• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

[Merged]Me and Mr. Jones

Swing Dangler said:
I'm not aware of any. Then again, I'm not Alex Jones and it is hard to say if he has spoken to folks who have told him that or where he got that information from.
Click to expand...

My bet is the he got his info from his usual source: his arse.

Huh?:confused:
Click to expand...

My bad. Craig Bartmer is indeed another John Schroeder - a man with PTSD whose testimony is contradicted by the FDNY. But let's take his word, shall we?

The interview I saw with Bartmer was just him repeating talking points from LC, put options and all. No wonder twoofers usually don't talk about him anymore.

As for Indira Singh, isn't she the one who implicates the FDNY?
 
Last edited:
CHF said:
My bet is the he got his info from his usual source: his arse.



My bad. Craig Bartmer is indeed another John Schroeder - a man with PTSD whose testimony is contradicted by the FDNY. But let's take his word, shall we?

The interview I saw with Bartmer was just him repeating talking points from LC, put options and all. No wonder twoofers usually don't talk about him anymore.

As for Indira Singh, isn't she the one who implicates the FDNY?
Click to expand...

I'm not sure why you guys state she or anyone else implicated the FDNY.

After all, fire departments don't implode buildings, do they?

Based upon that line of logic, everyone who described explosions etc. would be implicating the FDNY, much like the guys in the video I posted to below.

Indira thought the building was being brought down because of its instability.


Sorry, CHF, I better not continue this discussion. I've been asked to keep it on topic despite other's doing the opposite. Cheers!
 
I didn't notice it on the way through to the end of the thread.

But yes - everybody - please keep this thread on topic, and use the other threads that already discuss the details of 911 for those topics.
 
Something about WTC7 that is seldom pointed out, and that I was a bit disappointed Ron didn't raise in the radio show...

WTC7 suffered significantly more damage (both in real terms and relative to structure size) and had significantly larger fires than either of the WTC towers. The reality is that WTC7 is the largest single building fire ever in history, and that on top of some of the most severe structural damage in history.

It's important not to dismiss the scale of the damage and fire in WTC7. Even in real terms they were larger than the WTC towers, let alone comparative to the overall size of the structure.
 
Edmund Standing said:
I went looking on Jones' sites but no report yet of his crushing victory over the leading neo-con shill and Zionist Illuminist known to us as Ron.
Click to expand...

Jones may be silent but the flying monkeys are chattering away on the version I uploaded to Google Video.

GetSumGoAgain
4 hours

Total propaganda. Alex's feed is made to sound terrible so he's hard to listen to. He is cut off, interrupted and muted while Weick is not. Richard bacon is a [rule10].Zlaya

14 hours ago

This was horrible. Ron Wieck outright lied the whole time. how can anyone be allowed on the air and just lie like that? WTF??? Plus the guy looks and sounds like a child molester 'debunker'?? LMAO!Zlaya

14 hours ago

Ron Wick, aka Poopmeroo is a sidestepping, bush supporting, lying piece of anti american trash, who should be brought in front a jury and tried for his lies. the man is a sleaseball, just listen to him. sounds and looks like someone who sniffs children's underware. 'well known debunker' No one knows who the [rule 10] Poopmeroo is, except a couple of sad lonely guys at JREF forums. pathetic 'debunking' just pathetic.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2885662174366086348
Click to expand...
 
Had a chance to listen to the mp3. Nice job Ron. Jones came across as a lying amped up meth addict. Throwing URLs out there like a porn pop up puppet. Straw dangler if you have a problem with the post content hit the report button or bring up your issues in the moderation forum.
 
The Mysterious Mr Wick: BBC Show Engages In Chaotic, Rambling 9/11 Truth Debunk-Fest



...a strange new debunker was introduced as "Ronald Wick".

Mr Wick was introduced as a broadcaster in New York and "a well known 9/11 conspiracy theory debunker", yet having written about the 9/11 truth movement and the attacks for over six years, I have never heard of the man, neither has Prisonplanet editor Paul Watson and neither has Alex Jones. Furthermore, a Google search produces no related results. Seemingly then "Ronald Wick" is either not a "very well known"
​
http://infowars.net/articles/april2008/300408BBC.htm

Note that the link to the alleged "Full Debate" in fact takes us to a Prison Planet URL and I have to assume they have edited it for content.

Does anyone have a BBC link?

Infowars.net - Printer Friendly / Low Graphics Page
BBC Show Engages In Chaotic, Rambling 9/11 Truth Debunk-Fest
Alex Jones faded out of uninformed "debate" whenever he raised salient points

Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
A Popular BBC talk radio show yesterday engaged in 45 minutes of uninformed debunking and ridicule of "9/11 conspiracy theories", interspersing questions over the official government version of events on 9/11 with barely intelligible members of the public talking about fake moon landings and Joan of Arc not actually being burned at the stake.

Alex Jones was invited onto the Richard Bacon show on BBC Radio Five Live, the BBC's talk radio station, but could barely get a word in edgewise before being faded out of the discussion and countered by a series of debunkers, two of whom frequently admitted to knowing very little about what was being discussed.

Edited by chillzero: 
Snipped for Rule 4
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Their own trio of pets, the Loose Change guys, were on the show with Ronald. If don't they even know that, how can they call themselves informed individuals?

This blog post from Infowars just demonstrates their lack of research skills.
 
Last edited:
I like the way that they put “Wick” in quotation marks. Even a stopped clock…
 
DGM said:
Yeah right. Prison planet has never covered "hardfire" "hit pieces".:boggled:
Click to expand...
if a typo can throw the crack investigative journalists of infowars.com for this big of a loop its a wonder anyone thinks they can find the truth about 9/11
 
If I wanted to make someone seem obscure and prevent anyone from using google and maybe finding HardFire, misspelling his name would do it.
 
The usual distortions of things like the NASA images and "evaporated" steel. What deceptive frauds they are.
 
How ironic. The people at infowars don't know who Ronald Wieck is, and Ronald Wieck doesn't even know what is on his own television show.
 
tanabear said:
How ironic. The people at infowars don't know who Ronald Wieck is, and Ronald Wieck doesn't even know what is on his own television show.
Click to expand...

I am sorry, but the only way that I will believe you is if you clone Ron Wieck in a vat of amino acids and replicate exactly his TV shows using Clone Wieck and androids, and test the clone Wieck to see if he knows what was shown on each program. "That is after all an experiment that can be replicated."

/only equally as crazy as Tanabear's suggestion that we crash airliners into 110 story buildings as an experiment.
 
BigAl said:

...a strange new debunker was introduced as "Ronald Wick".

Mr Wick was introduced as a broadcaster in New York and "a well known 9/11 conspiracy theory debunker", yet having written about the 9/11 truth movement and the attacks for over six years, I have never heard of the man, neither has Prisonplanet editor Paul Watson and neither has Alex Jones. Furthermore, a Google search produces no related results. Seemingly then "Ronald Wick" is either not a "very well known"
​


http://infowars.net/articles/april2008/300408BBC.htm

Note that the link to the alleged "Full Debate" in fact takes us to a Prison Planet URL and I have to assume they have edited it for content.

Does anyone have a BBC link?
Click to expand...


Here's the part with Ron (16min. unedited) The entire show was not about CTs and Jones got more time than Ron.

Google Video This video is not hosted by the ISF, the ISF can not be held responsible for the suitability or legality of this material. By clicking the link below you agree to view content from an external website.
I AGREE


AJ was muted because he kept plugging his videos and website and wouldn't shut up. Ron made his points calmly and without interrupting anyone. The host got a headache from AJ's shouting and had to take a pill.

Mods: Shouldn't this thread be merged here?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom