Actually wise guy there have been numerous reports of mysterious recordings associtated with lunar eclipses. Particularily with respect to pendulums.
Why would I care about a more recent document when the 4.2E-9 prediction compared to a 4.28E-9 actual measurement already exists.
Then give us citations rather than unsupported assertions, wise guy.
And use your theory to match the "numerous reports of mysterious recordings associtated with lunar eclipses".
We still just have your word that
one 50 year old observation exists that supports your prediction.
How many observations since then say that there was a different value of the perturbation than you predicted?
We still do not have any details on what the observation actually was.
We still do know whether the observation was repeated. A single observation is merely interesting until it is confirmed.
We still do not have enough details to see if the authors had a simple explanation for the perturbation.
Was your prediction calculated in the 1950's or 1960's (before this one and only observation). Otherwise you may want to use the term
retrodiction or postdiction.
Basically you are failing to convince anyone here that this observation even exists. Even if it exists, your failure to do the basic scientific research to look for confirmation of the observation in the last 50 years is confirmation of your low level of scientific competence.
Not that we need any given your dimensional analysis confusion
.
To which I will add a statement of yours that does not seem to have been picked upon yet:
Logical assumption. E = mc^2 as the basis for the concept of energy vs mass form and the view that space is comprised of unbound free flowing energy (energetic 3D space).
A typical crank misunderstanding of physics where they think that
energy is an actual thing or object. Energy is actually a property of a system (like entropy, charge, spin, etc.).
And yet another point: "concept of energy vs mass form" is meaningless.
E = mc^2 is the expression of
mass-energy equivalence, i.e. that energy and mass are the same thing.
