March Stundie Nominations

[fromdownunder]

Travis is going to have his work cut out this month limiting the nomiations to 20 finalists.

Norm

 

[000063]

Do not mock Nanothermite.

"Do not taunt the happy fun nanothermite."

 

[NoahFence]

Someone had to...

...and that would be an advantage or a disadvantage in a covert demolition?

Shhh.....


BOOM!

 

[Travis]

Travis is going to have his work cut out this month limiting the nomiations to 20 finalists.

Norm

Yep. Though it is hard every month some months are worse than others.

"Do not taunt the happy fun nanothermite."

Someone is up on their SNL.

 

[Complexity]

Is it me, or has anyone else noticed the curious slow down in Anders Lindman's usual disturbingly constant posting since SpringHallConvert began his posting spree? Do you think Anders is feeling neglected, crowded out? Poor Anders...

Have you ever seen them in the same room at the same time?

 

[Complexity]

The conspiracy at play in the above is one of moderators tricking Furcifer into posting actionable posts. Very sinister.

I didn't know he needed assistance doing that...

 

[jaydeehess]

I stumbled upon the greatest blog on Tumblr. This might not be as funny to me later in the day but I don't care:

....................
Oh god, one more:

Quote:
#15) What do you make of the First Amendment?

I think it depends on how you interpret it. I believe liberals take it far too literally.

He believes its the Liberals who take constitutional phrasing too literally?
Yeah, the conservatives are the ones known for playing so loosey goosey with the Constitution.

Wonder how he feels about "........the right of the people to keep and bear arms....."

 

[BravesFan]

 

[Kid Eager]

[qimg]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSdKE25U85li2q1_qCMwo4fx4dH48tlJ1ZmGJS1LaMPrUnRjOIcKFQKjagd[/qimg]

For a second, I thought that was a poster for The Right To Arm Bears...

 

[fourtoe]

He believes its the Liberals who take constitutional phrasing too literally?
Yeah, the conservatives are the ones known for playing so loosey goosey with the Constitution.

Wonder how he feels about "........the right of the people to keep and bear arms....."

Every time someone talks about how he says horrible things he counters by saying, "I guess you guys don't like free speech!"
My favorite tumblr blog.

[qimg]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSdKE25U85li2q1_qCMwo4fx4dH48tlJ1ZmGJS1LaMPrUnRjOIcKFQKjagd[/qimg]

Adorbz.

I'm not submitting this as a Stundie, I just think it is funny:

#2) Are you racist?

No! I am not a socialist - I don’t put people into races and can’t be racist.

 

[BaaBaa]

Have you ever seen them in the same room at the same time?

Not since I put them both on ignore...

 

[TJM]

<snip>Some people mock Richard Gage's 'box demonstration', taking its simplistic illustration far too literally.

Gage's main concerns about the cardboard model's authenticity, were the WTC1 building volumes, above and below impact.

His cardboard models displayed with sufficient accuracy, those building volumes.<snip>

Hmm...

I guess the building volume part is implied.

 

[BravesFan]

Oh, Oh...OHHHHH MYYYY GODD!!!! That's the worst example of comparitive physics I have ever seen!!!! Somewhere Dr Julius Sumner-Miller is spinning in his grave!!!


How can AN AVERAGE HUMAN THINK THAT'S A GOOD EXAMPLE?


I need a drink.

 

[Robrob]

From a no-planer 9/11 Facebook debate:

But, even if the plane managed to even get far enough in, it would still be confronted by that massive concrete and steel I-beam support structure. If any part of that plane hit that center core, it would have immediately come to a complete stop with a large portion of the plane sticking outside the tower, since there was not enough space (from outer edge to inner core) to contain the full length of the plane.

 

[tsig]

From a no-planer 9/11 Facebook debate:

Cartoon physics.

 

[Mudcat]

Cartoon physics.

No. If it were the towers would have come to an immediate collapse.

 

[Mudcat]

Well SHC is a special kind of special, alright.

So, judging from the responses provided here, the answer to the original question is a resounding "yes". Osama bin Laden can safely and justifiably be referred to as a "caveman mastermind" in discussions with government truthers who believe he was the center of the government-approved conspiracy theory they subscribe to.

Any last objections?

See, isn't just precious? Running his victory lap... On the first lap... Going the wrong way... After a false start...

 

[triforcharity]

Well SHC is a special kind of special, alright.




See, isn't just precious? Running his victory lap... On the first lap... Going the wrong way... After a false start...

On the wrong track, the wrong day, with nobody else there.

Cheers!

 

[Kid Eager]

I'm wondering if SHC is JudeBrando's sleeper comedic alter-ego....

 

[Sword_Of_Truth]

Christopher7 doesn't like the tone of our discussion of Dick Gages upcoming appearance in Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada.

You don't respect the 1st amendment.

You have a right to your opinion and Mr. Gage has an equal right to his. You both have an equal right to express your opinions anytime anywhere. Any call to prevent free speech is an attack on the first amendment.