That's pretty much what popehat said as well. There's nothing that can be taken from this since it's so common.
Twitter. He was absent for a while but is back.Slightly off-topic, where's the best place to keep up with popehat lately?
Slightly off-topic, where's the best place to keep up with popehat lately?
"All the President's Lawyers" podcast.
https://www.kcrw.com/news/shows/lrc-presents-all-the-presidents-lawyers
Twitter. He was absent for a while but is back.
I hope they are getting good value for their money...
From: ABC News
As Rep. Matt Gaetz faces an ongoing federal investigation into alleged sex trafficking, a new campaign finance report reveals how the Florida congressman is spending the funds that he's raised...As the investigation has ramped up, Gaetz has beefed up his legal spending, with his campaign paying $50,000 to law firms in June alone. Half of that went to the law office of New York criminal defense attorney Marc Fernich, who lists on his website "notable clients" that include...Jeffrey Epstein...El Chapo... John A. "Junior" Gotti, and "alleged propagandist in Nazi Hungary" Ferenc Koreh.
...
Gaetz has also continued to pay political operative Roger Stone amid the ongoing investigation...for "strategic campaign consulting"
I know it is a smart decision to line up competent legal representation, but getting the same lawyer who represented a pedophile and a nazi certainly puts him in, well, I would say strange company but I guess he fits right in with them.
Not sure why he's considered competent. He lost all of those cases.
I don't know about those particular cases but competent lawyers represent guilty people all the time.Not sure why he's considered competent. He lost all of those cases.
I don't know about those particular cases but competent lawyers represent guilty people all the time.
But do they generally brag about it despite not getting them off?
I have no idea about "generally". But a competent attorney can do a lot for a guilty client so they might brag about it.But do they generally brag about it despite not getting them off?
I have no idea about "generally". But a competent attorney can do a lot for a guilty client so they might brag about it.
If you or a friend of yours was guilty of a crime would you seek out an incompetent lawyer because it's cheap and competency doesn't matter for guilty clients?
Not sure why he's considered competent. He lost all of those cases.
I have no personal experience here, but I tend to doubt this is always true.If it was pretty clear that I was guilty and didn't have a way out of it then I wouldn't waste the money. I'd plea out, and pretty much any attorney can do that.
As gnome points out there are a lot of possible nuances here under "something like that".If I thought I could get off on a technicality or something like that, I'd spend the money to get an attorney I had more faith in.
I have no personal experience here, but I tend to doubt this is always true.
As gnome points out there are a lot of possible nuances here under "something like that".
Slightly off-topic, where's the best place to keep up with popehat lately?