.


Well, since my brother in law took his 2 kids to the observation deck that Sunsay morning, I'll ask him if they walked the last 50 flights of stairs. I don't remember them mentioning that; it would have gotten my attention.
 
I have no time to check right now (gotta go to work) but when was that shot in the Naudet's film made, where Tony and the other firefighter are ontop of that fireengine platform, with the towers in the background?

Turns out that was Sept 3rd. Good idea though.
 
Well, since my brother in law took his 2 kids to the observation deck that Sunsay morning, I'll ask him if they walked the last 50 flights of stairs. I don't remember them mentioning that; it would have gotten my attention.

Yeah, you'd think he would remember a little detail like that, wouldn't you?

:D
 
Well, since my brother in law took his 2 kids to the observation deck that Sunsay morning, I'll ask him if they walked the last 50 flights of stairs. I don't remember them mentioning that; it would have gotten my attention.

This is exactly what I am talking about. I don't think it happened at all! I would love to tell them to shove it about this nonsense.They always bring it up , like it is some stupid smoking gun! While we all know, even if it happened, it would not provide the cover they think. Interesting about your Bro/inlaw!
The plot thickens.
 
This is exactly what I am talking about. I don't think it happened at all! I would love to tell them to shove it about this nonsense.They always bring it up , like it is some stupid smoking gun! While we all know, even if it happened, it would not provide the cover they think. Interesting about your Bro/inlaw!
The plot thickens.

I don't think it happened at all either. Certainly not the way Forbes describes it. There were 26,000 visitors daily to the observation deck. You'd think that if all those people were walking up 50 stories that Saturday and Sunday, someone would have mentioned it over the past five years.
 

Back
Top Bottom