March Stundie Nominations

In a discussion about whether "might" means the same as "might not."

It's not semantics, it's how the English language is structured.

The conspiracy at play in the above is one of moderators tricking Furcifer into posting actionable posts. Very sinister.
 
Originally Posted by SpringHallConvert
You see, the government did do it. The corrupt members of our government are the government. If they weren't the government then they wouldn't have had the power to carry out the 9/11 attacks, as the government members who aren't corrupt would have been able to stop them. But they couldn't.

Our shadow government is the real government.

How did I miss that one?
 
I don't need to prove that the evidence is crap, because it's your evidence. The burden of proof is on you to prove that the evidence isn't crap.

You guys have failed miserably in this task.


another beauty by our new buddy SHC! Verifying that he is indeed attempting to have us prove a negative!
 
Not a Stundie, but I couldn't think of where else to post this. Looks like Rerevisionist and crew have folded their tents and slipped away - Nukelies.com is no more.

And spring is in the air: life is good.
 
THESE are but a small collection of some of the idiotic output of "amandareckonwith" over at the DI fruitcake shop.

Mandy's been running a Judy Wood spamathon over there for quite a while. I'm not sure if any are really that Stundie-worthy but I thought I'd quote a few just for the lulzzzzzzz.

BTW I have a sneaking suspicion Mandy is a sock of very familiar Judy Wood obsessive who doesn't post much here anymore. Any bets on who it might be?


Post #1120
labouysse said:
What is her evidence?

All we ever get from Amanda is "buy her book" spam.

Seriously - what is her evidence?

Post #1123
amandareckonwith said:
It is not spam to inform people that they must read her book and discover the evidence on their own and not rely on the uninformed "opinions" or 'beliefs" of other people because this IS the the subject. However, your remark and accusation of spam is OFF TOPIC AND DISRUPTIVE TO PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATION. Read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? and empower yourself with the evidence. Once again I say, "It wasn't poor construction, jet fuel, demolition charges of any type, missiles or planes, mini-nukes, or super-duper-micro-mini-nano-thermite that turned two quarter mile high buildings with a combined weight of over a million tons into microscopic dust particles in mid-air taking less than 10 seconds each. There were over 100 floors in each tower. Try clapping your hands 100 times in 10 seconds.





Post #1126
indolering said:
May I ask where you're from? If that's you in your avatar my guess would be India.

Post #1127
amandareckonwith said:
I am not from India. I am from the Pisces-Cetus Supercluster Complex.





Post #1129
montmorency said:
I must admit I haven't read the book yet, but I found her very credible in that interview with Theo Chalmers which is linked from her site.

Unfortunately, some of the other videos she has linked there don't seem to quite support her case. e.g. she talked at various points about there being no evidence for residual great heat long after the incident (and no evidence for molten metal), but there is video there showing fires flaring up when wreckage is disturbed by clearup workers, and a caption saying that the last fire went out (or was put out) some time in December.

Post #1130
amandareckonwith said:
If you pick up a Firefly does it burn your fingers?





Post #1138
amandareckonwith said:
Wood's 800-pages of findings beg to be read. And bring on the skeptics.

"Just look at my book. There is no denying the evidence of directed, free-energy technology. This technology is not a secret anymore. Think of what knowing this will change."

So far no one has disputed any of the evidence presented in her book.

:=]

Compus
 
THESE are but a small collection of some of the idiotic output of "amandareckonwith" over at the DI fruitcake shop.

As a veteran of several jammy threads, gotta say I don't believe that's him - the lack of blurry youtube screen grabs and the unique formatting which usually includes oversize colored fonts isn't present, and the suspect posts don't even come close to the usual 1000+ word walls of text jammy would put up.

But on the bright side, those post look like they're from none other than Dr. Wood herself, which if true, is pure stundie gold.

Nice find. :)
 
Chemtrails kill chickens!

"In this country government kills its own people. Our politician are completly corrupted and doesn't have any right to represent people, they lye to us every day. Our elections is joke and complete falcification. Our prime minister is a criminal who is involved in henocide of its own people. Our royal family is involved in hidden conspiracy of dumping deadly and toxic chemicals from the aircraft to UK population. Our bankers and business elite is financing this henocide operation."

http://forum.davidicke.com/showthread.php?t=12128&page=161
 
Hasn't that last one popped up before? Or is just hauntingly familiar?
 

Back
Top Bottom