March Stundie Nominations

dudalb said:
We need to limit the Studie Nominations that come from the Icke forums just to give other forums a chance.........
Click to expand...

Or as I suggested before, rename the award The David Icke Commemorative Stundie Award!!

Then you remove them from eligibility (but still allow their stuff to be posted for posterity's sake)
 
A positive claim is when you say there is no evidence.

SpringHallConvert said:
The claim:

This claim is a positive claim. It asserts a positive - that there was an absence of both foreknowledge and complicity on the part of the U.S. government. The evidence to support this claim is arbitrarily limited by none other than the U.S. government itself.

If you can't prove this claim, then by definition you are speculating. This makes you a "conspiracy theorist".
Click to expand...
 
Not 100% sure that it deals with a conspiracy, but I thought this:

"This board is an embarrassment to the skeptical community. If you want to see a skeptic's board where there is real intellectual activity going on, and not just infantile "mob rule" and pathetic attempts to refute anyone and everyone by parroting the two words "prove it" then go here: http://www.rationalskepticism.org"

Was pretty lulzy.

Imagine being asked to prove something!

Found over here:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?p=8153905#post8153905
 
From The Politics board @ my local Craigslist:

Random Craigslist Moonbat said:
What if the planes were shot down in midair and replaced with drones that continued to their 9/11 targets? One question that then suggests itself is what happened to the debris from the original planes. I think I have an answer: They were shot down by means of a minigun, which completely shreds its target since it is capable of firing 4,000 rounds per minute. Miniguns, essentially electrically-driven Gatling guns, were first put into service in the 1960s. A barrage from such a gun could conceivably reduce an aircraft to such small pieces that what ends up on the ground is hardly noticeable. Also, if the planes were shot down from a fairly high altitude, which is likely, the debris would have spread over a very large area, making detection doubly difficult. If the engagements took place over sparsely populated territory, there wouldn't have been any noise witnesses when the guns were fired. The guns could have been fired from the drones or from additional planes utilized by the perpetrators. The drones presumably were specially hardened so that they could penetrate the target buildings where ordinary craft would have crumpled on impact.

I'm not saying this is what happened, just that the story holds together.
Click to expand...

So much delicious stupid in that post. :)

The regulars at CL tend to flag any 9/11 posts (truther and debunker) off the board within minutes, so the link may already be dead:

http://sfbay.craigslist.org/eby/pol/2929852140.html

(At least it'll be recorded here permanently.)
 
Last edited:
That's too sweet AJM.

If I'd been paying attention to the url, I could have guessed the writer is in Berzerkley. :)

I'm from San Mateo.
 
Jim_MDP said:
That's too sweet AJM.

If I'd been paying attention to the url, I could have guessed the writer is in Berzerkley. :)

I'm from San Mateo.
Click to expand...

Yeah, he's a reg on that board. He only dabbles in the 9/11 stuff but the other stuff he posts about is equally daft. You should have a read there when you need a good laugh.
 
SpringHallConvert said:
False. A preemptive strike would have made the United States the aggressor since Japan sending a fleet toward Pearl Harbor could not, in and of itself, be considered an act of war.

You're just spouting nonsense.
Click to expand...
Because apparently any kind of defensive measure is an act of aggression.

TacticalUSArmyFacepalm.png
 
From the comments on a news website from South Carolina. The story is about a large sturgeon that washed up on the beach and some mistook for a sea monster. One commentator has is own take on history.

well there is 2 types of SCIENTIST, Evolutionist & Creationist...& according to the creation scientist, most dinosuars was washed away during flood of noah,(land dinos) & the flying dinosuars was killed off during the viking era & dark ages. the archeology evidence proves that vikings killed dragons & placed their heads on the end of the ship for show! (snip)...evolution is a load of lies, nothing scientific about evolution. the fossil record is based off assumptions & ideas.
Click to expand...

Assumptions, ideas, and.... Fossils! Having Viking ancestry I wish this were true.

The man goes on from there but that was my favorite part.

viking dragon hunters
 
Last edited:
When trying to explain Richard Gage's speaking tour of Canada, SpringHallConvert had this to say...

"You profess to love freedom, but that's not possible, because if you really did, you'd support the freedom of people to be ignorant, to hold ignorant ideas, and to shout their ignorance from the rooftops. Freedom doesn't mean that only you get to have it. It means everybody has it."
Click to expand...

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8142279&postcount=27

This should not only receive a Stundie but should get a Best Truther Foot-In-Mouth Yet!!
 
Biscuit said:
viking dragon hunters
Click to expand...


"R we really that dumb to believe that this SEA CREATURE is a spurgeon? lol EVOlUTION THEORIST always label a SEA CREATURE or MONSTER as a fish or something...smh bcuz they know if they admit that sea creatures exist it would TOTALLY DESTROY THE (FALSE) EVOLUTION THEORY (big bang) The bible makes it clear that Dinosaurs & sea creatures existed w/ humans. JOB chapter 40 & 41."

Yeah, it's a *SEA CREATURE*, not a spurgeon! Stoopid scientists with their santan inspired 'facts'....
 
BaaBaa said:
"R we really that dumb to believe that this SEA CREATURE is a spurgeon? lol EVOlUTION THEORIST always label a SEA CREATURE or MONSTER as a fish or something...smh bcuz they know if they admit that sea creatures exist it would TOTALLY DESTROY THE (FALSE) EVOLUTION THEORY (big bang) The bible makes it clear that Dinosaurs & sea creatures existed w/ humans. JOB chapter 40 & 41."

Yeah, it's a *SEA CREATURE*, not a spurgeon! Stoopid scientists with their santan inspired 'facts'....
Click to expand...

Those damn scientists specifically labeling some sea creatures as fish! Just call everything in the sea a sea creature and everything on land a land creature! why be more specific than that?
 
BaaBaa said:
"R we really that dumb to believe that this SEA CREATURE is a spurgeon? lol EVOlUTION THEORIST always label a SEA CREATURE or MONSTER as a fish or something...smh bcuz they know if they admit that sea creatures exist it would TOTALLY DESTROY THE (FALSE) EVOLUTION THEORY (big bang) The bible makes it clear that Dinosaurs & sea creatures existed w/ humans. JOB chapter 40 & 41.

Yeah, it's a *SEA CREATURE*, not a spurgeon! Stoopid scientists with their santan inspired 'facts'....
Click to expand...
"Spurgeon?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom