May 2007 Stundie Nominations

Barrett is a modern day Galileo because he can see through his eyes while others have blinders on. He's not afraid of a paradigm shift.

Example:

1610 Galileo says he sees moons of Jupiter, others deny it.

2005 Barrett sees the controlled demolition of Building 7, others deny it.

Sometimes I wonder how much has changed in 400 years.
Galileo | Homepage | 05.16.07 - 3:34 pm | #
Click to expand...

If I claimed to see Marilyn Monroe still alive and others deny it, does that make me like Galileo? Link
 
I'm nominating this one because it represents the "connect-the-dots" mentality so prevalent in the truther community (plus just the sheer woo of the logic). This post is in response to a rather scattered one commenting on the death of a student of Dr. Wood's last year. Enjoy.

mirandapriestly said:
Reply #13: Only problem is...
Michael Zebuhr is not listed in the Social security death index. Also he was a bioengineering student at Clemson, and Wood was Mechanical Engineering.(although "someone" put a robot.txt on the Clemson mechanical engineering archives and I can't access them (why would someone care if you looked at a college archive page? (the other departments are all there) Also, the name of Zebuhr's adviser was Lisa Benson in the bioengineering department. Every year Benson gets 4 students, that stay with her all year. I don't know when Zebuhr would have time to do Scholars for Truth. I have spent the day researching Clemson Univ, will post more later, but it is a HIGHLY militaristic school with classes like "Military Leadership" and heavy ties to the petroleum industry (The mechanical engineering building is named after Fluor, a defense contractor with a board of directors tied to the NSA/CIA, and Exxon. More details later, I'm up too late again. A lot of the graduates are in things like "Crusaders for Christ" at the same time as "urban warfare training" (and fail to see the irony, I'm sure.) Uncomfortable place for a 911 dissenter.(and unlikely place?)
Click to expand...

link to nuttery
 
No, I'm sorry, this competition is not over yet. May is proving to be a banner month.

Behold, petgoat at DU with his junkies-wired-the-towers-to-blow hypothesis:

How many people? Dr. Jones estimated that 40 men taking ten trips each could have planted the explosives.

...dead men tell no tales. Anybody who was willing to blow up the towers was willing sacrifice 5000 innocents. Do you think sacrificing 40 more junkies or child molesters would cause them to lose sleep?

I expressed some doubt that junkies would have the wherewithal to do such precise work. petgoat continues:

It ain't rocket science bolo. The junkies do the grunt work, and a supervisor checks it, and when they disappear the morning of 9/11 nobody notices.

I promise petgoat that I'm buying his drinks at the next company picnic for this magnificent piece of disinfo. petgoat continues:

As usual, you don't know what you're talking about, bolo.

Junkies can be highly competent because they have to, to survive.
They can be highly motivated too.

Forget the drooling disheveled wrecks you see on TV.

Junkies are the smartest, most charming people you'll ever meet. They have to be, to survive. NYC is full of them. Jails would be a good place to recruit them. Give them just enough stuff to tease them and they'll do anything to get the payoff at the end of the day.
Click to expand...

See, I thought it was a off-the-cuff remark. No. He's got it all worked out. He's serious. The WTC towers were wired to exploded by teams of highly motivated junkies and child molestors, who then were killed right before 9/11 so they wouldn't talk.

Now the May Stundies are over. If you think you can beat that, you need to bring it.
 
Last edited:
ihaunter said:
Barrett is a modern day Galileo because he can see through his eyes while others have blinders on. He's not afraid of a paradigm shift.
Click to expand...
If I claimed to see Marilyn Monroe still alive and others deny it, does that make me like Galileo? Link
Click to expand...

I like how he doesn't even seem to know what blinders are, implying that they completely deny vision. lol...
 
Last edited:
boloboffin said:
No, I'm sorry, this competition is not over yet. May is proving to be a banner month.

Behold, petgoat at DU with his junkies-wired-the-towers-to-blow hypothesis:



See, I thought it was a off-the-cuff remark. No. He's got it all worked out. He's serious. The WTC towers were wired to exploded by teams of highly motivated junkies and child molestors, who then were killed right before 9/11 so they wouldn't talk.

Now the May Stundies are over. If you think you can beat that, you need to bring it.
Click to expand...
Did you email Dr Jones to see if he likes the junkie idea?

I am getting better at not drinking coke and spewing it all over the screen.
 
The biggest shame is that there can be only one winner. There have been a few this month that would have dominated most other months, had they been stated earlier.
 
ihaunter said:
The biggest shame is that there can be only one winner. There have been a few this month that would have dominated most other months, had they been stated earlier.
Click to expand...


At the end of the year someone needs to make a PDF...

I propose the title:

Stundied; Quotes to Improve your Self Esteem

-Gumboot
 
I'd like to nominate Kevin Barrett, who really did his groundwork before he went to Morocco to find the alive hijacker. He is working hard to find him:

For now, here I am in the beautiful cyber-café Lima Moon, not far from the historic Portugese cisterns and the sunny, surfable beaches of lovely Al-Jadida, Morocco, sipping delicious syrupy-sweet mint tea, listening to the music of the surrounding conversations in Moroccan dialect over the rumble of traffic that drowns out the distant surf, and dreaming of interviews with elusive still-living suicide hijackers.
Click to expand...


http://www.mujca.com/waleedalshehri.htm
 
Good old Douglas Herman. The bolded part ended up in my signature because I thought it was so wonderfully ill-conceived on his part as well as ironically true.

Truthers ask the WHY and HOW, never claiming superior intelligence as proof of the validity of their claims, trying instead to understand the crucial details and anomalies of 911. Because WE ARE IGNORANT OF 911 FACTS, WE DEMAND PROOF.

Instead, Debunkers claim their superior list of scientists with advanced degrees somehow proves their THEORIES are superior.
Click to expand...

They never claim superior intelligence only asking the "why" and "how" while paying attention to details and yet are ignorant of 9/11 facts. Three lies and one hilariously ironic truth in just two sentences.

Oh and a superior list of experts with advanced degrees means nothing... interesting... only in Truther world.

Also note that earlier in the article he says:

Truthers believe, most of us anyway, that science is empirical, that is, 'relying upon or derived from observation or experiment.'
Click to expand...

Truthers believe in science being derived from observation or experiment, are admittedly ignorant of facts relating to 9/11 and yet are able to conclude it was an inside job. Wow.

http://rense.com/general76/trthers.htm
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom