[Merged]architects and engineers for 9/11 truth = SCAM!

He just admitted that skeptics here pretended to be engineers to "test" AE911truths system.



Yawn. You may have suspected that some of us are adults. We get the idea that rationalists exposed the bogus nature of Gage's list by showing that anyone could get his name placed on it. You are conceding that no rationalist has been guilty of emulating the twoofers who pretend to be engineers, scientists, and demolition experts, correct?
 
I think, it is such a shame that a ... guy like gage seemed to collect "experts" to post on his site without making sure if they are "experts" ore even real people at all.

btw: thank you for the answer. I take this for a "yes".
 
I think, it is such a shame that a ... guy like gage seemed to collect "experts" to post on his site without making sure if they are "experts" ore even real people at all.

btw: thank you for the answer. I take this for a "yes".

If you leave your door unlocked and get robbed, does that mistake absolve the robber of his crimes?
 
If you leave your door unlocked and get robbed, does that mistake absolve the robber of his crimes?

You're comparing a criminal act to those who are merely running an exercise to show that Gage isn't remotely as diligent about checking his expert list as he bragged he was going to be?

Typical.
 
You're comparing a criminal act to those who are merely running an exercise to show that Gage isn't remotely as diligent about checking his expert list as he bragged he was going to be?

Typical.


You weren't running an exercise. You were criminally vandalizing his website.
 
Well, I think we've observed you long enough. Admittedly, there is the "Malcolm Kirkman" problem, but you just don't strike me as genuinely deranged.

Let's see if I'm getting the big picture: You present yourself as a moron. You exhibit no knowledge whatever about anything relating to the events of 9/11 and you profess to swallow absolutely everything the fantasy movement invents. Smart people here spend time correcting glaring errors in your posts and attempting to explain the science and engineering aspects. You are punking everyone. You are sitting there laughing at people who believe that someone as hopelessly obtuse as your persona could be real.

So far, so good. Now, you invest an enormous amount of time in this game. Surely the pleasure you received initially at pulling the wool over the eyes of these pompous skeptics must be waning. Okay, you've got a few dozen people on a blog convinced that you're a total fool. What's in it for you? Acting like a horse's ass will make people think you really are a horse's ass--well, you've established that. Enough already: What's the punchline?

Yeah. What is the endgame of what you are doing JHarrow?
 
You weren't running an exercise. You were criminally vandalizing his website.

So the warrants will be issued soon?

Sorry bucko, nothing went on Gage's website without him putting it there, or allowing it to be put there. Unless his website was hacked, you phrase about criminal vandalizing is laughable.
 
If you leave your door unlocked and get robbed, does that mistake absolve the robber of his crimes?

Are you serious?
What kind of rhetoric figure is that?

It doesn´t work at all.

He invited "experts" to sell his site with their reputation and did nothing to check their reputation. Nothing!
 
Are you serious?
What kind of rhetoric figure is that?

It doesn´t work at all.

He invited "experts" to sell his site with their reputation and did nothing to check their reputation. Nothing!

Perhaps he didn't expect some no-life trolls to criminally misrepresent themselves as engineers.
 
Perhaps he didn't expect some no-life trolls to criminally misrepresent themselves as engineers.


You use the word "criminally." As we all understand that no crime is involved, are you pretending to be stupid or is this a reflection of your actual intelligence.
 
You use the word "criminally." As we all understand that no crime is involved, are you pretending to be stupid or is this a reflection of your actual intelligence.


Are you condoning the impersonation of engineers?
 
Another interesting thing about that list is it's easy to get on but almost impossible to be removed. The "truth" movement makes no effort to remove members that no longer support the cause (even when you asked to be removed).
 
Are you condoning the impersonation of engineers?


No, I condemn the conspiracy liars who pretend in debates with rationalists to be engineers, scientists, and demolition experts.

I think you're punking us, buckaroo.
 
Last edited:
You weren't running an exercise. You were criminally vandalizing his website.

One problem with that theory, kiddo...

The folks at AE911 have been informed that several of its members are fake. One poster even told them via e-mail which name he had signed up as.

Guess what? They're still listed!

Which proves the point that debunkers set out to make when they submitted fake names in the first place: Gage and fellow morons will accept ANYONE in order to bolster their "expert" tally.

And what's even worse? People like you and einstein are dumb enough to fall for it!
 
Last edited:
Why do people keep accusing me of playing some game or being a sock?

You admitted to "playing a game"

JHarrow said:
What am I doing? If anything I am just playing you at your own game.
See?

And people have a hard time believing that you are genuinely this dumb. So, they think you're messing with them.
 
Last edited:
Perhaps he didn't expect some no-life trolls to criminally misrepresent themselves as engineers.


There's nothing criminal about misrepresenting oneself as an engineer. It's completely legal under all conceivable circumstances.

I know, because I'm a lawyer.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
Perhaps he didn't expect some no-life trolls to criminally misrepresent themselves as engineers.
Perharps.

Perharps he HAD to make sure who is supporting him. For what he wanted it was essential.
He did not care.

edit: CHF captured it much better.

btw: nice derailing.
Didn´t you want to "shred" the hardfire debate even before you watched?
All I´ve heard is some missing pictures (well, there was an eye-witness instead which isn´t too bad) and something with the water pressure.

I don´t think you have the main parts adressed yet.
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom