• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

[Merged]architects and engineers for 9/11 truth = SCAM!

Actually, AE911's Mickey Mouse standards of membership is indeed THEIR problem.

It's also THEIR problem if they decide to leave fake names on their highly-touted list.

How about answering this simple question, JH: why do you think AE911 continues to include those fake names on their list of "experts" despite being told they were fooled?


Probably to wind up the sad trolls who faked them. That is what I would do.
 
It appears that this thread has become relevant, what with the tangential discussion in this thread. Perhaps those involved would like to step over here to continue wrangling?
 
Probably to wind up the sad trolls who faked them. That is what I would do.

So you'd compromise the integrity of your organization by leaving FAKE names on your list of "experts," in the hope that this would somehow "wind up" the people who claim your organization is a joke?

You haven't posted anything that stupid since...well...earlier this afternoon.

:dl:
 
Perhaps we are one step closer to understanding why AE911 still lists fake names as being among their "experts" despite being told what happened.

In this thread, the always clueless JHarrow was pretty pissed to learn that JREF members had infiltrated AE911 with considerable ease.

Faking engineers on AE911 was criminally vandalizing his website.

Of course this was a rather pathetic effort at deflecting attention away from the real issue here: AE911 was shown to have NO standards whatsoever for membership and has apparently decided to leave those fake names on site.

This begs the obvious question:
CHF said:
why do you think AE911 continues to include those fake names on their list of "experts" despite being told they were fooled?

Could this be why?
JHarrow said:
Probably to wind up the sad trolls who faked them. That is what I would do.

Yup, he would compromise the integrity of his "expert" organization by leaving FAKE names on his list in the hope that this would somehow "wind up" the people who claim the organization is a joke.

:dl:
 
I split out some posts that I meant to move earlier but was taken offline for a bit. Be more civil please, and stop personalising the thread.

And stop the sock puppet accusations (and stop reporting them - they aren't a breach of the MA, but the resulting bickering is).
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: chillzero
 
I know this is a management question, but just quickly, are you now saying that "sock puppetry" is not against the MA?

If so, then on what basis do we ban sock puppets?

Or am I misreading your words there?

TAM:)
 
I know this is a management question, but just quickly, are you now saying that "sock puppetry" is not against the MA?

If so, then on what basis do we ban sock puppets?

Or am I misreading your words there?

TAM:)

You misread it, or I worded it poorly.
Calling someone asock puppet is not against the MA, so people shouldn't report people for calling them that.
 
Yup, he would compromise the integrity of his "expert" organization by leaving FAKE names on his list in the hope that this would somehow "wind up" the people who claim the organization is a joke.

Exactly. THIS is the 'truth' movement in a nutshell. It has nothing to do with truth, and everything to do with rhetorical brownie points and ideological statements.

Towards those goals ANYTHING is permissible, it appears.

As long as there are people like JH who appear to fall for their spiel hook, line, and sinker we need to expose these charlatans for who they really are.
 
Since JHarrow is so convinced we are criminals, maybe he can file a police report.

Then we'll watch as he gets laughed out of the precinct.




JHARROW: "Police! Some guys on the internet put their names down on some website for engineers that doesn't actually require you to be an engineer to put your name down!"

SHERRIFF: "Could someone file a missing child report?"
 
Last edited:
Since JHarrow is so convinced we are criminals, maybe he can file a police report.

Then we'll watch as he gets laughed out of the precinct.




JHARROW: "Police! Some guys on the internet put their names down on some website for engineers that doesn't actually require you to be an engineer to put your name down!"

SHERRIFF: "Could someone file a missing child report?"
I think it would end up:
SHERIFF; Here I have a jacket for you.

J; My hands don't stick out of the sleeves.

SHERIFF; Don't worry I'll tie them for you.
 
Are you condoning the impersonation of engineers?
These groups, the 9/11 groups are formed up based on lies. Some of the people signed up are real people, and really architects but they have no idea they were signed up! They were googled and signed up! Your 9/11 truth movement is a fraud! No evidence, no idea what happen on 9/11, and the members are clueless when it comes to knowledge on 9/11.

9/11 truth is open loop crazy ideas and a big fraud. You are now complaining because 9/11 truth is unable to authenticate it's own members! Talk about incompetent.
Gage does not care about his membership, he is selling lies, he does not care about truth. Gage is selling fraud! Rational people can see that.
 
Last edited:
And where is the proof that the people here who claim to be engineers are actually engineers?
 
And where is the proof that the people here who claim to be engineers are actually engineers?

Hey, I know! Maybe you should ASK someone for proof of their credentials if you doubt them.

In other words, the opposite of how AE911 "screens" their "experts."
 
Last edited:
And where is the proof that the people here who claim to be engineers are actually engineers?

R.Mackey has published his credentials all over the place. Google "Ryan Mackey". He's not exactly trying to be anonymous.

And try actually reading some of the technical posts from Newton's Bit, rwguinn, and Apollo20. These guys obviously know what they're doing. In contrast, look at Heiwa's posts and compare.

I have no doubt that those people who claim they are engineers here are actually engineers. Except possibly Heiwa.
 
Don't forget The Almond in your list there. Also, Apollo20 would probably take umbrage at being included with the engineers as he is a scientist with a doctor's degree in chemistry. (and a bit of a disdain for engineers it seems) (list)
 
I am "Cameron Porter PHD" (named after the Brady Bunch kids two doctors) The name was created to see how effective their screening processes was when their site was created. Doug Plumb contacted me on at least two occasions, even leaving me his cell phone number. I responded to him twice telling him to REMOVE the name. I explained to him that I did not find any substance to their website and the claims that it contained.

This was back in November and December of 07.

Gage is a joke. His claims are copy cat crap, and his is feeding off the idiots of the truth movement.
 
And where is the proof that the people here who claim to be engineers are actually engineers?
I'm willing to send a scan of my diploma to a moderator if you wish.

I don't consider myself a real engineering "player" in this sub-forum, however I have made the claim and I'm willing to back it up.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom